• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Ford Racing B or C springs?

  • Thread starter Thread starter sirr0bin
  • Start date Start date Mar 30, 2006

sirr0bin

New Member
Jul 18, 2003
174
0
0
Winnipeg, Manitoba
Mar 30, 2006
#1
  • Mar 30, 2006
  • #1
Hey guys, was wondering if you would recommend B or C springs for my setup

parts list:
kyb gr2 shocks/struts
3.73's /w rebuilt trac loc
max motorsports lower control arms
granatelli upper control arms
max motorsports front strut bar
lincoln mark vii 73mm calipers
hawk hps brake pads
max motorsports braided steel brake lines
max motorsports full length subframe connectors

The main difference I see between the B and C springs is that the front spring rate is much higher in the C springs, 650lb/feet versus 425

I mainly auto-x my car, although it is also a daily driver. I was wondering if the C springs would be more beneficial over the B springs, however, I also live in Winnipeg, Manitoba, and our roads SUCK. Ride quality is unfortunately going to be a factor. Any suggestions?

http://www.fordracingparts.com/parts/part_details.asp?PartKeyField=271
 

sirr0bin

New Member
Jul 18, 2003
174
0
0
Winnipeg, Manitoba
Mar 31, 2006
#2
  • Mar 31, 2006
  • #2
well I ordered the C springs

whee!
 

Shakerhood

20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 28, 2004
3,356
208
114
Ohio
Mar 31, 2006
#3
  • Mar 31, 2006
  • #3
The Bullitts I have I think are 650 Progressives and they ride and handle really nice.
 
I

iwashmycar

20+ Year Stangneter
Apr 7, 2004
1,236
1
39
Columbus, Ohio
Mar 31, 2006
#4
  • Mar 31, 2006
  • #4
i got the b's with KYB shocks/struts and i like them alot, since they are progressive springs.
 

troyGT03

New Member
Feb 22, 2004
278
0
0
too close to memphis,tn
Mar 31, 2006
#5
  • Mar 31, 2006
  • #5
i have used both. the b spring did better on lowering and a better ride. imo
 

RARE5.0NOTCH

New Member
Oct 17, 2004
3
0
0
OHIO
Nov 3, 2006
#6
  • Nov 3, 2006
  • #6
I have the b springs on my notch and love them. Ride is the same to me.
 

TomCat

New Member
Apr 19, 2005
412
0
0
Utah
Nov 3, 2006
#7
  • Nov 3, 2006
  • #7
Cs on mine, but I haven't driven it much with em. Looks good, though
 
I

iwashmycar

20+ Year Stangneter
Apr 7, 2004
1,236
1
39
Columbus, Ohio
Nov 3, 2006
#8
  • Nov 3, 2006
  • #8
wow....thread's back from the dead i see
 

myslo50

Member
Jun 12, 2006
247
3
18
ohio
Nov 3, 2006
#9
  • Nov 3, 2006
  • #9
i just bought the B springs this week and i have to install them this winter. i went with the B spring because of the lower spring rate for ride quality
 

rd

Founding Member
Jan 12, 2000
3,316
63
109
Ocean Springs MS
Nov 3, 2006
#10
  • Nov 3, 2006
  • #10
I have had the B springs in my Capri since 91 or so, and really like them. They lowered the front about 1/2 in more than I wanted, but they ride nicely and have lasted this long no prob. I would not want the stiffer C springs, for either ride quality or weight transfer purposes. They give me all the handling I would ever want. I had stock tires when I got them, put skinnies on a bit later. I love the skinnies, and it still corners flat and feels nimble.
 
8

86bluecobra

Advanced Member
Dec 20, 2004
4,265
12
69
B.C. Canada
Nov 3, 2006
#11
  • Nov 3, 2006
  • #11
I have c's in my car and i ave to tell you body roll is non existant. Yes the ride quality is a little down i'm sure because of how stiff they are. And i also think these springs are hurting my drag racing but the car has a nice stance.
 

Fox_84

New Member
Dec 28, 2005
143
0
0
Nov 3, 2006
#12
  • Nov 3, 2006
  • #12
I have the C springs and i guarantee you a way stiffer ride than factory. So if you are definitely worried about a softer ride, go B. If you want a car the digs in to corners hard with absolutely no body roll and can sacrifice some ride quality, go C
 

Maryland Stang

Active Member
Aug 21, 2002
1,656
30
39
Greenville, NC
Nov 4, 2006
#13
  • Nov 4, 2006
  • #13
I have the Bs on my car and it is rough. The road in front of my house hasn't been paved in over 30 years and it beats me to death. Crossing rough railroad crossings can be quite the experience too. Be prepared to go a little sideways. Road race springs are generally made for smoother surfaces.
 

