• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Ford Racing C Springs?

  • Thread starter Thread starter harry1587
  • Start date Start date May 25, 2005
H

harry1587

New Member
Mar 31, 2005
35
0
0
May 25, 2005
#1
  • May 25, 2005
  • #1
Hey, I have a 2003 GT. I am wanting to get rid of the 4x4 look but I dont want to drop it real low. I am wondering if anyone has these springs. Also would I need stuts and shocks? or Caster Camber plates? I have a lot of tire wear on the outside of my front tires...would caster camber plates fix this or could I just get a simple alightmnet? THANKS
 
G

Gray03GTStang

New Member
May 25, 2005
14
0
0
May 25, 2005
#2
  • May 25, 2005
  • #2
My dad did the full Bullitt suspension which is "C" springs Tokico shocks and struts and swaybars it isnt extremely low and it rides better than the stock suspension on my 03. I just ordered some Ford Racing "B" springs and it said that you wont need new shocks, struts or c/c plates.

My dad got that suspension kit at www.stangsuspension.com for $417.
 
W

WOT

Founding Member
Nov 26, 2000
2,817
0
46
Regina, Canada
May 25, 2005
#3
  • May 25, 2005
  • #3
Do a search. There are literally hundreds of us that have them and like them a lot.

I replaced my S&S at the sametime but is not neccesary right away. You will eventually. No CC"s for me, tires have a slight camber but ni issues or tire wear.
 
S

sixstang

New Member
Jun 10, 2002
27
0
0
May 25, 2005
#4
  • May 25, 2005
  • #4
Check out my clicky for some pics, I didn't need caster and camber plates.
 

Nater

New Member
Sep 5, 2003
239
0
0
Maplewood, MN
May 26, 2005
#5
  • May 26, 2005
  • #5
If you want a drastic drop, don't go with the "C" springs. They drop the front and rear around and inch. I just spent 4 hours last night installing them myself. I like the look right now and am waiting for them to settle.
 

streetstang03

unModerator
Dec 27, 2003
0
1
0
the dark side of the moon/home of the 1999, 2003,
May 26, 2005
#6
  • May 26, 2005
  • #6
c springs are lower than b springs right?
 

CaliLifeStyle

New Member
Jun 9, 2004
625
0
0
Oxnard, CA
May 26, 2005
#7
  • May 26, 2005
  • #7
streetstang03 said:
c springs are lower than b springs right?
Click to expand...


I don't think so. C springs are static rate and B springs are progressive.
 

Slider

Founding Member
May 19, 2000
729
1
18
Gainesville, FL
May 26, 2005
#8
  • May 26, 2005
  • #8
I have been running C springs for 4 or so years now. I still have the stock shocks and no C/C plates. You will be fine with out them.

The C springs are definetly stiffer than stock. They are linear and about 600 lbs/in in the front. That is up for the stockers being around 450 in/lbs. They will definetly stiffen up your ride. However, the are not that stiff IMHO. If you have nice roads where you live you will probably not even notice that much, that is until you take your first corner Also, the rear springs sit too high, at least they used to. Most people cut one coil of the rears to even out the car. I did, and it really makes a big difference.

Progessive rate springs do not have the same spring rate throughout the entire travel of the spring. They have a softer spring rate at first, and then the spring rate increases as the are compressed. You can jsut imagine that they are two different springs stacked on top of each other, a softer one and a stiffer one. They cost more, but they give you a better ride on the street. The softer intial spring rate helps to smooth out the bumps, and the stiffer rate will help you during cornering and braking. The only down sides is that they cost more.
 

Attachments

  • side driver small.webp
    55.8 KB · Views: 984
  • front driver close small.webp
    60.4 KB · Views: 598

sunburst six

New Member
Aug 21, 2004
3
0
1
May 26, 2005
#9
  • May 26, 2005
  • #9
Nater said:
If you want a drastic drop, don't go with the "C" springs. They drop the front and rear around and inch. I just spent 4 hours last night installing them myself. I like the look right now and am waiting for them to settle.
Click to expand...

