• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Experience With Ebay Wiring Harness?

  • Thread starter Thread starter IN2DEEP
  • Start date Start date Oct 23, 2017

IN2DEEP

New Member
Jan 1, 2004
26
1
3
Oct 23, 2017
#1
  • Oct 23, 2017
  • #1
Does anybody have any first hand experience with this harness or company?

https://www.ebay.com/itm/Ford-5-0-E...m35c93d2ee6:m:mBR6-uFFWApK3R-4LStDUfg&vxp=mtr

I realize I'm out of touch a little bit, as Ron Francis seems like a decent sized company. I received their catalog and they seem to be straight. But my car has turned into a money pit, and I'm trying to not spend money on another crappy part.

To give a little more over view, I have been chasing something that kills my ignition module. I feel as if I've replace everything possible, and still having issues. So my next move is to replace this portion of the engine wiring, and hopefully that will "atom bomb" whatever gremlin resides inside my systems......

Please weigh in....... thanks!
 

mikestang63

SN Certified Technician
Aug 27, 2012
11,606
8,859
214
In the garage
Oct 23, 2017
#2
  • Oct 23, 2017
  • #2
never heard of them, but SD was only up until 1987 or 88, not 92. If you have a Mass Air car you want a Mass Air harness and you want a harness for that specific year and transmission.
 
Reactions: IN2DEEP

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,216
17,899
224
Massachusetts
Oct 23, 2017
#3
  • Oct 23, 2017
  • #3
Seems like more of a generic harness of you stuff a 302 in a car that never had it.

Trying to integrate it into a factory setup may not go so well
 

90sickfox

Wasn't a pretty sight...and I've got big hands
SN Certified Technician
Mar 2, 2015
6,945
5,816
213
Oct 23, 2017
#4
  • Oct 23, 2017
  • #4
Um....what brand ignition module have you been using ? Actual OEM TFI modules have been the only ones that tend to live. I've been using one from Advance Auto for a while...but I had to get the correct heat sink paste ( white stuff ) from Autozone. Dielectric grease ( clearish white ) is not what is supposed to be put on them.

The salt and pepper shakers are also known to cause issues.

You really need to break out a multimeter and save yourself a few bucks.
 

IN2DEEP

New Member
Jan 1, 2004
26
1
3
Oct 23, 2017
#5
  • Oct 23, 2017
  • #5
mikestang63 said:
never heard of them, but SD was only up until 1987 or 88, not 92. If you have a Mass Air car you want a Mass Air harness and you want a harness for that specific year and transmission.
Click to expand...

My 5.0 is in a Jeep, and it came from a '90 Crown Vic (Speed density)..... manual transmission.
 

IN2DEEP

New Member
Jan 1, 2004
26
1
3
Oct 23, 2017
#6
  • Oct 23, 2017
  • #6
90sickfox said:
Um....what brand ignition module have you been using ? Actual OEM TFI modules have been the only ones that tend to live. I've been using one from Advance Auto for a while...but I had to get the correct heat sink paste ( white stuff ) from Autozone. Dielectric grease ( clearish white ) is not what is supposed to be put on them.

The salt and pepper shakers are also known to cause issues.

You really need to break out a multimeter and save yourself a few bucks.
Click to expand...

Since I've been having issues, I've been demanding Motorcraft modules. Initially it made a difference. But any more, none of them last long at all. I killed several on one long drive. I've been using the correct thermal paste (Artic Silver), I've tried junkyard (known good) distributors, new distributors, every sensor that I bump into has been changed. It's been a nightmare. I broke down and took it to a FORD mechanic, who has basically given up........ I would really like to get my Jeep back to running and being dependable like it's been the last 15+ years........ thanks for the heads up... I'll dig into the salt and pepper shakers......
 

90sickfox

Wasn't a pretty sight...and I've got big hands
SN Certified Technician
Mar 2, 2015
6,945
5,816
213
Oct 23, 2017
#7
  • Oct 23, 2017
  • #7
I think that crown Vic engine is also batch fire ( fires each bank for fuel control ) and it non- HO. Are you running an aftermarket camshaft ? Are you using the 90 crown Victoria computer ?

The reason I ask is because several things could cause the computer to do strange things to timing. That's all done through the TFI module. If its over working itself it could cause early failure....or if the wiring is jacked up increasing amperage through the module, or barely making contact flic

I'm also a Ford mechanic with all the info you need to completely rewire the ECU. I'm not the smartest guy on this forum... I say and do a lot of dumb stuff at times...but I know a lot about a little...if ya kno wut I mean.
 
Reactions: IN2DEEP

IN2DEEP

New Member
Jan 1, 2004
26
1
3
Oct 23, 2017
#8
  • Oct 23, 2017
  • #8
90sickfox said:
I think that crown Vic engine is also batch fire ( fires each bank for fuel control ) and it non- HO. Are you running an aftermarket camshaft ? Are you using the 90 crown Victoria computer ?

The reason I ask is because several things could cause the computer to do strange things to timing. That's all done through the TFI module. If its over working itself it could cause early failure....or if the wiring is jacked up increasing amperage through the module, or barely making contact flic

I'm also a Ford mechanic with all the info you need to completely rewire the ECU. I'm not the smartest guy on this forum... I say and do a lot of dumb stuff at times...but I know a lot about a little...if ya kno wut I mean.
Click to expand...

