• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Equal Length headers

  • Thread starter Thread starter Matts89LX5.0
  • Start date Start date Mar 18, 2004
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
M

Matts89LX5.0

Founding Member
Nov 1, 2002
1,314
0
36
Long Island, NY
Mar 18, 2004
#1
  • Mar 18, 2004
  • #1
i heard that equal length headers aren't as efficient as unequal length shorties on a stock motor...is this true? thanks in advance.

Matt
 

colemanitis

Member
Apr 1, 2003
145
0
16
Panama City, FL
Mar 18, 2004
#2
  • Mar 18, 2004
  • #2
I'm tagging along. I'm buying headers today and am trying to decide which ones to order.
 

SorsCode

20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 10, 2003
1,020
428
113
St. Louis, MO
Mar 18, 2004
#3
  • Mar 18, 2004
  • #3
Equal Length headers will give you more power of unequal but the gain probly isn't work it.... 5.0 Mag just did a test on different styles like unequal,equal,long tubes, and the Equal Length headers did the best..

But of course the Hooker Super Comps Shorties blew them all out of the water
 

Michael Yount

Mustang Master
Apr 10, 2002
9,039
6
79
Charlotte, NC
Mar 18, 2004
#4
  • Mar 18, 2004
  • #4
Actually, you have to look closely at the data on the test in the current issue of MM&FF. They tested equal and unequal shorties, and 1 5/8 and 1 3/4 long tubes all by the same maker. For peak power, there was very little difference between any of them - I think a 4HP spread - and the shorties actually made one or 2 more HP than the long tubes did. However, look down the charts at 3000 rpm where they started recording data. The long tubes made 20+HP and almost 40 LB-FT!!!! more than the shorties - a HUGE difference. I suspect that difference may be even greater below 3000 rpm, but they didn't show the data. The amazing thing is, the article didn't even highlight those differences. According to their tests, there wouldn't be a whole lot of difference between long tubes and shorties on an engine like theirs with the rest of their exhaust system configuration AT PEAK. But for street driven cars that spend the vast majority of their time below 3 grand there is a huge difference. If you don't mind the inconvenience of the install and the greater cost (especially ceramic coated) the long tubes are the way to go.
 

mustangdaren

Founding Member
Apr 21, 2002
605
0
0
Hildebran, North Carolina
Mar 18, 2004
#5
  • Mar 18, 2004
  • #5
I bought a set of equal lenth MAC shortys a while back and they rubbed the strut tower on the passenger side. I had new convertible (stiffer) motor mounts so I know the motor was not sagging. I ended up putting my regular MAC shortys back on and will eventually go with BBK longtubes.
 

Michael Yount

Mustang Master
Apr 10, 2002
9,039
6
79
Charlotte, NC
Mar 18, 2004
#6
  • Mar 18, 2004
  • #6
While your motor mounts may not have been sagging, I believe the convertible mounts cause the engine to sit lower than it normally would. People use them intentionally for this effect when they're trying to get more hood clearance for superchargers, spacers, etc.
 

colemanitis

Member
Apr 1, 2003
145
0
16
Panama City, FL
Mar 18, 2004
#7
  • Mar 18, 2004
  • #7
Seems the small HP gain of Equal headers isn't worth all the inconveniences that it brings. Therefore, I'm choosing BBK Unequals. Infact, I just placed my order!
 

IMissMy93Fox

New Member
Mar 9, 2004
143
0
0
Mar 18, 2004
#8
  • Mar 18, 2004
  • #8
I think I might try longtubes when i do it... seems like a PITA but for 40 ft/lbs its probably worth it.
 

mustangdaren

Founding Member
Apr 21, 2002
605
0
0
Hildebran, North Carolina
Mar 18, 2004
#9
  • Mar 18, 2004
  • #9
I wish it did set lower. My vortech discharge tube rubs the side of my hood even with a 4inch cowl hood. The cartech intake sets pretty high and I have a 1inch spacer under it so it will clear my fuel pressure regulator. I guess this intake was designed expecting the person to have aftermarket fuel rails with the regulator mounted elsewhere.
 

HarleyFordFan

New Member
Jan 4, 2004
239
0
0
Mar 18, 2004
#10
  • Mar 18, 2004
  • #10
hmmm. i have a set of mac equal lengths ready to go on the car.. how difficult is the install on them? i never put a set in before.
 
S

stang2004

Founding Member
Sep 23, 2001
177
0
0
Northern Jersey
Mar 18, 2004
#11
  • Mar 18, 2004
  • #11
i have a set of BBK chrome Equal Length... i dont really have anything else to judge them off, but i like them =)
 

mustangdaren

Founding Member
Apr 21, 2002
605
0
0
Hildebran, North Carolina
Mar 18, 2004
#12
  • Mar 18, 2004
  • #12
The MAC eguals I had were a pain to get the bolts in. Of coarse MAC is famous for having poor alignment no mater which ones you get but the tubes on the equal length headers give you less clearance which makes it a little tougher to get the bolts in.
 

fordman54935

Member
Jan 10, 2003
301
0
16
Wisconsin
Mar 18, 2004
#13
  • Mar 18, 2004
  • #13
MAC equal length headers are a PITA to install, but having someone there to help you will make a world of difference. The problem is in the design of the headers, in which they have 4 separate mounting flanges (one for each tube). The best way to do it is to get the bolts started on the most rearward tube first, then get the other ones started, saving the #1 or #5 (depending on which side your working on) for last, because the tubes are long and straight, they are the most flexible. Having someone there to push or pull on the tube while you start the bolts will make it much easier. Worked for me! I do have a thing for the way an equal length header looks, I think they just look plain cool. MUSTANGDAREN isn't kidding when he says his passenger side header rubbed on the strut tower, it is a tight fit. Mine doesn't rub though. Also, keep an eye on your smog pump hoses also because they will get pretty toasty down there if they are too close to the headers. Hope this helps!
 