Actually, it's more like 1 1/2'"-1 3/4"........just let them settle and see.

I've had my Bullitt shocks/struts C-spring combo on for about 3 years now....no complaints whatsoever. Best $350 I ever spent.

Here's a recent pic. I just switched from 275/40 up front to 265/35 because it rubbed when fully turned, so there is slightly more gap than before.

 

CaliLifeStyle

New Member
Jun 9, 2004
625
0
0
Oxnard, CA
May 26, 2005
#10
  • May 26, 2005
  • #10
sunburst six said:

Click to expand...

Awesome Stang.
 

Evenflow

yellow snow cone lover
Nov 4, 2004
116
0
16
Mass
May 26, 2005
#11
  • May 26, 2005
  • #11
Looks good, but I think the C springs dont drop the car enough. But as far as the price goes for the C springs, you cannot really beat that.

Try some Steeda Sport Springs
 

04DarkShadowGT

Member
Jan 31, 2004
474
0
17
Fort Wayne, IN
May 26, 2005
#12
  • May 26, 2005
  • #12
I would do the C springs again, but I would install shocks/struts at the same time. My stockers are on the way out with about 20,000 miles since the spring install.

Here is a pic for reference.
 
W

WOT

Founding Member
Nov 26, 2000
2,817
0
46
Regina, Canada
May 26, 2005
#13
  • May 26, 2005
  • #13
Don't drop enough?

Mine have settled more then I thought. I installed mine 2 years ago and they dropped at least 1 3/4 to 2 inches in the front and 1 1/2 to 1 3/4 in the back. Much lower and I would be able to drive on city streets.
 

Nater

New Member
Sep 5, 2003
239
0
0
Maplewood, MN
May 27, 2005
#14
  • May 27, 2005
  • #14
sunburst six said:
Actually, it's more like 1 1/2'"-1 3/4"........just let them settle and see.

I've had my Bullitt shocks/struts C-spring combo on for about 3 years now....no complaints whatsoever. Best $350 I ever spent.

Here's a recent pic. I just switched from 275/40 up front to 265/35 because it rubbed when fully turned, so there is slightly more gap than before.
Click to expand...

I was just quoting from Mustangtuning.com where they advertise this: 'These Ford Racing Springs (C-Springs) will lower your car 1"-1.25". This will give your car an agressive stance and it will also give your car a lower center of gravity making your car handle better. Ford Racing Springs fit all Mustangs 79-04 (except 99+ cobra). Lowers car approximately 1"-1.25".'
And this is from gefracing.com: 'Ford Racing springs are an affordable and perfect choice for lowering your Mustang. Spring Rating: 650 lb./in. front - 200/300 lb./in. rear Lowers car 1.2 inches front, 1 inch rear Fits all 1979-2003 Mustangs.'
I'm not calling you a liar or flaming you, just relaying what I have been told rather than experience. Though I do notice that the front dropped quite a bit after they were installed. The rear not as much. I didn't measure before and after, just comparing based upon what I've seen.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Suspension Harsh Ride
  • PonyGTrider
  • Mar 20, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3 4
Replies
62
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 11, 2026
Noobz347
A
SOLD For Sale: 1993 Ford Mustang Cobra Modified
  • anjteal93
  • Sep 5, 2025
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
13
Views
2K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Oct 26, 2025
Mindseye007
B
'03 GT Fuel Pump/Pressure/Delivery Issue
  • Brodach
  • Oct 21, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
886
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 31, 2025
gkomo
S
Drivetrain 8.8 Pinion and 302 rear main seal leaks after replacing. 93 5.0 with t-5
  • Steigy4827
  • Jun 23, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
10
Views
659
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 1, 2026
Steigy4827
S
M
Progress Thread 1993 Ford Mustang 5.0 convertible stock manual - ODB Codes shows running lean
  • mcalvo
  • Feb 11, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 22, 2025
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?