• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Exhaust pipe diameter

  • Thread starter Thread starter 5.0_GT_kid
  • Start date Start date Apr 18, 2004

5.0_GT_kid

20+ Year Stangneter
Apr 18, 2004
1,155
1
39
Largo, Florida
Apr 18, 2004
#1
  • Apr 18, 2004
  • #1
I'm wondering about what size pipes I should go with when I buy my GT. I know I'm going to run LT headers and an H-pipe with a Magnaflow catback.

I know most people with Mustangs use 2.5 inch tubing. Cool, but how much will that handle in terms of quarter mile and HP numbers? Should I start out with 3 inch tubing?

Also I was on the Magnaflow site and found their catback exhaust system, but it is only listed as 2.5 diameter. Do they have a 3inch system that just isn't listed?
 

Badlilstang

Founding Member
Feb 21, 2001
1,606
0
37
Spring , Texas
Apr 18, 2004
#2
  • Apr 18, 2004
  • #2
Give us your engine specs and we can tell you wich exhuast to run... if you have a 331 or larger motor id go with the 3" exhuast or if you have a high rpm 306 you may want to go with 3". Im running 2.5" on my 331 and making 373 rwhp. I had the exhaust befor I went with this motor.. id go 3" for my setup if I had to do it over but it worked great with my mid 12 sec 302 I was running.
 
3

331 cobra

New Member
Oct 14, 2003
398
0
0
Silicon Valley CA
Apr 18, 2004
#3
  • Apr 18, 2004
  • #3
2.5 will be plenty for up to about 400hp. Beyond that 3" might be a little bit better but 2.5 would still work fine.

You need to think about what you want to do with your car, and what is realistic.

When I was 17, I wanted superchargers and n2o, but I never had the money for that stuff. Figure out what you want, and what you can get in a realistic time frame. Don't forget about school, it will take a lot of your time.

Now that you have a realistic idea of what you can get for your car, figure out what will give you the most bang for the buck. A mustang with a 3" exhaust and a billet distributor is going to be just as fast as stock. You could get an offroad h-pipe and underdrive pulleys for about the same price, but you will have added power.

Look at the standard bolt on's and try to reproduce a combination that is making good power.
 

5.0_GT_kid

20+ Year Stangneter
Apr 18, 2004
1,155
1
39
Largo, Florida
Apr 18, 2004
#4
  • Apr 18, 2004
  • #4
Well I'm going to be picking up a 1994 or 1995 GT within the next couple weeks as I've narrowed my search down. I want to do a 347 stroker from D.S.S (just the kit) and top it off with a Edelbrock performer RPM II or Victor intake and AFR heads. I'll stay naturally aspirated by the way.

Of course it'll take time for me to get the money together for the engine combo, I'm just curious how much the 2.5 inch system will take.
 

Badlilstang

Founding Member
Feb 21, 2001
1,606
0
37
Spring , Texas
Apr 18, 2004
#5
  • Apr 18, 2004
  • #5
5.0_GT_kid said:
Well I'm going to be picking up a 1994 or 1995 GT within the next couple weeks as I've narrowed my search down. I want to do a 347 stroker from D.S.S (just the kit) and top it off with a Edelbrock performer RPM II or Victor intake and AFR heads. I'll stay naturally aspirated by the way.

Of course it'll take time for me to get the money together for the engine combo, I'm just curious how much the 2.5 inch system will take.
Click to expand...


3" exhaust would compliment that well.
 

5.0_GT_kid

20+ Year Stangneter
Apr 18, 2004
1,155
1
39
Largo, Florida
Apr 18, 2004
#6
  • Apr 18, 2004
  • #6
Sounds good. Badlilstang I see you run a 331, would you suggest the RPM II or the Victor intake (EFI versions) on a 347? I know mac makes a 3 inch prochamber but does magnaflow make a 3 inch catback for our cars?
 
8

85GTlover

New Member
Mar 20, 2004
704
0
0
Apr 18, 2004
#7
  • Apr 18, 2004
  • #7
I have heard of guys losing alot of gas mileage and little performance gain. But like others said it would depend on your motor. The sizes are likely common for a reason.
 

Badlilstang

Founding Member
Feb 21, 2001
1,606
0
37
Spring , Texas
Apr 18, 2004
#8
  • Apr 18, 2004
  • #8
5.0_GT_kid said:
Sounds good. Badlilstang I see you run a 331, would you suggest the RPM II or the Victor intake (EFI versions) on a 347? I know mac makes a 3 inch prochamber but does magnaflow make a 3 inch catback for our cars?
Click to expand...