M

Matts89LX5.0

Founding Member
Nov 1, 2002
1,314
0
36
Long Island, NY
Mar 18, 2004
#14
  • Mar 18, 2004
  • #14
actually i was asking because i have a set of mac equal length headers. I wanted to know if it is worth putting them in eventually or just getting unequals until i buy some BBK Long tubes headers. btw the mac equal lengths only costed me $20
 

Js90Lx

Founding Member
Jul 25, 2000
1,124
0
0
Athens, GA
Mar 18, 2004
#15
  • Mar 18, 2004
  • #15
The bassani equal length shorties I currently have were pretty easy to install. I did have to loosen the mounts and raise the motor a little but its not hard. I also can work around them freely.
 
S

Sicarius428

Active Member
Jan 6, 2004
2,085
5
49
Mar 18, 2004
#16
  • Mar 18, 2004
  • #16
Headers are pretty easy to put on. If you get equal lenghs you may have to unbolt the engine mount and lift it up a tad. No biggie.
Kevin
 

93 teal terror

Founding Member
Jul 13, 2001
971
62
69
Durham N.C.
Mar 18, 2004
#17
  • Mar 18, 2004
  • #17
Unbolt the Passenger side valve cover and slide it back a little. This will give you some much needed extran clearance. I found this helps a lot after taking them on/off many times
 
H

Highbredcloud

Active Member
Mar 4, 2003
1,075
1
36
Palos Hills, IL
Mar 18, 2004
#18
  • Mar 18, 2004
  • #18
Michael Yount said:
While your motor mounts may not have been sagging, I believe the convertible mounts cause the engine to sit lower than it normally would. People use them intentionally for this effect when they're trying to get more hood clearance for superchargers, spacers, etc.
Click to expand...

Micheal...I heard this before but I wasn't sure if this was true...so a convertible motor actually sits lower than a regular motor? If so its a good thing I went with shortie equal length as oppose to the LT's or else I would possible have clearance problems with the LT's on a convertible motor...
 

Michael Yount

Mustang Master
Apr 10, 2002
9,039
6
79
Charlotte, NC
Mar 18, 2004
#19
  • Mar 18, 2004
  • #19
Hello highbredcloud - it's only what I've read in a number of posts from others. It typically comes in the context of, say, trying to fit a 351 in under minimum or no hood alterations - and they'll say use the aftermarket cross member, the convertible mounts, and no manifold spacers. If I were you I'd start a separate thread - and ask the question of the group tonight - "Do convertible mounts lower the engine? If so, how much?" I'll learn/confirm something too. Cause if they do, when time comes to swap mine out, I need to stay away from them. I can't afford to go any lower without oil pan interference with the cross member.
 
T

Timmey9

Member
Jun 9, 2003
112
0
17
Mar 18, 2004
#20
  • Mar 18, 2004
  • #20
Michael Yount said:
Actually, you have to look closely at the data on the test in the current issue of MM&FF. They tested equal and unequal shorties, and 1 5/8 and 1 3/4 long tubes all by the same maker. For peak power, there was very little difference between any of them - I think a 4HP spread - and the shorties actually made one or 2 more HP than the long tubes did. However, look down the charts at 3000 rpm where they started recording data. The long tubes made 20+HP and almost 40 LB-FT!!!! more than the shorties - a HUGE difference. I suspect that difference may be even greater below 3000 rpm, but they didn't show the data. The amazing thing is, the article didn't even highlight those differences. According to their tests, there wouldn't be a whole lot of difference between long tubes and shorties on an engine like theirs with the rest of their exhaust system configuration AT PEAK. But for street driven cars that spend the vast majority of their time below 3 grand there is a huge difference. If you don't mind the inconvenience of the install and the greater cost (especially ceramic coated) the long tubes are the way to go.
Click to expand...



I saw that too. That makes me want to go out and buy some LT's now. Are there any that will fit the GT-40p's i am putting on? I am going to be so broke by the end of the summer.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

C
Need MIL Eliminators?
  • crazyone64
  • May 18, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
69
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech May 21, 2026
GOvert
G
M
Engine Unexplainable Exhaust Pop and Gurgle
  • Mrnissen122
  • Feb 14, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
12
Views
457
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 18, 2026
Noobz347
T
408w pushrods
  • Towegage
  • Sep 19, 2025
  • Fox Engine Swaparoo
Replies
5
Views
244
Fox Engine Swaparoo Sep 19, 2025
Noobz347
M
Gt40p headers
  • Mike3
  • Oct 14, 2025
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
13
Views
643
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Nov 1, 2025
Blackhawkxx
Gt40 e303 combo questions
  • 99mustanggt2018
  • Mar 30, 2025
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
2
Views
403
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Mar 30, 2025
KRUISR
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?