• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Fastest stock sn95 5.0 shootout

  • Thread starter Thread starter musclecarmaniac
  • Start date Start date Mar 14, 2006
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last
M

musclecarmaniac

New Member
Apr 26, 2004
26
0
0
Minny Soh Ta
Mar 15, 2006
#21
  • Mar 15, 2006
  • #21
Those are some awesome times. 13.5 is about what the bar is set at for a stock engine. My goal is to try to beat that this spring. Here are the pile off parts i'll throw at my car: Slicks/skinnies, T5 conversion, keep the 4.10s i put in, BBk longtubes, O/R h pipe, Already have a bbk CAI on it, subframe connectors (so i don't twist up the body), A shortbelt, up timing, And finally cheat with a little weight reduction.
 

Jackie Chan

I didn't read this.
Founding Member
Oct 17, 2002
2,507
4
48
Orlando, FL
Mar 15, 2006
#22
  • Mar 15, 2006
  • #22
im guessing my bolt on car wont count...because its still got a lot of et left in it
 
M

Monsterbishi

Member
Jan 17, 2006
107
3
18
Christchurch, New Zealand
Mar 15, 2006
#23
  • Mar 15, 2006
  • #23
Wow, talk about misleading subject line!

Stock == Unmodified
 

gcomfx.com

Founding Member
Oct 22, 2002
3,690
0
56
Republic, MO
Mar 15, 2006
#24
  • Mar 15, 2006
  • #24
Monsterbishi said:
Wow, talk about misleading subject line!

Stock == Unmodified
Click to expand...

x2
 

urban96

bubb rubb says:"woo woooooo"
Founding Member
Sep 24, 2002
3,464
1
69
Syracuse, NY
Mar 15, 2006
#25
  • Mar 15, 2006
  • #25
so basically untouched H/C/I?
 

NotQuik

Founding Member
Oct 21, 2000
5,158
29
88
Central Florida
Apr 24, 2007
#26
  • Apr 24, 2007
  • #26
from the dead I know....anybody gotten any new times since this thread?
 

The Green GT

No 13 year olds are safe around me.
10 Year Member
Jan 8, 2006
1,269
19
99
Louisiana
Apr 24, 2007
#27
  • Apr 24, 2007
  • #27
Killercanary said:
Purestock went 13.9 COMPLETELY stock in his '94 on street tires. He did remove the serp. belt and air silencer. This was also done at my home track that is a SOLID 2 tenths and 2mph slower than many others I frequent.
Click to expand...

How is that possible?
 
M

Monsterbishi

Member
Jan 17, 2006
107
3
18
Christchurch, New Zealand
Apr 25, 2007
#28
  • Apr 25, 2007
  • #28
The Green GT said:
How is that possible?
Click to expand...

As quickly as you can before it overheats I'd imagine
 
S

STM1965

Member
Mar 24, 2003
185
0
16
Ontario
Apr 25, 2007
#29
  • Apr 25, 2007
  • #29
Joe 5.0 said:
i havent done any real mods to it other than gears, wheels, and suspension, and all of those I did because i put it in a pond and had to replace stuff anyways.
Click to expand...

Ok I got to ask as about the pond story! It's got to be a good one
 
R

RACEME

Member
Jun 10, 2002
24
0
7
Apr 25, 2007
#30
  • Apr 25, 2007
  • #30
1Bad89Coupe said:
from the dead I know....anybody gotten any new times since this thread?
Click to expand...


Yeah 13.85 at 98 recently. the 13.5x pass was a one time deal that I never did duplicate fully. It only ran in the 50's one other time and that was a night run at Bradenton in florida in awesome air. 13.65+/- was all it would consistantly run.

I think 350+ passes on the same longblock is starting to show it age. Pretty sure the valve springs are shot. I am going to do a leakdown and compression test to make sure the short block is still alive then....

I am off to Cincy Speed today at lunch to get new heads. I have the trickflow stage 1 cam and performer intake on the workbench waiting, along with the fox intake swap stuff.
 

Killercanary

The car that set the bar.
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,676
1
76
Altoona, PA
Apr 25, 2007
#31
  • Apr 25, 2007
  • #31
The Green GT said:
How is that possible?
Click to expand...

What, the time or removing of the belt? If you ever saw this guy drive, you'd know how and why he can do it. He has since sold the car and is running his STOCK bottom end H/C/I 93GT. Here's a video of him running. After you see the times, keep in mind that this is a NA, stock shortblock, HCI car. Its light as hell, but its still impressive none-the-less. It makes ~350 to the wheels.

Again, this shows what a purpose built car can do with an increadible driver, the right suspension, gearing, tires, and overall combo. My dad is the white GT in the beginning of the video BTW and it too is a HCI NA 302.

http://s29.photobucket.com/albums/c289/molly_riva/?action=view&current=cecilspring2007scs_0001.flv
 

gcomfx.com

Founding Member
Oct 22, 2002
3,690
0
56
Republic, MO
Apr 25, 2007
#32
  • Apr 25, 2007
  • #32
Impressive! Nice vid.
 

The Green GT

No 13 year olds are safe around me.
10 Year Member
Jan 8, 2006
1,269
19
99
Louisiana
Apr 25, 2007
#33
  • Apr 25, 2007
  • #33
Killercanary said:
What, the time or removing of the belt? If you ever saw this guy drive, you'd know how and why he can do it. He has since sold the car and is running his STOCK bottom end H/C/I 93GT. Here's a video of him running. After you see the times, keep in mind that this is a NA, stock shortblock, HCI car. Its light as hell, but its still impressive none-the-less. It makes ~350 to the wheels.