DW5.0L

Member
May 28, 2005
172
0
16
Florida
Nov 4, 2006
#14
  • Nov 4, 2006
  • #14
I like my B's a lot. Its hard for me to remember what the originals were like when it was new, but these springs seem to fit my needs now for sure. Lowered the car and makes it handle almost as if its on rails. To me there is nothing soft about the ride but its far from harsh either. The road quality down here is good though.
 

Flavadave4

Active Member
Nov 28, 2003
1,044
21
49
Utica, NY
Nov 4, 2006
#15
  • Nov 4, 2006
  • #15
lots of people run/love the B springs....let us know how the c's work for you!
 

JChalfan

Member
Nov 27, 2002
551
0
16
Bellevue, WA
Nov 4, 2006
#16
  • Nov 4, 2006
  • #16
rd said:
I have had the B springs in my Capri since 91 or so, and really like them. They lowered the front about 1/2 in more than I wanted, but they ride nicely and have lasted this long no prob. I would not want the stiffer C springs, for either ride quality or weight transfer purposes. They give me all the handling I would ever want. I had stock tires when I got them, put skinnies on a bit later. I love the skinnies, and it still corners flat and feels nimble.
Click to expand...

The B springs definitely lower the front more than they say, and a little more than I wanted. It's not horrible, but I wasn't looking for a raked look. My car handles pretty well with them, but I haven't really pushed it yet, since I have really crappy tires on it still.

I had some lowering springs on my last 5.0, I thought they were B springs (they came with the car), but they were a lot stiffer than the B's I just put on my car, so they were probably C's. The B's aren't too stiff.

Jeff
 

Jaswir

Member
Mar 31, 2005
578
0
18
Orlando, FL
Nov 5, 2006
#17
  • Nov 5, 2006
  • #17
i would go with B's... im gonna change my c springs way to stiff!
 

sirr0bin

New Member
Jul 18, 2003
174
0
0
Winnipeg, Manitoba
Nov 5, 2006
#18
  • Nov 5, 2006
  • #18
Ok so after driving with the C's all summer here's my review

The frontend is too low, and the backend is too high. It looks cool as hell, but man does the car dive while braking

Body roll is very much still there, next year I will be investing in some sway bars

Turnin is much improved, and the car is very composed through the corners

The gr2's sure didn't like the 650lb spring rate, they'll be replaced with bilsteins next year

All in all I'm still not regretting the purchase, but I think if I had just went for coilovers in the first place I would have been better off

Oh, and I didn't have any ride problems until the shocks blew again, even on bumpy as hell roads
 

BlooDReigN

Member
Feb 22, 2004
283
1
16
Calgary, Alberta
Nov 5, 2006
#19
  • Nov 5, 2006
  • #19
Anybody mind posting any of their experiences with their coil-overs and posting what kind of spring rates they are running? Have them in my car, but it's not runnin yet, so I'm curious to see what other people might say about similar set ups.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

A
SOLD For Sale: 1993 Ford Mustang Cobra Modified
  • anjteal93
  • Sep 5, 2025
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
13
Views
2K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Oct 26, 2025
Mindseye007
SN95 The Unicorn
  • HANO Motorsports
  • May 18, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 15, 2025
HANO Motorsports
SOLD SOLD!!!! 1993 Notchback Roadracer For Sale. She's a beast!
  • Boydster
  • Apr 25, 2025
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
0
Views
1K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Apr 25, 2025
Boydster
M
For Sale FS: 2000 Mustang GT Track Car / 62k Miles / 5k on Motor / Full Roll Cage / California / $5,000 OBO
  • McSmash
  • Jun 8, 2020
  • SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04)
Replies
0
Views
5K
SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04) Jun 8, 2020
McSmash
M
For Sale For Sale: Silver 2001 Mustang GT Premium Convertible $7,500 / 90,750 miles - lots of upgrades
  • normster6969
  • Nov 17, 2018
  • SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04)
Replies
3
Views
5K
SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04) Nov 17, 2018
normster6969
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?