• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech

Flexible exhaust tubing?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 4cMadness
  • Start date Start date Nov 20, 2006
4

4cMadness

New Member
Aug 21, 2006
35
0
0
Nov 20, 2006
#1
  • Nov 20, 2006
  • #1
Hey, my current exhaust has holes in it, could I just remove the whole exhaust, and just hook up a piece of flexible exhaust tubing directly on the manifold, and mount it somewhere under the engine bay? Any ideas what that would sound like, how it would run? My exhaust now has lots of holes and rattles quite a bit. Hell maybe it'd be a good idea to just get rid of the exhaust all together and let the exhaust fly right out of the manifold. Anything would have to sound better than that rattling tinny sound.
 

Red_LX

I’m not much help unless you’re looking for ****!
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,896
73
129
Morgantown, WV...where couches meet their doom
Nov 20, 2006
#2
  • Nov 20, 2006
  • #2
Flexible exhaust pipe is crap, and it's illegal in some states (you aren't allowed to use it here).

Your car would have no power, sound like crap and be VERY loud if you had no exhaust behind the manifold, or just a short piece of pipe.

Why don't you just get a new exhaust put on it?
 
4

4cMadness

New Member
Aug 21, 2006
35
0
0
Nov 20, 2006
#3
  • Nov 20, 2006
  • #3
wasn't aware that it was that horrible, (though I did doubt it's value since it's so cheap) I just figured until I can get around to getting an exhaust perhaps it would be sort of a quick fix type thing. I know a shop that does good work for fairly cheap that put the exhaust on my truck, but I want to spend my cash on a good performance exhaust for the mustang ( I'm hoping on playing with the engine later, nothing really extreme, just my first hot rod project type deal ). While we're on the subject of exhausts though, and since mine is crap, I've been searching on the forums, about the ford ranger manifold swap. Given that there are no other mods right now besides a homemade cai, and a slightly advanced timing, would it be worth it to swap manifolds?
 

Red_LX

I’m not much help unless you’re looking for ****!
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,896
73
129
Morgantown, WV...where couches meet their doom
Nov 20, 2006
#4
  • Nov 20, 2006
  • #4
Bolt ons are really not worth much on these cars...as far as performance exhaust goes, it's not worth much either. You can do exhaust for a better sound but other than that it's not gonna get you much. Might as well just do a stock replacement exhaust with a different muffler or something.
 

rd

Founding Member
Jan 12, 2000
3,316
63
109
Ocean Springs MS
Nov 22, 2006
#5
  • Nov 22, 2006
  • #5
The exhaust parts for these 2.3 cars are cheap at parts stores. I think the muffler and tailpipe for mine were $35 or so.

Also check with someone or a shop that does 5.0 conversions, they should have 4 cyl exhaust stuff laying around cheap, or better.

I would not use the flex, as it will flex back out of shape, and it hard to seal on the ends, and won't support anything else, like the muffler. It's usually considered major ghetto.
 

65ShelbyClone

Founding Member
Sep 9, 2000
4,675
38
119
Antelope Valley, SoCal
Nov 25, 2006
#6
  • Nov 25, 2006
  • #6
rd said:
I would not use the flex, as it will flex back out of shape, and it hard to seal on the ends, and won't support anything else, like the muffler. It's usually considered major ghetto.
Click to expand...

Ditto that. When I had my '65 notchback, the POs put some ghetto turbomuffler dumps under it......by attaching the stock downtubes to about 12" of flex pipe and then onto the rest of the hard tube. It broke quite a few times and eventually rotted. The fact that it rotted in this part of CA says a lot. The car didn't have a single speck of rust anyywhere.
 
4

4cMadness

New Member
Aug 21, 2006
35
0
0
Nov 28, 2006
#7
  • Nov 28, 2006
  • #7
Thanks for all the answers, I'm probably just going to have everything from the headers back replaced with straight pipe, no cats or mufflers. No problems with emissions down here. Only question now is style. Traditional, side exhaust, ... or....stacks like on a big rig !!!
 

65ShelbyClone

Founding Member
Sep 9, 2000
4,675
38
119
Antelope Valley, SoCal
Nov 28, 2006
#8
  • Nov 28, 2006
  • #8
2.3s sound like tractors, why would you want an open exhaust? It would sound a lot better with a muffler under there.
 
4

4cMadness

New Member
Aug 21, 2006
35
0
0
Nov 28, 2006
#9
  • Nov 28, 2006
  • #9
65ShelbyClone said:
2.3s sound like tractors, why would you want an open exhaust? It would sound a lot better with a muffler under there.
Click to expand...

To unleash the full potential of four yep, count'em FOUR 22hp apiece cylinders of blazing mechanical fury, with which to peel asphalt from the road.
Actually it's just because I'm cheap, short on funds, and the shop where I get my exhaust work done will charge me less for open exhaust, because they don't have to sell me a muffler if there's no muffler being installed.
 

Red_LX

I’m not much help unless you’re looking for ****!
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,896
73
129
Morgantown, WV...where couches meet their doom
Nov 28, 2006
#10
  • Nov 28, 2006
  • #10
Well it'll sound like crap but, enjoy. I'd at least throw on a cheap turbo muffler if I was going to the trouble of installing a new exhaust.
 

Slow92LX

New Member
Apr 1, 2005
49
0
0
Where ever I roam
Nov 30, 2006
#11
  • Nov 30, 2006
  • #11
save up and geta nice system from Stinger
 
4

4cMadness

New Member
Aug 21, 2006
35
0
0
Dec 5, 2006
#12
  • Dec 5, 2006
  • #12
If I'm going to do it, I guess I may as well do it right. And since I might end up doing the turbo conversion later, I think I might go with a larger pipe as well. What diameter is the stock exhaust anyways? And how much larger could I safely go right now with n/a, assuming I MAY do a turbo swap within say 9 or 10 months?
 

65ShelbyClone

Founding Member
Sep 9, 2000
4,675
38
119
Antelope Valley, SoCal
Dec 5, 2006
#13
  • Dec 5, 2006
  • #13
2 1/2" is about as big as you would want for a non-turbo engine and is slightly larger than the stock turbo exhaust(which was ~2 1/4").
 

Shawneebear93

20+ Year Stangneter
May 4, 2004
518
17
49
Salisbury Twp, Allentown, PA
Dec 6, 2006
#14
  • Dec 6, 2006
  • #14
I'm running a 2.5" system ... some say 2.25" is better but since my header collector is 2.5" I figured I may as well have the rest the same. However, most recommend a 3" when it comes turbo time.
 

Stinger

Founding Member
Jul 7, 2001
7,754
24
118
Basehor (Kansas City), KS
Dec 6, 2006
#15
  • Dec 6, 2006
  • #15
If you are converting to turbo soon, I wouldn't put any significant time/money into the n/a system as it won't work with the turbo setup anyway...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

1
Engine Motor swap from a 2003 Explorer
  • 1996mustang new
  • Oct 9, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
597
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 16, 2025
squeak93
J
Emission problems
  • jls.zmmr
  • Feb 5, 2026
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
2
Views
247
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Feb 7, 2026
AeroCoupe
M
  • Locked
2001 evap core tube support
  • mnky99
  • Sep 4, 2025
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
349
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Sep 5, 2025
mnky99
M
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
46
Views
3K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jul 16, 2026
Noobz347
What's your tow rig?
  • LILCBRA
  • May 31, 2026
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
3
Views
134
Other Auto Tech May 31, 2026
LILCBRA
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?