• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Flow Dynamics 101:...engineers Welcome

  • Thread starter Thread starter CarMichael Angelo
  • Start date Start date Jan 31, 2018

CarMichael Angelo

my rearend will smell so minty fresh,
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
10,641
8,909
234
Birmingham, al
Jan 31, 2018
#1
  • Jan 31, 2018
  • #1
I'm trying to determine how big of a box that I'll have to make to cover the throttle bodies, and how big of an round opening will be required to adequately provide air to them.

I don't even know where to start...thinking maybe a 5-6" wide base that runs the length of the 6 throttle bodies. A short side of probably 2" and a long side of 3.5" will run the length of the thing. A flat top that'll end up being 3x24". The reason I want to do a long side/short side is because the throttle bodies are angled at 45 degrees, and I want the top on the same plane that the valve cover will be.

So,...you have this metal box encapsulating the throttle bodies. The volume of that box probably equivalent to a 24" piece of 3.5" exhaust tubing. At the front of the metal box, there'll be a 3" diameter tube that'll do a dog leg drop, and turn out 90* with a K&N style Conical filter capping off the end of the thing.

Will a 3" tube be adequate to provide air to this thing?

Does anybody have any thoughts here?
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,167
17,861
224
Massachusetts
Jan 31, 2018
#2
  • Jan 31, 2018
  • #2
Picture of TB setup? Are you making a plenum over the TBs

estimated CFM you think engine would move at WOT?
 

CarMichael Angelo

my rearend will smell so minty fresh,
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
10,641
8,909
234
Birmingham, al
Jan 31, 2018
#3
  • Jan 31, 2018
  • #3
Mustang5L5 said:
Picture of TB setup? Are you making a plenum over the TBs

estimated CFM you think engine would move at WOT?
Click to expand...


The box in question will be the "plenum" I guess. Each TB will have a bellmouth'd entrance.

As far as CFM,...I'm clueless. Each of the TB's have 2" blades.
 

90sickfox

Wasn't a pretty sight...and I've got big hands
SN Certified Technician
Mar 2, 2015
6,945
5,816
213
Jan 31, 2018
#4
  • Jan 31, 2018
  • #4
Well.... there's more to exhaust than there is to intake. The fuel that's sprayed isn't accounted for in the intake volume.

What size is your exhaust ?

I would think the 3in intake pipe would be big enough. The box would need to be atleast 2in off the top of the throttle bodies. Any closer and i think the air turbulence will affect your airflow.

I'm no engineer but ....
 

General karthief

wonder how much it would cost to ship you a pair
Mod Dude
Aug 25, 2016
27,828
10,508
203
polk county florida
Jan 31, 2018
#5
  • Jan 31, 2018
  • #5
What size tube did the tbs breathe through in their original configuration?
 

CarMichael Angelo

my rearend will smell so minty fresh,
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
10,641
8,909
234
Birmingham, al
Jan 31, 2018
#6
  • Jan 31, 2018
  • #6
karthief said:
What size tube did the tbs breathe through in their original configuration?
Click to expand...
3",...but it was force'd in.
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,167
17,861
224
Massachusetts
Jan 31, 2018
#7
  • Jan 31, 2018
  • #7
This isn't my area of expertise, but the key is keeping the air velocity up through the intake track and into the throttle bodies. Too large of a plenum and you slow the air down before it enters. It would require a lot of testing to determine the effects of this. However, if I had to come up with a rough first draft...I'd do something like the setup to the left in this photo


3" diameter can support a lot of airflow provided not a lot of bends and distance. I'm assuming you are just doing a short filter to plenum opening for your intake duct.
 

RaggedGT

Been here over a DECADE and still no CT
Mod Dude
Jul 20, 2014
4,733
3,175
203
Taylorsville ky
Jan 31, 2018
#8
  • Jan 31, 2018
  • #8



 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,167
17,861
224
Massachusetts
Jan 31, 2018
#9
  • Jan 31, 2018
  • #9
^^ KISS theory
 

RangerJoe

I leave the horn on while driving
15 Year Member
Apr 26, 2010
2,560
1,146
184
Georgia
Feb 1, 2018
#10
  • Feb 1, 2018
  • #10
Anderson sells their cheaper power pipe at 3". I would think that since it can feed a 400hp 5.0L motor, it could feed your 300hp 6 cylinder.

