• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-

First Mustang Build. Need Help!

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jayson Mesecar
  • Start date Start date Jul 13, 2016
J

Jayson Mesecar

New Member
Jul 13, 2016
5
0
1
Jul 13, 2016
#1
  • Jul 13, 2016
  • #1
I'm new to the forum so sorry if this is the wrong place to post this.
I'm currently in the works of putting together a mustang build. I'm looking for some guiding advice.
The basic rundown iv come up with so far.
I want to build a 302 that's direct injected to as close to 350hp as possible.
I want to put that 302 in a 95-99ish mustang.
I need some help on determining what I need to build that motor to 350hp. My budget for the emgine itself if 2500-3000 USD.
 

Adieu

Easy there, this ain't a dating site.
20+ Year Stangneter
Mar 7, 2002
9,531
5,187
224
Jul 14, 2016
#2
  • Jul 14, 2016
  • #2
Jayson Mesecar said:
I'm new to the forum so sorry if this is the wrong place to post this.
I'm currently in the works of putting together a mustang build. I'm looking for some guiding advice.
The basic rundown iv come up with so far.
I want to build a 302 that's direct injected to as close to 350hp as possible.
I want to put that 302 in a 95-99ish mustang.
I need some help on determining what I need to build that motor to 350hp. My budget for the emgine itself if 2500-3000 USD.
Click to expand...
You won't be able to build a direct injected 302.

Direct injection uses special injectors to inject fuel directly into the cylinder head that are fed by a cam-driven fuel pump that builds as much as 2500psi of pressure. There isn't a cylinder head out there for the 302 with the necessary ports, nor is there any kit to add a DI pump to one.

Direct Injection is awesome, but Ford had been slow on the uptake of the technology even on their latest engines (compared to Hyundai, Kia, Volkswagen, and others that DI their whole lineup) and the aftermarket hasn't yet, and likely never will begin offering retrofits to older designs like the 302 (which last saw production use in the Explorer/Mountaineer in 2000) due to the fact that it wouldn't be cost effective to design new cylinder heads for direct injection.

As far as making 350hp from a 302, that is easy. The throttle-body injected 302 in my Mustang II is there while still running iron heads. Car Craft magazine made 400hp from a 302 with the stock cam still in it (running AFR heads).
 
Last edited: Jul 14, 2016
J

Jayson Mesecar

New Member
Jul 13, 2016
5
0
1
Jul 14, 2016
#3
  • Jul 14, 2016
  • #3
I apologize. I posted the thread right before I went to sleep. I meant fuel injected.
 
J

Jayson Mesecar

New Member
Jul 13, 2016
5
0
1
Jul 14, 2016
#4
  • Jul 14, 2016
  • #4
74stang2togo said:
You won't be able to build a direct injected 302.

Direct injection uses special injectors to inject fuel directly into the cylinder head that are fed by a cam-driven fuel pump that builds as much as 2500psi of pressure. There isn't a cylinder head out there for the 302 with the necessary ports, nor is there any kit to add a DI pump to one.

Direct Injection is awesome, but Ford had been slow on the uptake of the technology even on their latest engines (compared to Hyundai, Kia, Volkswagen, and others that DI their whole lineup) and the aftermarket hasn't yet, and likely never will begin offering retrofits to older designs like the 302 (which last saw production use in the Explorer/Mountaineer in 2000) due to the fact that it wouldn't be cost effective to design new cylinder heads for direct injection.

As far as making 350hp from a 302, that is easy. The throttle-body injected 302 in my Mustang II is there while still running iron heads. Car Craft magazine made 400hp from a 302 with the stock cam still in it (running AFR heads).
Click to expand...
How much cheddar did it take you to reach that in your mustang?
 

Adieu

Easy there, this ain't a dating site.
20+ Year Stangneter
Mar 7, 2002
9,531
5,187
224
Jul 14, 2016
#5
  • Jul 14, 2016
  • #5
Jayson Mesecar said:
How much cheddar did it take you to reach that in your mustang?
Click to expand...
What I basically have is this: http://mustangsandmore.com/ubb/BudgetSmallBlock.html but with ported heads, bigger valves, a better cam, roller rockers, and EFI.

Granted, Alex wrote that a number of years ago, so prices have gone up since then, and PAW is out of business, but you could still do the same basic build today relatively cheaply. If you want EFI, just add $2000-2500 to your budget if you want a bolt-on kit, or $300-1000 if you're resourceful and willing to hunt for a lot of specific parts at junkyards, swap meets, and Ebay. If you decide to go with one of the TBI kits, I'd say not to get the MSD Atomic EFI system that I have. Damned thing is too limiting and tempermental, it's like having a really fancy carburetor that cost 8 times as much as a good old Holley or Edelbrock. If I drive the car somewhat regularly, it calms down, "learns" what it needs to, and is pretty nice, but my Mustang isn't my daily driver and frequently sits for weeks at a time, and every time it does I have to use the throttle to start it and keep it going, just like with a carburetor.

If you're wanting an SN95 Mustang (94-98), you can get a factory EFI 302 car if you go '94 or '95. The only bad part about those is the factory computer. A '96-98 car would have either the 3.8L V6 or the 4.6L V8. In either case you'd have to find a 94-95 crossmember (or go aftermarket) to make a 302 fit, and good luck getting it smogged in states/counties that do that.
 
J

Jayson Mesecar

New Member
Jul 13, 2016
5
0
1
Jul 14, 2016
#6
  • Jul 14, 2016
  • #6
I found a kit from summit racing recommended in another thread that will fit my budget and work with a 95'. What is wrong with the factory comouter in these? And what would you suggest to correct its flaw
 

Adieu

Easy there, this ain't a dating site.
20+ Year Stangneter
Mar 7, 2002
9,531
5,187
224
Jul 14, 2016
#7
  • Jul 14, 2016
  • #7
Jayson Mesecar said:
I found a kit from summit racing recommended in another thread that will fit my budget and work with a 95'. What is wrong with the factory comouter in these? And what would you suggest to correct its flaw
Click to expand...
The '94 and '95 5.0L Computers don't play well with modifications. The fix is usually to find a '93 computer and harness, a custom dyno-tune, or a standalone ECU such as Megasquirt.
 
J

Jayson Mesecar

New Member
Jul 13, 2016
5
0
1
Jul 15, 2016
#8
  • Jul 15, 2016
  • #8
74stang2togo said:
The '94 and '95 5.0L Computers don't play well with modifications. The fix is usually to find a '93 computer and harness, a custom dyno-tune, or a standalone ECU such as Megasquirt.
Click to expand...
Thanks so much. Very helpful information. I will probably go the dyno tune route. Now time to get building!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

H
Forced Induction On3 Turbo Kit- Parts list NEEDED - 302 Stock Motor
  • Hirothecool1
  • Feb 27, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
884
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 7, 2026
slow84lx
S
J
Wheels-Tires Need Some Help - Brakes Upgrade/Wheel fitment
  • jaygee15
  • Dec 8, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 3 4 5
Replies
81
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 6, 2026
AeroCoupe
A
Discussion on mild budget build/ top end
  • Acesario
  • Feb 21, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
663
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 23, 2026
General karthief
J
Help Figuring Motor Choice(Possible future turbo)?
  • jaygee15
  • Dec 14, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
483
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 3, 2026
Jarhead67
J
351w turbo build.... Turbo guys teach me things...
  • Kid wita 5oh
  • Oct 22, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 23, 2025
General karthief
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?