• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

FMS/McLeod scattershield and hydraulic clutch?

  • Thread starter Thread starter RaSMG
  • Start date Start date Feb 5, 2004

RaSMG

Founding Member
Oct 5, 2002
270
0
0
Central Cali
Feb 5, 2004
#1
  • Feb 5, 2004
  • #1
I'm putting a TKO on a 306, looking at a FMS scattershield (I can get a good price on) which I've heard is the same as the Mcleod. Can anyone confirm that they are the same and/or if the FMS has 'indexed runout' like the Mcleod unit does, ie no dowel indexing like the lakewood. The reason I'm skeptical is that I heard the Mcleod unit works with Tremec or T5 if you ever swap but the ford racing listing shows two different versions 'Tremec Scatter Shield M6392C' and 'T-5 Scatter Shield M6392A' so that threw me off. Anyone?

Next question might be more tricky. In searching I noticed that everyone runs the stock type cable clutch and in some instances an extended clutch fork is required for 'proper gemoetry' and release of the throwout bearing when using a scattershield bellhousing. I will be using a hydraulic master/slave cylinder linkage setup and was wondering if anyone has any experience hooking them up with a scattershield. It's basically a hydraulic master cylinder and pushrod connected to the clutch pedal, lines going to another 'slave' cylinder, and a remote fluid reservoir. The slave cylinder is mounted on the transmission for my application and the adjustable pushrod pushes the clutch fork end towards the engine releasing the throwout bearing similar to the cables. A company named JMC makes the kits for classic mustangs but I have all the correct part numbers and will be building the kit myself. I will be using the throwout bearing that comes with my SPEC stage 3 clutch if that matters. If you've never heard of the hydraulic linkage here's a few pictures that show how it works and installs.
http://www.autoworks.cc/65-70_clutch_kit_instructions.htm
Technically it's not a 'hydraulic clutch' as it uses a standard TO bearing, it's just a linkage system with hydraulic benefits. Anyone have any ideas on if I'll need the longer clutch fork with that setup?

Thanks for reading all that, I know it's long but I thought I'd give all the specs now rather than wait and have to answer ?'s later.
 

RaSMG

Founding Member
Oct 5, 2002
270
0
0
Central Cali
Feb 5, 2004
#2
  • Feb 5, 2004
  • #2
TTT
maybe i should've made the topic called 'x pipe vs h pipe'
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

U
Knowledge Sought
  • USMCE3ROFP
  • Dec 6, 2025
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
0
Views
208
Other Auto Tech Dec 6, 2025
USMCE3ROFP
U
K
TKX Transmission Shifting Problem
  • KWC156
  • Jun 23, 2025
  • Other Auto Tech
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
2K
Other Auto Tech Jun 13, 2026
427nostang
4
SN Mustang Magnum T56 swap
  • revhead347
  • May 24, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
15
Views
6K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jun 28, 2026
GearHeadGuy
For Sale 3-owner 1987 Mustang GT, $18K obro, Lancaster CA
  • Bill Cool
  • Oct 6, 2024
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
4
Views
2K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Oct 13, 2024
nickyb
Hydraulic slave cylinder for a T5
  • thejoe
  • Oct 6, 2020
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
5
Views
4K
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Oct 13, 2020
zookeeper
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?