• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech

Figured out how to kill a 2.3

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ranchero5.0
  • Start date Start date Aug 2, 2005

Ranchero5.0

The Voice of Reason
Jan 1, 1999
5,306
0
76
Hagerstown MD
Aug 2, 2005
#1
  • Aug 2, 2005
  • #1
In my boat (see other thread). Took it out on the water last Friday and it was 'ok' for about the first half mile, then it started to miss a little and would only rev to 4200rpm (@40mph). Another mile and it was missing a good bit, finally slid the engine cover back to see if anything obvious was wrong. Had a little steam coming out the PCV breather, figured it had a bad head gasket so I removed the oil fill cap and it dang near went over the stern. Motor cleared right up, but it looked like a steam locomotive coming out the oil fill. Guess the last owner didn't winterize it correctly and it froze up. He also forgot to mention it when I bought it. Did a U turn and took it home. Pulled it down over the last few days and the head has visibly cracks at the bolt bosses between 2+3 and a crack in the oil return line. The head gasket was cutting between 1+2 and had water tracks from 2+3 to their water passages. Inside the block on 2+3 the bore has massive cracks running around the bore precisely where the ring lands were when it froze up. I easily caught my fingertips on the cracks. I'm honestly surprised it didn't explode at 4200rpm under load. It's a real pity because the motor was clean enough to eat off of inside and out. I'll try to get some pics once it's on the stand tomorow and I have the lift plate off the bores.

I have a late 80's ranger on order out of a local towing yard for $50 with a 2.3 in it that I plan on dropping in for the rest of this season, then building a good motor for next year. Tough little motor to run that hard with steam shooting out the top.

Jamie
 

351wcoupe

New Member
Feb 13, 2003
1,811
0
0
Manhattan, Kansas
Aug 2, 2005
#2
  • Aug 2, 2005
  • #2
So now would be a great time to dig up a turbo motor. Just think....
instead of 70-80hp you could be cruising around with 175-195hp.
 

Keasbey

Member
Jun 12, 2003
915
0
16
Montreal
Aug 2, 2005
#3
  • Aug 2, 2005
  • #3
My friend got a 351C in his boat... awesome
 
1

140CILX-Coupe

New Member
Mar 30, 2005
189
1
0
Aug 2, 2005
#4
  • Aug 2, 2005
  • #4
351 you know hes talking about a boat right?
 

Red_LX

I’m not much help unless you’re looking for ****!
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,896
73
129
Morgantown, WV...where couches meet their doom
Aug 2, 2005
#5
  • Aug 2, 2005
  • #5
Actually, you didn't kill the engine...

That's the funny thing about a 2.3L. I don't think they stop running until they lock up or blow a hole in the block.
 

351wcoupe

New Member
Feb 13, 2003
1,811
0
0
Manhattan, Kansas
Aug 2, 2005
#6
  • Aug 2, 2005
  • #6
140CILX-Coupe said:
351 you know hes talking about a boat right?
Click to expand...
sure

Why not?

I have a local mini pulling tractor guy that wants me to set him up with a nasty 2.3T plus spray, on a LAWN MOWER. WHAT A RIDE!!!!!
 

Shawneebear93

20+ Year Stangneter
May 4, 2004
518
17
49
Salisbury Twp, Allentown, PA
Aug 2, 2005
#7
  • Aug 2, 2005
  • #7
351wcoupe said:
sure

Why not?

I have a local mini pulling tractor guy that wants me to set him up with a nasty 2.3T plus spray, on a LAWN MOWER. WHAT A RIDE!!!!!
Click to expand...
John Deere? Never heard of him. Really, though, why would you want that for a lawnmower!?
 

351wcoupe

New Member
Feb 13, 2003
1,811
0
0
Manhattan, Kansas
Aug 2, 2005
#8
  • Aug 2, 2005
  • #8
They have mini pulling contests and they have an open class with bone stock small blocks or built 4 cyl. It gets a little wild.
 

Ranchero5.0

The Voice of Reason
Jan 1, 1999
5,306
0
76
Hagerstown MD
Aug 3, 2005
#9
  • Aug 3, 2005
  • #9
Motor with a carb and mallory distributor and flat top pistons is rated at 128hp.

Figure a little port work and a cam and I should be able to get one over 140 NA.

Jamie
 

Ranchero5.0

The Voice of Reason
Jan 1, 1999
5,306
0
76
Hagerstown MD
Aug 3, 2005
#10
  • Aug 3, 2005
  • #10
I was actually considering a blowthrough turbo setup, except I'm not sure about water jacketting the turbo housing. Seems the turbo works off of heat energy and the jacket is designed to remove heat energy. I could fab a turbo header pretty quick with an air gap between the water jacket and the exhaust, but it's gonna be a bear doing something similiar to the tubo housing. An open motor compartment isn't an option.

Jamie
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
760
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
1
Engine Motor swap from a 2003 Explorer
  • 1996mustang new
  • Oct 9, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
549
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 16, 2025
squeak93
What in gods green earth happend to my N/A 2.3?
  • Piranahbite
  • Mar 24, 2024
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech
Replies
8
Views
2K
2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech Jun 1, 2024
Piranahbite
L
Engine Need help diagnosing 2 dead cylinders
  • lvgnmz
  • Feb 13, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
435
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 13, 2025
Mustang5L5
Progress Thread 351w Build, 67 Coupe
  • redstang67
  • Oct 4, 2024
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
3
Views
336
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Oct 5, 2024
89ripper
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?