• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

FedEx brought my intake! Ever seen one of these?

  • Thread starter Thread starter baglock1
  • Start date Start date Mar 20, 2004
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
B

baglock1

The Bartender
Founding Member
Aug 25, 2001
6,612
1
78
Space Coast, FL
Mar 20, 2004
#1
  • Mar 20, 2004
  • #1
The Roush 3-piece intake. Available on the 94-95 Stage 3 Roush cars, only about 100 (to my knowledge) were built and sold. Roush claimed a 47 hp increase with nothing other than this intake and the "kit" it came with.



Just for scale, that's a 65mm TB sitting next to it (included in the kit).


Crap, look at the lower runners on this thing!


Quotes from the 94-95 Roush sales brochure:
"65mm throttle body, high flow air filter, three-piece Roush dual plenum intake assembly."
Click to expand...

"47HP to your stock 5.0"! With GT-40 heads, up to 99HP, and with Roush CNC-ported GT-40 heads, up to a 120HP gain!
Click to expand...

Apply whatever reality modifier you want to the numbers. The actual dyno numbers I've seen are DAMN impressive.

The entire kit included:

3 Piece Intake, Lower, Mid and Upper
Gasket set, (intake, EGR, Throttle Body, IAB)
J4J1 EEC-IV Computer
MAF Extension Harness
IAB adapter plate
65mm Throttle Body
24lb Fuel Injectors
Fuel Rails
Passenger side Valve Cover
New Heater Pipe
Underdrive Crank Pulley
Serpentine Belt
Approximately 4ft of hose cut to different lengths (sizes per manual)
Assorted vacuum fittings
MAF to Throttle Body Hose and clamps
Air box and filter
Fuel Line disconnection tools
Installation Manual

I was able to get it complete, minus the crank pulley. The seller also threw in a Kirbin AFPR and FP gauge for the fuel rail. The original kits from Roush also had an option for the cowl hood (which bumped it to $3000 from $2000 ). Unfortunately, it won't fit under the stock hood, so it looks like I'll be getting another one of those before too long. Que the banana -->
 

94Blue302GT

Member
Oct 20, 2003
704
3
19
Chicago
Mar 20, 2004
#2
  • Mar 20, 2004
  • #2
Wow, that's really sweet looking! Where does the TB go even? How did you come by one? Throw it on there and tell us the gains you get just from the intake!
 

Slow5.0

Active Member
Feb 13, 2003
2,554
0
46
Portland, OR
Mar 20, 2004
#3
  • Mar 20, 2004
  • #3
Damn, nice intake man
 
B

baglock1

The Bartender
Founding Member
Aug 25, 2001
6,612
1
78
Space Coast, FL
Mar 20, 2004
#4
  • Mar 20, 2004
  • #4
94Blue302GT said:
Wow, that's really sweet looking! Where does the TB go even? How did you come by one? Throw it on there and tell us the gains you get just from the intake!
Click to expand...

You can see how the TB mounts a bit better in this pic:


I've been looking for one (at a decent price) for a couple years now. I've seen a few on Ebay but they all went for well north of $1000 and I didn't want to pay that. I finally found this one on another forum I frequent.

As soon as I get a chance, I need to have the car dyno'd again (I've added some parts since the last time). Once I do that, I'll install it and re dyno it. But considering how easy it is, I may just do the heads at the same time.
 

MLC Stang

Founding Member
Aug 23, 2002
210
0
0
Atlanta, GA
Mar 20, 2004
#5
  • Mar 20, 2004
  • #5
baglock1,

What are you going to do about the air intake?

That Roush kit came with a replacement HOOD!!! The air intake for the system was at the back edge of the replacement hood where it meets the front windshield. That big curved air filter bracket that you show in one of your pictures was a snap fit underneath that area of the new hood, and that was the air intake for the system.
 

Stangfreak95

add a 4
Founding Member
Nov 4, 2002
3,571
0
0
In your sister. If none, your mom
Mar 20, 2004
#6
  • Mar 20, 2004
  • #6
Performance wise, its very interesting but I gotta tell you I hate the look of it. Maybe its just me that is too used to the regular intakes ..
 
W

wytstang

Mustang Master
Mar 14, 2004
4,988
4
78
Summerville,SC missing South Fl. weather :(
Mar 20, 2004
#7
  • Mar 20, 2004
  • #7
 

Dan95-5.0

Active Member
Jun 14, 2003
1,110
0
36
Manitoba, Canada
Mar 20, 2004
#8
  • Mar 20, 2004
  • #8
thats pretty odd how the throttle body mounts in the middle facing towards the back.

i remember looking in an old mag. that had a trickflow intake that had two throttle boddies. looked kind of like a 94-95 intake with the elbow but it was on both sides. that think looked like a beast.

that polished would look sweet
 
B

baglock1

The Bartender
Founding Member
Aug 25, 2001
6,612
1
78
Space Coast, FL
Mar 20, 2004
#9
  • Mar 20, 2004
  • #9
MLC Stang said:
What are you going to do about the air intake?
Click to expand...

The cowl hood isn't much of a concern when you plan on doing something like this:

ON EDIT: Looks like there's some problems linking the pic. Here's the site instead: http://home.tampabay.rr.com/jfrank01/mustang/jf1.html

However, I'll probably still run this N/A for awhile and if so, I've found that some guys have run the Cobra R hood with slight modification and it worked fine.

