- May 3, 2003
- 393
- 0
- 0
Ok i know we've all heard WAY too mcuh about this but i figured what the hell? Ok first of all i don't claim in to be very educated in politics at all, and i do plead igonorance for some things( electoral votes, FTF ? ho does that work) But it seems the most like things to happen are..
1.Bush, we know what he thinks, we have a war on "terror" that must be won. So he is goin to keep guys in Iraq for as long as it takes... but too do what ? he really has no long term plan. He is wageing a war on some thing that is impossible to win! does he really thing he can rid the world of "terror" is he really that ignortant? the debt is 47 billion ? in a few years won't the debt be huge and make the dollar worth a LOT less? Isn't that basicly why the depression of the 30's got started ?
2. Kerry,....hm who knows no reall goals stated, who know what he whould do with all the troops in iraq...he seems to have no goals excpets talk trash about bush..
Wow what a great couple of choice, Sorry for the rant but it really seems that were in trouble either way.. wish i had a choice i could feel good about..
Anybodys thoughts ?
1.Bush, we know what he thinks, we have a war on "terror" that must be won. So he is goin to keep guys in Iraq for as long as it takes... but too do what ? he really has no long term plan. He is wageing a war on some thing that is impossible to win! does he really thing he can rid the world of "terror" is he really that ignortant? the debt is 47 billion ? in a few years won't the debt be huge and make the dollar worth a LOT less? Isn't that basicly why the depression of the 30's got started ?
2. Kerry,....hm who knows no reall goals stated, who know what he whould do with all the troops in iraq...he seems to have no goals excpets talk trash about bush..
Wow what a great couple of choice, Sorry for the rant but it really seems that were in trouble either way.. wish i had a choice i could feel good about..
Anybodys thoughts ?