• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Flaring a 65 Fastback?

  • Thread starter Thread starter fastbacker
  • Start date Start date Oct 30, 2007
F

fastbacker

New Member
Nov 29, 2003
2
0
0
san francisco
Oct 30, 2007
#1
  • Oct 30, 2007
  • #1
I'm looking to get another inch of track per side on my 65 fastback but don't want it to look flared. Has anyone stretched their quarters by pushing out their wheelhouses and quarters? I'd love to see what was done and how it came out.

Thanks-
Craig Backer
 

CraigMBA

New Member
Mar 24, 2007
783
1
0
Orange, CA
Oct 30, 2007
#2
  • Oct 30, 2007
  • #2
You mean flaring the fenders 1" and then painting them with the invisable flare hiding paint? I think that's the same stuff they used on Wonder Woman's Invisable Jet.



Ok, seriously.......you can either leave the fenders stock, you can flare them, or you can roll the fender lips flat on the inside. I flaring them just an inch will leave them obviously not stock. I knew a guy who radically lowered his car in the early 1990's who went to the trouble to cut off and re radius his wheel openings, but that was a little over the top even now.

What exactly wheel and tire package are you trying to fit?
 

coolblue65

Founding Member
Jul 26, 1999
1,224
2
39
Algonquin, IL
Oct 30, 2007
#3
  • Oct 30, 2007
  • #3
fastbacker said:
I'm looking to get another inch of track per side on my 65 fastback but don't want it to look flared. Has anyone stretched their quarters by pushing out their wheelhouses and quarters? I'd love to see what was done and how it came out.

Thanks-
Craig Backer
Click to expand...

They did on the Total Control Products car, I really like it:



More here: http://www.totalcontrolproducts.com/vehicles/tcpracecar/modifications.html
 

Attachments

  • tcp16.webp
    18.5 KB · Views: 518

CochinoFilipino

Founding Member
Jan 14, 2002
171
2
19
CA
Oct 31, 2007
#4
  • Oct 31, 2007
  • #4
Didn't someone use 67/68 quarter panels on a 65/66?
 

65 fastback

Founding Member
Mar 17, 2002
1,347
0
37
Northern VA
Oct 31, 2007
#5
  • Oct 31, 2007
  • #5
CochinoFilipino said:
Didn't someone use 67/68 quarter panels on a 65/66?
Click to expand...


Actually they used '67 inner wheel well panels and stretched the stock '65 quarter panels over them. I think it yielded about an inch and remained very stock looking. I'll see if I can find the thread and post a link later.

Tim
 

mustbereel

Member
May 6, 2005
318
0
17
Escondido, CA
Oct 31, 2007
#6
  • Oct 31, 2007
  • #6
65 fastback said:
Actually they used '67 inner wheel well panels and stretched the stock '65 quarter panels over them. I think it yielded about an inch and remained very stock looking. I'll see if I can find the thread and post a link later.

Tim
Click to expand...

That was me. Here's the thread about using the 67/68 outer wheel housings to push out the stock 65 quarter panels.

http://forums.stangnet.com/showthread.php?t=677887

Here's a side by side comparison:

-

This was quite a bit of work and wouldn't recommend it unless you were already replacing the quarter panels.

I think it gave me about 1.5" extra on each side.

Here' a shot of the finished product. You really can't tell that it isn't stock unless you have a stock car next to it.

 

Attachments

  • fbquarter2.webp
    2.6 KB · Views: 346
  • exterior.webp
    78.1 KB · Views: 400
  • cpquarter2.webp
    3.3 KB · Views: 293

iskwezm

10 Year Member
May 24, 2005
4,159
20
79
Rowland Heights,California
Oct 31, 2007
#7
  • Oct 31, 2007
  • #7
ooh, I like that
 

65 fastback

Founding Member
Mar 17, 2002
1,347
0
37
Northern VA
Oct 31, 2007
#8
  • Oct 31, 2007
  • #8
Mustbereel,

Thanks for posting. Your car is looking great and love your quarter panel mod!
What size tires can you fit in the rear?