Id go with the RPM II between those two. The victor would be good if you were gonna spin the motor high or use forced induction. Not sure on the magnaflow exhuast for 3" I never looked. I know mac has a 3" catback for our cars.
 

viperos

New Member
May 19, 2003
2,943
0
0
Bellevue, WA (yes, the land where every 16 year o
Apr 18, 2004
#9
  • Apr 18, 2004
  • #9
well, 2.5" works really well to about 275RWHP... then you want to be running 2.75" tubing... until about 350RWHP, then 3" tubing... if you start w/ something that high, your stang will be worse than a stock 80s neon!
 

95/5.0stang

New Member
Apr 16, 2004
77
0
0
Apr 18, 2004
#10
  • Apr 18, 2004
  • #10
I just got my full exhaust done and its all 2.5 and runs awesome
i can tell a difference between stock
 

Rootus

Officially Addicted
Feb 8, 2003
6,659
1
0
Portland, Oregon
Apr 18, 2004
#11
  • Apr 18, 2004
  • #11
It's worth mentioning that there are people [in this forum] running stock 2.25" cat-backs with 300 rwhp setups. By the time the exhaust gets past the H-pipe, it is much cooler than when it leaves the engine, and it has condensed considerably. If you want bigger tubes, spend the money where it matters to have bigger tubes, which is close to the engine. The cat-back is just for noise.

Dave
 

viperos

New Member
May 19, 2003
2,943
0
0
Bellevue, WA (yes, the land where every 16 year o
Apr 18, 2004
#12
  • Apr 18, 2004
  • #12
BUT NOISE MATTERS TO US!!!

-seriously though, I put 2.5" O/R H on, and just ran it like that, dude, I wish I could run it that way 24/7/365.249 (yes, I'm a nerd )
 

Rootus

Officially Addicted
Feb 8, 2003
6,659
1
0
Portland, Oregon
Apr 19, 2004
#13
  • Apr 19, 2004
  • #13
viperos said:
BUT NOISE MATTERS TO US!!!
Click to expand...
I know . I didn't say don't do a cat-back, just don't waste time with 3" pipes.

Dave
 

5.0_GT_kid

20+ Year Stangneter
Apr 18, 2004
1,155
1
39
Largo, Florida
Apr 19, 2004
#14
  • Apr 19, 2004
  • #14
Thanks for the replies guys, I really appreciate the info. Would you recommend the Magnaflow catback?
 

viperos

New Member
May 19, 2003
2,943
0
0
Bellevue, WA (yes, the land where every 16 year o
Apr 22, 2004
#15
  • Apr 22, 2004
  • #15
nope... overpriced piece of good quality it really doesn't matter... even the cheap A$$ aluminumized steel will be just fine for you... if you do get steel, make sure it's 16 gague or thicker.... the Jegs Mustang products work really well... full catback w/ mufflers for like $170
 

Badlilstang

Founding Member
Feb 21, 2001
1,606
0
37
Spring , Texas
Apr 22, 2004
#16
  • Apr 22, 2004
  • #16
5.0_GT_kid said:
Thanks for the replies guys, I really appreciate the info. Would you recommend the Magnaflow catback?
Click to expand...


I love my magnaflow setup... didnt care to much for the 3.5" pipes out the back but the sound was great and unique. If you want it loud then magnaflow isnt the way to go unless your going to dump it.
 

viperos

New Member
May 19, 2003
2,943
0
0
Bellevue, WA (yes, the land where every 16 year o
Apr 22, 2004
#17
  • Apr 22, 2004
  • #17
personally, I was thinking of going w/ some 3" tips... but I would have to order some ones online, the weld ons, are 14" long, and about $60 a pop! so I went w/ some of the screw/weld ons at NAPA that ate 2.75" in diameter... to which I come to find out my stock TIPS are only 2.25" and my H Pipe is only 2"!!! WTF! anyway, just thought you'd be interested to know... the 2.75"ers look awesome!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Fox Mid Pipe
  • 93gtmustang
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
241
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 21, 2025
Mustang5L5
L
Is catback worth it over axle backs?
  • Lorencarson
  • May 15, 2025
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
641
2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk- May 15, 2025
89ripper
E
1986 Convertable 5.0 GT
  • eneerg
  • Sep 24, 2025
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
4
Views
220
The Welcome Wagon Sep 24, 2025
Noobz347
M
2001 v6 heater return pipe leak question
  • mnky99
  • Nov 11, 2025
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
1
Views
208
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Nov 11, 2025
mnky99
M
S
Preparation for Holley Terminator X install – Foxbody 306 (electrical fan, alternator, MSD Ignition, etc)
  • So_Flo
  • Mar 1, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
22
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 4, 2026
General karthief
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?