• Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech

Exhaust: Need help understanding how something works/functions

  • Thread starter Thread starter fox1x
  • Start date Start date Feb 9, 2007
F

fox1x

New Member
Oct 3, 2005
157
0
0
Northwest Ohio
Feb 9, 2007
#1
  • Feb 9, 2007
  • #1
I've heard that the '05+ exhaust systems are a big improvement over the previous years. (Sound better, flow better, etc.) I've been looking at exhaust and realize that there are "axle-back systems", and there are "cat-back systems."

Now, I do understand what the difference between these two products are, what I don't understand is what's the added benefit of the cat-back system over the axle-back on our cars? It seems logical to me that the difference is in the muffler anyway, so what advantage is there to buying the extra pipe that runs to the cats? (I also realize [think I do anyways] the difference in x-pipes and h-pipes, I just want to focus on the acutual systems)

For instance here is an axle-back: http://www.partshopper.com/shop/MAC-SS-Mustang-Axleback-Exhaust-2005-2006-2007-GT-m120.html

And here is the cat-back: http://www.partshopper.com/shop/Magnaflow-Mustang-Exhaust-System-2005-2006-2007-GT-m28.html

I know they are different brands, but I was just using these as examples to help illustrate my point. The only benefit I see that the cat-back system has is that it's manderal bent. I haven't looked under my car, so I'm not so sure that the stock system isn't manderal bent. Can anyone help me understand why I should buy one over the other? And, if one is better, is the added cost difference make the purchase worth it? Thanks.
 

bigcat

start with the upper hole, and if more traction is
May 1, 2005
3,015
1
79
7200 feet
Feb 9, 2007
#2
  • Feb 9, 2007
  • #2
the stock exhaust is mandrel bent, but it does have a slightly flat spot above the rear axle. most people agree that it is not worth the extra money for a complete catback system. there are some that claim the catback is better, but no dynosheets are coming to mind where they proved it. the stock exhaust flows pretty well as it is, so there are not huge gains to be had when replacing the pipes or mufflers. another point that has been brought up about the catback is that some of them eliminate a few bends in the pipe, allowing easier flow.

IMO, stick with axleback.
 
F

fox1x

New Member
Oct 3, 2005
157
0
0
Northwest Ohio
Feb 9, 2007
#3
  • Feb 9, 2007
  • #3
Ahh thank you bigcat.

This is what I had been wondering. I really didn't expect "big" gains, I was mostly geting the exhaust for the enhanced aggressive sound!

I figured that there could not be gain from the complete system, but, I've been wrong many a times before.
 

GOLDENPONY

Founding Member
Jan 23, 2002
1,503
0
36
LOVELAND, OHIO
Feb 9, 2007
#4
  • Feb 9, 2007
  • #4
bigcat said:
the stock exhaust is mandrel bent, but it does have a slightly flat spot above the rear axle. most people agree that it is not worth the extra money for a complete catback system. there are some that claim the catback is better, but no dynosheets are coming to mind where they proved it. the stock exhaust flows pretty well as it is, so there are not huge gains to be had when replacing the pipes or mufflers. another point that has been brought up about the catback is that some of them eliminate a few bends in the pipe, allowing easier flow.

IMO, stick with axleback.
Click to expand...

+1
 

bigcat

start with the upper hole, and if more traction is
May 1, 2005
3,015
1
79
7200 feet
Feb 9, 2007
#5
  • Feb 9, 2007
  • #5
here is a pic of the said flat spot.

 

Attachments

  • 000_0133.webp
    24.5 KB · Views: 184
F

fox1x

New Member
Oct 3, 2005
157
0
0
Northwest Ohio
Feb 9, 2007
#6
  • Feb 9, 2007
  • #6
Yeah, unless something amazing comes along, you've convinced me. Now I will continue to listen to endless audio clips about which sound I like.. and try and figure which one to get....
 

kooldawg6

mine works really well and can take a fair amount
Aug 31, 2006
1,679
2
38
Central VA
Feb 10, 2007
#7
  • Feb 10, 2007
  • #7
I have looked at my factory exhaust twice now when it's been up on a lift. It is by far a HUGE improvement over any of the other body style's systems! Bigger pipe from front to rear and is now all mandrel bent as BigCat stated. Biggest gain in power over stock on these S197s systems is by changing the headers.

BigCat, would you say to get good equal lengths to match the Pypes O/R H or get all new and go long tubes????
 
T

thump_rrr

New Member
Nov 25, 2004
220
0
0
Montreal, Canada
Feb 10, 2007
#8
  • Feb 10, 2007
  • #8
kooldawg6 said:
I have looked at my factory exhaust twice now when it's been up on a lift. It is by far a HUGE improvement over any of the other body style's systems! Bigger pipe from front to rear and is now all mandrel bent as BigCat stated. Biggest gain in power over stock on these S197s systems is by changing the headers.

BigCat, would you say to get good equal lengths to match the Pypes O/R H or get all new and go long tubes????
Click to expand...
Tests have shown no gains of over 5-6 hp on shorties. Longtubes with cats give gains in the range of 20-25 rwhp with a retune. I gained 16/100ths in the 1/4 mile without a retune on JBA Longtubes with cats.
 

kooldawg6

mine works really well and can take a fair amount
Aug 31, 2006
1,679
2
38
Central VA
Feb 10, 2007
#9
  • Feb 10, 2007
  • #9
Which ones are you talking about? True shorties or the equal length shorties? I was wondering about the equal length ones.
 
T

thump_rrr

New Member
Nov 25, 2004
220
0
0
Montreal, Canada
Feb 10, 2007
#10
  • Feb 10, 2007
  • #10
The MM&FF test found the best ones to be the JBA's which are not equal length to my knowledge.
 

bigcat

start with the upper hole, and if more traction is
May 1, 2005
3,015
1
79
7200 feet
Feb 10, 2007
#11
  • Feb 10, 2007
  • #11
kooldawg6 said:
BigCat, would you say to get good equal lengths to match the Pypes O/R H or get all new and go long tubes????
Click to expand...

FWIW, i personally will go long tubes before i ever get a shorty style header.
 

kooldawg6

mine works really well and can take a fair amount
Aug 31, 2006
1,679
2
38
Central VA
Feb 10, 2007
#12
  • Feb 10, 2007
  • #12
Thanks bigcat & thump_rrr! I will probably be upgrading those next year.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

L
Is catback worth it over axle backs?
  • Lorencarson
  • May 15, 2025
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
667
2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk- May 15, 2025
89ripper
1999 Mustang GT - No Start- Need help understanding the fuel pump circuit and how it works
  • 99gtGuy
  • Nov 4, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
504
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Nov 7, 2025
04newedge-
0
G
Quiet my 2015 GT on the cheap
  • gsrblack
  • Feb 12, 2025
  • 2015 - 2023 (S550) Mustang -General/Talk
Replies
6
Views
754
2015 - 2023 (S550) Mustang -General/Talk Apr 16, 2025
gkomo
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
45
Views
2K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 4, 2026
nickyb
M
Progress Thread mkk50's Progress Thread
  • mkk50
  • Aug 4, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
19
Views
695
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 22, 2025
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?