Joe
 

srtthis

the guy doing it does every local racers rear end
15 Year Member
Jul 3, 2009
5,129
1,666
204
Maryland
Feb 1, 2018
#11
  • Feb 1, 2018
  • #11
you should be fine with a 3" pipe for how much air youll need to move, those 2" throttle bodies will flow way more than each cylinder will actually take or at least should. IIRC a 90mm throttle body flows something like 1500CFM. and you have the cross section of a 305mm throttle body LOL
 

hoopty5.0

mechanicus terribilis
15 Year Member
Dec 14, 2010
7,762
6,928
214
SW Houston
Feb 1, 2018
#12
  • Feb 1, 2018
  • #12
Some 3" PVC, 1/4" Acrylic sheets, and an oven. Use the PVC as your jig, form the acrylic into a half moon, make sides and then attach it to a sheet metal base.

https://www.wikihow.com/Easily-Mold-Acrylic-Plastic-Sheets


Similar to this:
 

CarMichael Angelo

my rearend will smell so minty fresh,
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
10,641
8,909
234
Birmingham, al
Feb 1, 2018
#13
  • Feb 1, 2018
  • #13
RaggedGT said:



Click to expand...
So, what does everybody think about this idea? 6 of these breathing the air under the hood. Period. The fact that I have a flow through system that lets air in at the front, and lets air right back out at the rear, and considering that my exhaust is on the other side of the engine...heat would be somewhat less than what a V8 compartment would experience.
 
Reactions: RaggedGT and General karthief

95BlueStallion

My assy trans to myself
15 Year Member
Feb 22, 2007
5,125
3,091
214
Cedar Rapids, Iowa
Feb 1, 2018
#14
  • Feb 1, 2018
  • #14
I think I would start simple with air filters on each TB. Get it running, and then since you know it runs well, play with the box idea and see how it is affected.
 

HotFox

15 Year Member
Jan 5, 2009
1,047
647
164
SE Michigan
Feb 1, 2018
#15
  • Feb 1, 2018
  • #15
Just make sure you have provisions for the air cleaners to catch the fuel and oil residue from the blow back.
 

srtthis

the guy doing it does every local racers rear end
15 Year Member
Jul 3, 2009
5,129
1,666
204
Maryland
Feb 1, 2018
#16
  • Feb 1, 2018
  • #16
dont think fuel injection will have the issues pulling fuel out like a carb does hence why the fuel injected nitrous race cars no longer use scoops
 

HotFox

15 Year Member
Jan 5, 2009
1,047
647
164
SE Michigan
Feb 1, 2018
#17
  • Feb 1, 2018
  • #17
I meant the reversion that will take place due to sizing, single unshared runners. Fuel will want to come back and bouce off the back of the butter fly. Let me just say this will be a miserable for drivability down at low Rpms. Having all those butterflies cracked at low RPM to try and maintain any kind of velocity. Mike should understand why this setup looks cool in a Museum NOT running and NOT on a cruiser. It will make peak power way higher then what the cam is ground for let alone what the crank and rods could handle at that rpm.
 
Reactions: RangerJoe

CarMichael Angelo

my rearend will smell so minty fresh,
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
10,641
8,909
234
Birmingham, al
Feb 1, 2018
#18
  • Feb 1, 2018
  • #18
HotFox said:
I meant the reversion that will take place due to sizing, single unshared runners. Fuel will want to come back and bouce off the back of the butter fly. Let me just say this will be a miserable for drivability down at low Rpms. Having all those butterflies cracked at low RPM to try and maintain any kind of velocity. Mike should understand why this setup looks cool in a Museum NOT running and NOT on a cruiser. It will make peak power way higher then what the cam is ground for let alone what the crank and rods could handle at that rpm.
Click to expand...
These came off of a car that had them...all six of them, on a daily driven street car. That was fully 1 liter smaller than the Monster. The low speed drivability of a 2006 BMW M3 has never been an issue...I do not see why it would be here.
 
Last edited: Feb 1, 2018
Reactions: General karthief

a91what

SendMeUrDataLog
10 Year Member
Apr 6, 2011
10,739
6,720
214
Hillsborough county
Feb 1, 2018
#19
  • Feb 1, 2018
  • #19
 

droopie85gt

Hookers and Beer for life!
5 Year Member
Dec 26, 2016
1,028
818
153
Cordova, TN
Feb 1, 2018
#20
  • Feb 1, 2018
  • #20
I'm of the test the itb theory in action first, and if you are satisfied with the driveability then work on a box. So just some simple filters to start with.
 
Reactions: General karthief and RangerJoe
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

S
Help with window and possible engine
  • StefRena22
  • Jun 12, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
19
Views
791
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 21, 2025
Willybill32
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
F
Getting my old autocrosser running again
  • flightops
  • Aug 28, 2025
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
6
Views
233
The Welcome Wagon Aug 28, 2025
Noobz347
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
670
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 28, 2026
Noobz347
M
Progress Thread mnky99 2001 V6 evap core, ac compressor, heater core replacement
  • mnky99
  • Sep 5, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
424
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Sep 5, 2025
mnky99
M
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?