• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Fl820 oil filters shrinking!

  • Thread starter Thread starter Killa
  • Start date Start date May 4, 2009

Killa

Active Member
Jul 9, 2007
1,006
56
49
May 4, 2009
#1
  • May 4, 2009
  • #1
just read from other site. I might go grap a few at my local walmart before they change to midget version. Or use mobil 1 and never look back.


Filter Diameter (in.)
3.78
3.78
Filter Length (in.)
4.04 OLD
3.72 NEW
Thread Size (mm / in.)
22 / 1.5
22 / 1.5
Anti Drain Back Valve Material
Silicone
Silicone
Efficiency @ 20 Microns (%)
80%
80%
Capacity (grams)
8
8
Burst Pressure (PSI)
200
200

all this just to save a few buck ? wtf
 

BlownFiveLiter

have car, will race....wait, it doesn't run
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
3,133
18
108
Chicagoland
May 4, 2009
#2
  • May 4, 2009
  • #2
So they're just as efficient, but .32" shorter? I don't see a problem with that. It's probably just a different supplier, but still made to specifications supplied by Ford.
 
B

bdcardinal

tree hugger
Jun 10, 2003
3,612
16
69
santa barbara, CA
May 4, 2009
#3
  • May 4, 2009
  • #3
the official word from ford is that it assits in removal and install on certain applications.
 

281CI96Coupe

Member
Oct 30, 2006
233
0
16
May 5, 2009
#4
  • May 5, 2009
  • #4
thats cool to know
 

trinity_gt

10 Year Member
Jan 31, 2003
3,125
81
99
Canada
May 5, 2009
#5
  • May 5, 2009
  • #5
Strange that they carry exactly the same part number. Typically, in engineering land, a new p/n is warranted when form, fit and/or function changes.

Perhaps Ford sees them as interchangeable, that any application using the short one will accept the old, long one even if they're harder to swap.
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,216
17,899
224
Massachusetts
May 5, 2009
#6
  • May 5, 2009
  • #6
trinity_gt said:
Strange that they carry exactly the same part number. Typically, in engineering land, a new p/n is warranted when form, fit and/or function changes.

Perhaps Ford sees them as interchangeable, that any application using the short one will accept the old, long one even if they're harder to swap.
Click to expand...

I agree. It should at least get a new revision number
 

squeak93

15 Year Member
Jun 2, 2005
2,266
364
164
Joplin, Missouri
May 5, 2009
#7
  • May 5, 2009
  • #7
I know on my 5.4 4x4 f150 its hard to get a filter wrench in there. So a shorter one will likely help!
 
J

jomull55

New Member
May 20, 2007
202
0
0
lucas, OH
May 5, 2009
#8
  • May 5, 2009
  • #8
trinity_gt said:
Strange that they carry exactly the same part number. Typically, in engineering land, a new p/n is warranted when form, fit and/or function changes.

Perhaps Ford sees them as interchangeable, that any application using the short one will accept the old, long one even if they're harder to swap.
Click to expand...

they probably didn't want to change the part # because it would confuse all the noobs at autozone. but when i last bought my filter they had both types there.
 

flstang65

10 Year Member
Dec 6, 2007
1,484
135
94
SE Georgia
May 5, 2009
#9
  • May 5, 2009
  • #9
As long as it is equally efficient, it doesn't bother me.
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,216
17,899
224
Massachusetts
May 5, 2009
#10
  • May 5, 2009
  • #10
jomull55 said:
they probably didn't want to change the part # because it would confuse all the noobs at autozone. but when i last bought my filter they had both types there.
Click to expand...


I'm not talking about the Fl-820S number. That can stay

But the F1AZ-6731-BD number should be revised. -BD is Ford's internal revision code. Usually 1st time parts are - AA. i think a change in external lenght definitely justifies a revision number
 
B

bdcardinal

tree hugger
Jun 10, 2003
3,612
16
69
santa barbara, CA
May 5, 2009
#11
  • May 5, 2009
  • #11
Mustang5L5 said:
I'm not talking about the Fl-820S number. That can stay

But the F1AZ-6731-BD number should be revised. -BD is Ford's internal revision code. Usually 1st time parts are - AA. i think a change in external lenght definitely justifies a revision number
Click to expand...

when the long number changes, the short one does as well.
 

trinity_gt

10 Year Member
Jan 31, 2003
3,125
81
99
Canada
May 5, 2009
#12
  • May 5, 2009
  • #12
Mustang5L5 said:
I'm not talking about the Fl-820S number. That can stay

But the F1AZ-6731-BD number should be revised. -BD is Ford's internal revision code. Usually 1st time parts are - AA. i think a change in external lenght definitely justifies a revision number
Click to expand...

Yup. From an engineering POV, the bills of material for the short and the long are different: Different stampings are used for the outer case or there's an additional trimming step to shorten the long stamping down. As well, the tooling and process required to make the long and the short would be different, from the equipment handling the filters during assembly to the robots spraying them with powdercoat.

I wouldn't think Ford would care all that much about NAPA and Autozone. I'm surprised that the supplier of the filter itself didn't demand some sort of revision to the filter part number due to the physical differences. How does Ford track this? How does it know what's been installed when the part numbers are the same?
 
R

rwood126

Member
Feb 20, 2009
161
3
16
mCdONOUGH, GA.
May 5, 2009
#13
  • May 5, 2009
  • #13
This is the memo we got from Ford


April 6, 2009

To: All Ford and Lincoln Mercury Dealers, Parts Departments, Service Departments
Subject: Motorcraft Oil Filter Product Change – FL820S

MOTORCRAFT OIL FILTER PRODUCT CHANGE FOR THE FL820S
The length of Motorcraft oil filter FL-820S (F1AZ-6731-BD) is being reduced, allowing for easier removal and installation. There are no changes to the performance attributes of the oil filter.

The smaller filter size will also result in the pallet quantity being increased by one layer or 120 pieces.

The chart below provides a summary of the changes:

Motorcraft 820S

Filter Specifications
Current
New

Filter Diameter (in.)
3.78
3.78

Filter Length (in.)
4.04
3.72

Thread Size (mm / in.)
22 / 1.5
22 / 1.5

Anti Drain Back Valve Material
Silicone
Silicone

Efficiency @ 20 Microns (%)
80%
80%

Capacity (grams)
8
8

Burst Pressure (PSI)
200
200







Pallet Changes



Carton Quantity
12
12

Cartons per Layer
10
10

Layers per Pallet
9
10

Pieces per Pallet
1,080 pieces
1,200 pieces





Changes are in red





Attachment provides visual comparisons of the filter and packaging changes.

QUESTIONS
Contact your Parts and Service Zone Manager or Shane Nelson, snelson@ford.com; (313)845-0465.
 

IIGood

Founding Member
Aug 1, 1998
4,252
1,214
224
Churchton, MD
May 9, 2009
#14
  • May 9, 2009
  • #14
I just picked one of the new ones up today while getting supplies for an oil change.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Timing Cover/harmonic Balancer Removal And Replacement
  • jrichker
  • May 28, 2017
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
1
Views
15K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 6, 2024
Noobz347
Ford Racing Oil Filter?
  • [Twitch]
  • Mar 29, 2006
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
32
Views
6K
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Apr 4, 2006
tag4car
PI Headswap Write-Up
  • 5spd GT
  • Aug 26, 2007
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
36
Views
67K
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech May 4, 2020
Thomas Camp
T
have any of you ever tried this?if so did it work?
  • 408gt91
  • Sep 24, 2007
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 24, 2007
408gt91
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?