• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Flowtech headers, any good?

  • Thread starter Thread starter BlackFox5.0
  • Start date Start date Oct 23, 2004

BlackFox5.0

Founding Member
Aug 7, 2000
3,514
1
0
Massachusetts
Oct 23, 2004
#1
  • Oct 23, 2004
  • #1
I have a set of these on my other block, at least thats what I think they are.

They have pretty large primaries, which are oval shaped. they are full flange as well. The only thing I don't like about them is the header bolt clearences. They were installed with allen head bolts, some of which were grinded down to fit. Also the mounting side of the flange didn't look so good to me. At the ports they are raised, like the welds were not grinded smooth. I saw a pair on ebay that said these were a sort of "o-ring seal". It sounds like a good idea, but I don't know about how well it would work...Any thoughts? I need to replace my Mac headers, the studs for the h-pipe have rusted to nothing.
 

90mustangGT

I felt sorry for girls because
Founding Member
Jan 15, 2002
2,773
17
89
Dallas, GA
Oct 23, 2004
#2
  • Oct 23, 2004
  • #2
spend the extra cash and get some BBK's. Some have had luck, but most have had problems.
 

TrickStang37

New Member
Oct 17, 2004
292
0
0
Oct 23, 2004
#3
  • Oct 23, 2004
  • #3
are they the same as the Summit headers?
 

N8Miller

I need NOS....make it 2 of the big ones
Founding Member
Jul 26, 2000
2,661
0
0
Kingston, PA, USA
Oct 23, 2004
#4
  • Oct 23, 2004
  • #4
they are prolly the same as summit or Macs.

anyway, flowtechs are good for the price.
 

conartist

Member
Dec 4, 2002
77
0
6
Windsor, Ontario, Canada
Oct 24, 2004
#5
  • Oct 24, 2004
  • #5
I spoke with summit tech a while ago and they told me their's
and flowtech's hedders are identical.
 

TrickStang37

New Member
Oct 17, 2004
292
0
0
Oct 24, 2004
#6
  • Oct 24, 2004
  • #6
ive had good results with the summit, just quality control sucks ass. on my first set they went on very easily but one header tube (cylinder 8) would just slightly tap the steering shaft when the wheel would be turned. I also had to clean up the ports, the welding was pretty bad. on my most recent set, the ports looked great. but, when i went to install, one of the tubes (cylinder 5) was bent too far in and the header would not sit flush on the head. had to grind a small part (1/4 in) of the motor mount bracket for it to fit. THEN i had grind/cut the flange so the bolt would slip in from under. THEN had to pound the header right near the port so the bolt would have enough room to spin (tighten).

Other than that, they fit great!!! LOL
 

Michael Yount

Mustang Master
Apr 10, 2002
9,039
6
79
Charlotte, NC
Oct 24, 2004
#7
  • Oct 24, 2004
  • #7
I have a set of their block hugger headers; I'm gonna need to try the right side header on mine to gain some clearance for a larger head pipe. The quality looks about right for the price in my opinion - low price, low quality. I've got a lot of weld cleaning up to do with the grinder, and I'll take it to a machine shop and have the flange milled flat. Not only is it not 'true' (a straight edge laid across it has a good 1/16" gap at one end - can you say header leak?), but those raised 'o-ring' seals don't look like a good idea to me. All that gets done only after a test fit. If it won't fit, I'll put them back on ebay - and perhaps I'll get the $60 I paid for them back.
 

04sleeper

Founding Member
Jun 22, 2002
2,674
14
89
Dallas, TX
Oct 24, 2004
#8
  • Oct 24, 2004
  • #8
Flowtech is owned by Holley. Here is one review I read online about their headers.
Reviewed by: Adam
Year: 1988
Model: Mustang GT
Price Paid: $0
Summary:
I am a profesional mechanic and have installed many sets of headers, these are the absolute worst I have ever seen. They are poorly made, the paint was rubbed off right out of the box, had to sand, repaint and heat cure. Also they fit very poorly, welds are terrible, pipe fitment is all off, leaked at collector connection. Had to remove from car and extensivily modify to get them to seal properly.

Strengths:
None, should have spent more money to buy a better set.

Weaknesses:
To many to list

Similar Products Used:
Hedman, Doug Thorely, Hooker, BBK, etc.
Click to expand...


This was enough to make me look elsewhere.
 

BlackFox5.0

Founding Member
Aug 7, 2000
3,514
1
0
Massachusetts
Oct 24, 2004
#9
  • Oct 24, 2004
  • #9
Looks like I'll be selling them then lol. Like I said they are on my other block, which I plan to build up a little.

Anyways, I figured I'd ask first, because I don't like my Macs, and I had these laying around.

What are good headers anyways? I never bought a pair before, my Macs were given to me, and of course the Flowtechs were on my notch's old motor. My friend has FMS P headers for his GT-40P's and I like how they look as far as quality goes, and the paint on his looks like it's really holding up.
 

04sleeper

Founding Member
Jun 22, 2002
2,674
14
89
Dallas, TX
Oct 24, 2004
#10
  • Oct 24, 2004
  • #10
BlackFox5.0 said:
Looks like I'll be selling them then lol. Like I said they are on my other block, which I plan to build up a little.

Anyways, I figured I'd ask first, because I don't like my Macs, and I had these laying around.

What are good headers anyways? I never bought a pair before, my Macs were given to me, and of course the Flowtechs were on my notch's old motor. My friend has FMS P headers for his GT-40P's and I like how they look as far as quality goes, and the paint on his looks like it's really holding up.
Click to expand...
The FRPP shorties are very nice. I think it would be hard to find a better shortie. 1 peice flange, 409 stainless, Jet Hot "Sterling" finish, lifetime warranty.
 

Attachments

  • 397M9430P51.webp
    12.4 KB · Views: 225

Michael Yount

Mustang Master
Apr 10, 2002
9,039
6
79
Charlotte, NC
Oct 24, 2004
#11
  • Oct 24, 2004
  • #11
If his FRPP shorties for the p heads are coated I doubt it's paint. It's likely ceramic coating like Sleeper's above. And it's the ONLY coating that will hold up on a header long term. The FRPP quality is some of the best around. And the units are made of stainless steel - so ceramic coating is the only option - if you choose to coat them. I recommend it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Drivetrain 83’ Glx convertible C5 Trans help!
  • JacksonJared2113
  • Dec 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
401
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 26, 2025
JacksonJared2113
L
95 gt engine vibration
  • lenzgt
  • May 11, 2026
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
6
Views
222
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech May 26, 2026
lenzgt
L
B
Take a look at my rack!
  • bicknell
  • Sep 1, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
9
Views
695
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 13, 2025
Willybill32
B
Where to go from here on my build…
  • B0udreaux
  • Jul 14, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
217
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 18, 2026
AeroCoupe
L
2012 Seats in 98 GT Convertible - pictures coming
  • lparsons42
  • Aug 11, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
273
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Aug 17, 2025
lparsons42
L
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?