• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Flow numbers for aftermarket intake???

  • Thread starter Thread starter 84convertablegt
  • Start date Start date May 13, 2005

84convertablegt

New Member
Nov 6, 2004
589
0
0
Columbus, OH
May 13, 2005
#1
  • May 13, 2005
  • #1
Anyone know where you can find a compilation of specs for aftermarket intake manifolds for sbf intakes. i.e. performer, p rpm, weiand stealth,and others. before i run out and buy something besides my performer, iwant to make sure it will really make a good bit of difference.
 

Dark Knight

Founding Member
Feb 1, 2000
2,578
0
0
Chandler, Az.
May 13, 2005
#2
  • May 13, 2005
  • #2
http://www.carbdford.com/viewtopic.php?t=4742
flow numbers alone dont mean alot. a vic jr will flow great, but probably slow your car down.. low port velocity.. my vert ran slower with the RPM than it does with the performer.. even with the AFR heads.. a little work on the ports of the performer helps alot..

a stealth would work for you too..
 

84convertablegt

New Member
Nov 6, 2004
589
0
0
Columbus, OH
May 13, 2005
#3
  • May 13, 2005
  • #3
ok, well i realize flow numbers wont do it all, and there are other things to consider such as single plane versus dual and your individual cam and heads and all that. basically what im looking for is whether or not it is really worth going to a weiand stealth or other over a performer in my situation. if im only gonna gain 5 hp, its not worth it. do u get what im saying? my setup is stock heads, performer cam, holley 670 carb, 2200 rpm stall converter, 3.55 gears. i still think the performer works better than a stock intake just from the seat of pants feeling, but will anything actually work better for a low rpm power motor. dual plane is probably where i want to stay
 

Dark Knight

Founding Member
Feb 1, 2000
2,578
0
0
Chandler, Az.
May 13, 2005
#4
  • May 13, 2005
  • #4
if you have room under the hood, you might try a 4-hole and an open 1" spacer.. the open will give you more top end.. the 4-hole usually pics up the TQ.. I have a 1/2" phenolic one on my performer.. and I matched the intake ports to the heads..
 

84convertablegt

New Member
Nov 6, 2004
589
0
0
Columbus, OH
May 13, 2005
#5
  • May 13, 2005
  • #5
actually i already have exactly what you are talking about. i have a 1" phenolic 4 hole spacer i cant really tell if it helps or not, but im sure it keeps the heat down a tad off of the carb
 

Max Power

Active Member
Jul 31, 2003
1,774
1
36
St Paul
May 13, 2005
#6
  • May 13, 2005
  • #6
To be honest, if you are running stock heads, I think you have all the intake you need.
 

84convertablegt

New Member
Nov 6, 2004
589
0
0
Columbus, OH
May 13, 2005
#7
  • May 13, 2005
  • #7
Max Power said:
To be honest, if you are running stock heads, I think you have all the intake you need.
Click to expand...
yeah, i probably agree but am always looking for some way to help until i can afford some heads and something that will work with new heads as well. my heads were opened up a tad on the exhaust side when they were rebuilt but the valves are still stock size.

By the way darknight thanks for the intake info. thats what i was looking for!
 

84convertablegt

New Member
Nov 6, 2004
589
0
0
Columbus, OH
May 13, 2005
#8
  • May 13, 2005
  • #8
Dark Knight said:
http://www.carbdford.com/viewtopic.php?t=4742
Click to expand...
According to this test the weiand was def. the best, but the question is, which weiand is it? the xcellerator or stealth or what. i know the test wa quite awhile ago, does anyone know? Dark Knight?
 

Dark Knight

Founding Member
Feb 1, 2000
2,578
0
0
Chandler, Az.
May 13, 2005
#9
  • May 13, 2005
  • #9
http://www.jason.fletcher.net/tech/intakes/intakes.htm

full article..
 

84convertablegt

New Member
Nov 6, 2004
589
0
0
Columbus, OH
May 13, 2005
#10
  • May 13, 2005
  • #10
thanks
 

Jonstantine

Founding Member
Jul 20, 2002
487
0
0
Oklahoma
May 14, 2005
#11
  • May 14, 2005
  • #11
Dark Knight said:
http://www.carbdford.com/viewtopic.php?t=4742
flow numbers alone dont mean alot. a vic jr will flow great, but probably slow your car down.. low port velocity.. my vert ran slower with the RPM than it does with the performer.. even with the AFR heads.. a little work on the ports of the performer helps alot..

a stealth would work for you too..
Click to expand...
[sarcasm] but the performer is worse than a 40 year old stock ford intake [/sarcasm]

*also remember, that article is from 1988
that weiand intake has a part # listed in the article
fletcher said it is similar to the edelbrock torker 1 (you can tell from pictures also)
 

84convertablegt

New Member
Nov 6, 2004
589
0
0
Columbus, OH
May 14, 2005
#12
  • May 14, 2005
  • #12
im just gonna stay with the performer for now. i replaced a 40 year old 2bbl cast manifold and i know its better than that
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
876
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
R
1974 Datsun 620 pickup / 5.0L HO
  • RJH46
  • Aug 24, 2025
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
1
Views
238
Other Auto Tech Aug 24, 2025
Noobz347
5
Hello Everyone !
  • 5150K
  • Jul 3, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
0
Views
75
The Welcome Wagon Jul 3, 2026
5150K
5
S
Engine Stalls when downshifting/coasting
  • Scott_S
  • Nov 5, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
11
Views
708
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 6, 2025
Mustang5L5
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?