According to that harness' description, only the truck/broncos are batch firing. It states that I am to stick with my ECM, but the harness works for the HO firing order. NON-HO harness can be ordered. I'm not sure what would change in the harness for the firing order. I am not running an aftermarket camshaft.

I am running everything from the 90 Crown Vic including the ECM. I would not consider my wiring to be "jacked up" as it hasn't been butchered, or a fire, or anything. But it is 27 years old, and I'm having intermittent problems. I've had this Jeep for 20 years (EFI added in 2002) and it's not going away. So a fresh wiring harness seems like a good investment if it gives me back my dependable Jeep.

The Jeep has days where it runs good and is actually drivable. But the last time I touched it, it was running crazy RICH, and wouldn't pull itself from the garage. The mechanic has had it for a month, and has no answers.

I know exactly what you mean about "a lot about a little"...... that's where I live!
 
Reactions: 90sickfox

90sickfox

Wasn't a pretty sight...and I've got big hands
SN Certified Technician
Mar 2, 2015
6,945
5,816
213
Oct 24, 2017
#9
  • Oct 24, 2017
  • #9
The white and black salt and pepper shakers are a known issue with inconsistent issues.

A new harness would surely make a difference. Maybe, even an aftermarket ECU ( like Megasquirt ).

The Jeep with a 5.0 is cool as hell
 
Reactions: imp and IN2DEEP

imp

Mustang Master
Jul 13, 2017
531
105
83
Oct 24, 2017
#10
  • Oct 24, 2017
  • #10
90sickfox said:
The white and black salt and pepper shakers are a known issue with inconsistent issues.

A new harness would surely make a difference. Maybe, even an aftermarket ECU ( like Megasquirt ).

The Jeep with a 5.0 is cool as hell
Click to expand...

Jeeps around early '90s I think it was, came with T-5s! That meant, when I was building my '70 Bronco, I could use the 5.0HO and it's T-5, using the Jeep adaptor and Bronco Dana T.C. Turned out, Jeep used different-sized O/D gears, so I had to buy the gears and the adaptor, as well as output shaft. Went together well, ran like hell! That Bronco wound up in the Marine Corps with my nephew and is still running around somewhere by Camp Lejeune, NC! imp
 
Reactions: IN2DEEP and 90sickfox

IN2DEEP

New Member
Jan 1, 2004
26
1
3
Oct 28, 2017
#11
  • Oct 28, 2017
  • #11
imp said:
Jeeps around early '90s I think it was, came with T-5s! That meant, when I was building my '70 Bronco, I could use the 5.0HO and it's T-5, using the Jeep adaptor and Bronco Dana T.C. Turned out, Jeep used different-sized O/D gears, so I had to buy the gears and the adaptor, as well as output shaft. Went together well, ran like hell! That Bronco wound up in the Marine Corps with my nephew and is still running around somewhere by Camp Lejeune, NC! imp
Click to expand...

Yeah, Jeep used a version of the T5 transmission in the Wrangler. I went a similar route as my 78 CJ5 used a FORD "style" transmission. I just had to change the bellhousing to bolt up the engine. Ran carburetor for a few years, then graduated to the EFI........ She's pretty awesome... when she runs. haha
 

nelzfoxes

5 Year Member
Aug 20, 2013
472
325
94
Oct 28, 2017
#12
  • Oct 28, 2017
  • #12
I would switch to H.O. roller camshaft and A9L ecm. Then use Ford’s swap harness, part# M-12071-A50. That is what is in my Daddywagon.
 

Davedacarpainter

Chicks can make things hard if they’re inspired...
SN Certified Technician
Nov 28, 2015
11,833
11,633
203
Discordia
Oct 29, 2017
#13
  • Oct 29, 2017
  • #13
As to Ron Francis, they have outstanding wiring harnesses. They can custom build a wiring harness for your exact needs if you want. You won't have to settle for a generic harness that way. Every wire is labeled for where it goes, great system.

I haven't heard of the subsidiary company though, give Ron Francis a call.

https://www.ronfrancis.com/default.asp
 
Reactions: imp
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

1
Loose connection near the back of the alternator wiring harness
  • 1996 Stang GT
  • Sep 5, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
137
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Sep 5, 2025
1996 Stang GT
1
F
Electrical From scratch: alternator wiring
  • fox racer v2
  • Jun 23, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
0
Views
548
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jun 23, 2025
fox racer v2
F
Engine Ron Francis aka The Detail Zone and their Ford harnesses are beyond poor quality.Here's why.
  • CAMTWO1070
  • Oct 20, 2022
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
14
Views
5K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 13, 2022
CAMTWO1070
Electrical New Wiring Harness for '86 - recommendations needed
  • 68keyblr
  • Jun 7, 2021
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jun 8, 2021
mikestang63
Electrical In theory what ELECTRICALLY kills TFI modules?
  • IN2DEEP
  • Jul 25, 2021
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
22
Views
6K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 2, 2026
gkomo
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?