Let me see if I can dig up a decent pick of how the induction is supposed to look.
 
B

baglock1

The Bartender
Founding Member
Aug 25, 2001
6,612
1
78
Space Coast, FL
Mar 20, 2004
#10
  • Mar 20, 2004
  • #10
Here we go


but I gotta tell you I hate the look of it.
Click to expand...

Everyone's entitled to their opinion. Personally, I think the thing looks badass just because it isn't at all like any of the Edelbrock, Trickflow, or FRPP intakes you see out there. When you consider the power advantage over them, it's an easy choice for me. Even if I hated the looks though, the power would more than makes up for it.

Coincidently though, a chevy buddy of mine said the same thing. I told him that with as much as his hood is open, he should be concerned about the looks.
 

Stangfreak95

add a 4
Founding Member
Nov 4, 2002
3,571
0
0
In your sister. If none, your mom
Mar 20, 2004
#11
  • Mar 20, 2004
  • #11
I admit that it looks way better in the engine bay, with the air filter and everything. Would look REALLY good chrome.
 

red94fiveo

New Member
Apr 12, 2003
1,269
0
0
Wichita, KS
Mar 20, 2004
#12
  • Mar 20, 2004
  • #12
THat looks a hundred times better in the engine bay like that.

If you don't mind me asking how much did that whole setup run you and where did you get it (ebay?)

Thats going on the turbo'd 331 in the works, isn't it?
 

1105

I AM the random post master...bow down
May 3, 2003
3,841
0
0
Daytona Bch, FL
Mar 20, 2004
#13
  • Mar 20, 2004
  • #13
Damn man, thats a sweet intake. I cant ever bring myself to pay $2000 just for an intake, but it truely is bad ass.
 

randomjoker

New Member
Sep 12, 2003
427
0
0
Oklahoma
Mar 20, 2004
#14
  • Mar 20, 2004
  • #14
nice, tell us the results pleaseeee.
 

Numbles

Active Member
Dec 10, 2003
998
0
36
Chicago, IL
Mar 20, 2004
#15
  • Mar 20, 2004
  • #15
That is absolutly badass. Look really balanced compared to seing a cold air intake jetting into the fender...
 
B

baglock1

The Bartender
Founding Member
Aug 25, 2001
6,612
1
78
Space Coast, FL
Mar 20, 2004
#16
  • Mar 20, 2004
  • #16
red94fiveo said:
THat looks a hundred times better in the engine bay like that.
Click to expand...

Compared to what? The pic of it sitting on the asphalt or another intake?

red94fiveo said:
If you don't mind me asking how much did that whole setup run you and where did you get it (ebay?)
Click to expand...

I paid a little over $900 after shipping. Keep in mind though that it came with a 65mm TB (even if it is an Edelbrock/BBK unit ), 24# injectors, the Cobra computer, and an assload of other little parts. It came in three boxes about 1' x 2' x 3' weighing 33# each. I got it from somebody on another forum I frequent.

red94fiveo said:
Thats going on the turbo'd 331 in the works, isn't it?
Click to expand...

Yeppers. A lot of the stuff in this kit will be useless when I finally build the short block and strap on the turbo (24# injectors and a high boost stroker spells B-O-O-M-!) so I figure I'll get at least $300 back from selling off the unused.
 

randomjoker

New Member
Sep 12, 2003
427
0
0
Oklahoma
Mar 20, 2004
#17
  • Mar 20, 2004
  • #17
sounds good.
 

jmuva44

Founding Member
Nov 25, 2000
1,338
0
36
Richmond, VA
Mar 20, 2004
#18
  • Mar 20, 2004
  • #18
Looks kinda like that BBK intake that was posted a while back....very nice and unique piece.
 

VibrantRedGT

"STANGNET'S PENGUIN SMACKER"
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
14,679
424
154
Boca Raton, Florida
Mar 20, 2004
#19
  • Mar 20, 2004
  • #19
Gorgeous! I always loved that intake. Next time I'm heading North on business I'm stopping by to see it.
 

Zero Signal

Active Member
Feb 24, 2003
2,633
2
46
Tucson, AZ
Mar 20, 2004
#20
  • Mar 20, 2004
  • #20
That thing is crazy wierd, I like it. I love the semetrical design.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

M
01 mustang 3.8 fuel pressure issue
  • Mhaley2006
  • May 29, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
176
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Yesterday at 4:50 PM
mnky99
M
Resolved 93 Mustang 5.0 - Cranks but does not start
  • dan50
  • Jul 18, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
160
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 18, 2026
dan50
Engine Popping noise in the intake. Frustrated still.
  • esteban31065
  • Apr 6, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
15
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 23, 2025
gkomo
F
For Sale 2018-2022 Mustang GT 5.0L Stock Intake Manifold Assembly
  • FordFlyer
  • Dec 30, 2024
  • S550 Mustangs for Sale (2015+)
Replies
0
Views
580
S550 Mustangs for Sale (2015+) Dec 30, 2024
FordFlyer
F
SURGING IDLE / NO IDLE CHECKLIST FOR 1996–1998 MUSTANG GT (4.6L 2V) - Work In Progress
  • Noobz347
  • Aug 30, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
759
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Aug 30, 2025
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?