Tim
 

mustbereel

Member
May 6, 2005
318
0
17
Escondido, CA
Oct 31, 2007
#9
  • Oct 31, 2007
  • #9
65 fastback said:
Mustbereel,

Thanks for posting. Your car is looking great and love your quarter panel mod!
What size tires can you fit in the rear?

Tim
Click to expand...

I have 275/40/17 on 17x9.5" rims. There is room on the inside for a larger tire but the foward strut of the Heidt's IRS gets in the way. I could have ordered the IRS with a narrower track width but didn't realize at the time that it would be necessary. I probably could have gained another inch on each side.
 
F

fastbacker

New Member
Nov 29, 2003
2
0
0
san francisco
Oct 31, 2007
#10
  • Oct 31, 2007
  • #10
mustbereel said:
That was me. Here's the thread about using the 67/68 outer wheel housings to push out the stock 65 quarter panels.

http://forums.stangnet.com/showthread.php?t=677887

Here's a side by side comparison:

-

This was quite a bit of work and wouldn't recommend it unless you were already replacing the quarter panels.

I think it gave me about 1.5" extra on each side.

Here' a shot of the finished product. You really can't tell that it isn't stock unless you have a stock car next to it.

Click to expand...

Now that's what I'm talking about! Very cool!
 

Attachments

  • fbquarter2.webp
    2.6 KB · Views: 328
  • cpquarter2.webp
    3.3 KB · Views: 333
  • exterior.webp
    78.1 KB · Views: 373

rusty428cj

10 Year Member
Sep 29, 2007
943
265
104
Port Richey Fl
Nov 1, 2007
#11
  • Nov 1, 2007
  • #11
I'm building a 68 coupe and flared the fenders about 1 1/4" and the quarters. The fenders are alot easier. I used a cutoff wheel and cut the fender in the middle of the flare but left it attached at the bottom about 1/4" - 1/2" Spread it out the distance I wanted and welded in a patch. Did the same on the rear except you also have to cut the wheel house and patch that first and than the outter quarter.









 

Attachments

  • 16.webp
    42.3 KB · Views: 1,319
  • 18-2.webp
    10.6 KB · Views: 325
  • 19.webp
    35.8 KB · Views: 324
  • 21-3.webp
    36.8 KB · Views: 315

mustbereel

Member
May 6, 2005
318
0
17
Escondido, CA
Nov 1, 2007
#12
  • Nov 1, 2007
  • #12
rusty428cj said:
I'm building a 68 coupe and flared the fenders about 1 1/4" and the quarters. The fenders are alot easier. I used a cutoff wheel and cut the fender in the middle of the flare but left it attached at the bottom about 1/4" - 1/2" Spread it out the distance I wanted and welded in a patch. Did the same on the rear except you also have to cut the wheel house and patch that first and than the outter quarter.




I really like this idea and am tempted to try it on my 67. It just looks like an awful amount of grinding.
Click to expand...
 

Attachments

  • 19.webp
    35.8 KB · Views: 2,691

rusty428cj

10 Year Member
Sep 29, 2007
943
265
104
Port Richey Fl
Nov 1, 2007
#13
  • Nov 1, 2007
  • #13
This is how it looks now with most of the body work finished. It still has to be blocked and primed a few times.


 

Attachments

  • 30-1.webp
    22.7 KB · Views: 295

RMODEL65

Member
Jul 6, 2005
313
1
18
brunswick ga
Nov 1, 2007
#14
  • Nov 1, 2007
  • #14
i used maier racing flares they were glass and i purchased the whole front fender View attachment 351380
View attachment 351382
View attachment 351384
View attachment 351386
View attachment 351387
 
R

ron67fb

Founding Member
Aug 3, 2001
1,117
0
36
SF Bay area, CA
Nov 2, 2007
#15
  • Nov 2, 2007
  • #15
RMODEL65 said:
i used maier racing flares they were glass and i purchased the whole front fender
Click to expand...
It's about time you posted decent images of your car. Are those the 1.5" ones? The 3" ones which go halfway up the quarter panel look hideous to me. I thought the 1.5s would do the same but yours looks good.
 