Again, this shows what a purpose built car can do with an increadible driver, the right suspension, gearing, tires, and overall combo. My dad is the white GT in the beginning of the video BTW and it too is a HCI NA 302.

http://s29.photobucket.com/albums/c289/molly_riva/?action=view&current=cecilspring2007scs_0001.flv
Click to expand...

Im talking about the time. I didnt know that a SN-95 could pull a time like that.

Si it was bone stock except for the silencer?
 

badstang123

New Member
Jan 17, 2006
397
0
0
Santa Clarita, CA
Apr 25, 2007
#34
  • Apr 25, 2007
  • #34
That's a really good vid killercanary. There's some good runs in there. That last one is extremely impressive for a stock bottom 302. Good stuff
- Justin
 

Pokageek

Active Member
Jun 10, 2005
2,767
0
46
MA, USA
Apr 25, 2007
#35
  • Apr 25, 2007
  • #35
WOW! What a vid!!
 

Adam95GT

New Member
Aug 14, 2006
2,564
3
0
Burlington, NJ
Apr 26, 2007
#36
  • Apr 26, 2007
  • #36
my 14.4 @ 95 in my vert isnt bad for my mods... and milage
 

NotQuik

Founding Member
Oct 21, 2000
5,158
29
88
Central Florida
Apr 27, 2007
#37
  • Apr 27, 2007
  • #37
The Green GT said:
Im talking about the time. I didnt know that a SN-95 could pull a time like that.

Si it was bone stock except for the silencer?
Click to expand...

i agree that it is impressive, but definately believable....given a good driver and track...on a nice night. Alot of good times in this thread though.
 

Killercanary

The car that set the bar.
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,676
1
76
Altoona, PA
Apr 28, 2007
#38
  • Apr 28, 2007
  • #38
1Bad89Coupe said:
i agree that it is impressive, but definately believable....given a good driver and track...on a nice night. Alot of good times in this thread though.
Click to expand...


The interesting thing about Joe's (purestock) times were that they were done at Pittsburgh Raceway Park which is a SOLID 2 tenths and almost 2mph slower than other tracks around here like Cecil County. This 2 tenths difference has been proven time and time again by everyone that has run at both tracks. I'm not trying to benchrace here, but there isn't a doubt in my mind that if Joe had run at Cecil his times would have been even better.
 
R

RACEME

Member
Jun 10, 2002
24
0
7
Apr 28, 2007
#39
  • Apr 28, 2007
  • #39
Killercanary said:
The interesting thing about Joe's (purestock) times were that they were done at Pittsburgh Raceway Park which is a SOLID 2 tenths and almost 2mph slower than other tracks around here like Cecil County. This 2 tenths difference has been proven time and time again by everyone that has run at both tracks. I'm not trying to benchrace here, but there isn't a doubt in my mind that if Joe had run at Cecil his times would have been even better.
Click to expand...

I believe it. We have the same thing here in Cincinnati. My car along with many others will always run .15-.2 seconds faster at Tri-state than what it can run at Edgewater.
 
P

Pure Stock

New Member
Feb 5, 2006
4
0
2
Apr 29, 2007
#40
  • Apr 29, 2007
  • #40
The SN-95 Killercanary descibed in the previous posts belonged to me in the late 90's/early 2000. I purchased the 5-Liter with a scant 18,xxx miles. Timing was set at 10 degrees when checked on day of purchase. Air horn was also intact. The 8.8 contained a 3.08 cog from the factory. This was verified by me by spinning the rear tire one rotation vs. driveshaft rotation. The fox-4 was Vibrant red with a black cloth interior. This car had some weird options/deleted options. It had factory fog lights, pwr. windows/locks, AM/FM cassette, tilt, and a pwr. driver seat. The options missing were speed control, rear window defogger, A/C (factory non-A/C delete) and the Mach Audio.

As far as mods go, they were very limited. Adv. base timing, removed air horn and deleted serpentine belt. Stock sway bars, front and rear remained on the car and the end links were connected in the front as well. The car was raced with a 1/4 tank of Sunoco 93 at that time. No weight was dumped from the car. From the inception of trying to break into the 13 sec. zone I wanted a full weight (as delivered from the factory) car. Spare tire, jack, factory 16" waffles were all on the car. Pep Boys Futura GTX radial tires were the choice for rubber.

The best 60' was a 1.97 in the aformentioned trim. 1/4 mile e.t. was a 13.908@96.97 mph. It did crack 97 mph once (97.03) albeit with a slower e.t. Launch rpm was a conservative 4,000 -4,500 rpm

I would have loved to be able to run that car at a faster track and discover how much mph would have been gained.

Those three mods were the only mods done to the vehicle. Everything else was OEM factory stock.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Install Daytona Sensors CD-1 Ignition Mustang Fox SN95
  • revhead347
  • Sep 21, 2019
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
6
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 11, 2026
AeroCoupe
9
1/8th Mile Time?
  • 93lx308
  • Jan 12, 2018
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
8K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 23, 2018
RangerJoe
  • Locked
Expired 01 Cobra Fully Built 5.0 Stroker Socal
  • Doc Hawk
  • Feb 18, 2016
  • SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04)
Replies
0
Views
3K
SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04) Feb 18, 2016
Doc Hawk
Scca Autocross And Weight Reduction
  • TeamCaffeineGT
  • Oct 21, 2014
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
6
Views
5K
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Nov 3, 2014
TeamCaffeineGT
  • Locked
Just Some Suggestion's For Foxes
  • Detroiit
  • Jul 24, 2014
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 25, 2014
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?