T

twuxtop

New Member
Aug 17, 2005
50
0
0
Nov 3, 2007
#16
  • Nov 3, 2007
  • #16
?

mustbereel said:
That was me. Here's the thread about using the 67/68 outer wheel housings to push out the stock 65 quarter panels.

http://forums.stangnet.com/showthread.php?t=677887

Here's a side by side comparison:

-

This was quite a bit of work and wouldn't recommend it unless you were already replacing the quarter panels.

I think it gave me about 1.5" extra on each side.

Here' a shot of the finished product. You really can't tell that it isn't stock unless you have a stock car next to it.

Click to expand...


what would a narrower track width do to the g handling? can you pull a g or near? good stuff thanks.
 

Attachments

  • exterior.webp
    78.1 KB · Views: 760
  • cpquarter2.webp
    3.3 KB · Views: 313
  • fbquarter2.webp
    2.6 KB · Views: 299
A

Applejack

New Member
Dec 11, 2005
32
0
0
White Lake, MI
Nov 3, 2007
#17
  • Nov 3, 2007
  • #17
Track width is a factor in weight transfer on that axle. Increasing the width, decreases weight transfer. Doing this on one end or the other can be used to tune the balance.
 

mustbereel

Member
May 6, 2005
318
0
17
Escondido, CA
Nov 3, 2007
#18
  • Nov 3, 2007
  • #18
twuxtop said:
what would a narrower track width do to the g handling? can you pull a g or near? good stuff thanks.
Click to expand...


I doubt I can pull anywhere near 1g. Perhaps with some really sticky tires but I would expect more like .85-.9g as it is. If I had decreased the track by 2" and put 1" wider tires in the outside-outside dimension would be the same. This probably would have had little effect on road holding. There may have been undesireable effects on bump steer and camber change due to the shorter control arms.
 

67Thunder

New Member
Jun 19, 2005
101
0
0
Vancouver, Canada
Nov 3, 2007
#19
  • Nov 3, 2007
  • #19
I did mine only it's a'67

It took a long long time to get it right. I think there are afew pics of the process on this site.

I would not recommend it to the faint of heart. I moved the inner wheel houses in an inch and cleared the front portion of the inner wheelhouse, which usually angles back towards the tire. Instead now the wheelhouse is even all the way around.
I widened the outer wheelhouse and moved the quarter out (stretching it) this was about all I could do unless I performed surgery with a cutter.

There's some pics with a 17 x 11" rim I tested a few weeks back. I can fit a 315-35-17 or 295-30-18 no problem, now.
 

RMODEL65

Member
Jul 6, 2005
313
1
18
brunswick ga
Nov 4, 2007
#20
  • Nov 4, 2007
  • #20
ron67fb said:
It's about time you posted decent images of your car. Are those the 1.5" ones? The 3" ones which go halfway up the quarter panel look hideous to me. I thought the 1.5s would do the same but yours looks good.
Click to expand...

yeah they are 1.5 inch i was going for a weight savings and thats the reason iwent went with the glass front instead of molding them in the entire front end except for the headlight buckets are glass heres a couple more pics View attachment 350688
View attachment 350690
View attachment 350692
View attachment 350694
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

G
Intro and FB questions
  • gflat65
  • Nov 16, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
187
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Nov 25, 2025
horse sence
U
Newbie, considering a '65 fastback
  • unclescratch
  • Nov 6, 2024
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
2
Views
190
The Welcome Wagon Nov 13, 2024
Watton8293
W
J
2004 Mustang 3.8L V6 vibrations above 65 MPH and differential leaks
  • joeybuddy96
  • Mar 16, 2026
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
13
Views
383
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Yesterday at 2:45 PM
joeybuddy96
J
T
Fox Convertible top issues
  • TDM389
  • Feb 15, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
242
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 15, 2026
General karthief
How Many Runs For A Built C-4
  • 93gtmustang
  • Apr 19, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
9
Views
590
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 15, 2025
revhead347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?