• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Ford Racing Z2363 Crate Engine Build

  • Thread starter Thread starter Habu135
  • Start date Start date Dec 12, 2021
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • …
  • 12
Next
1 of 12 Next Last

Habu135

5 Year Member
Jan 10, 2019
1,222
773
133
California
Dec 12, 2021
#1
  • Dec 12, 2021
  • #1
I'm researching a replacement engine for my tired stock block and have settled on Ford Racing's "Z2363" crate engine. I suspect a solid 440 rwhp from this combo and will be adding my existing Trick Flow "Streetburner" (idle-5,500 rpm) intake. I will almost certainly have the intake extrude honed for some additional flow. Has anyone had dealings or heard anything about this crate engine? I like that it comes already assembled, has a warranty and that I can reuse the stock accessories and retain the stock height hood. The car will be street driven 95% of the time.

363 CUBIC INCH 507 HP BOSS CRATE ENGINE-Z2 HEADS-FRONT SUMP PAN

363 CUBIC INCH 507 HP BOSS CRATE ENGINE-Z2 HEADS-FRONT SUMP PAN|Ford Performance Parts
performanceparts.ford.com

 

TOOLOW91

If you're the village idiot what's that make me?
20+ Year Stangneter
Nov 29, 1999
8,483
8,687
234
S.I.NY
Dec 12, 2021
#2
  • Dec 12, 2021
  • #2
I think you’ll love the 363 . You’re not going to have any issue there .

As far as the intake I think even ported it’s a little small for that combo but it will do what you need it to. I’m a fan of a systemax2 or a trick flow r for that setup . The r over the systemax because the systemax lower has small 1250 ports until you open it up. The r would be a bolt and go
 
Reactions: revhead347, manicmechanic007, Hoytster and 1 other person

OldManRiver

Active Member
Feb 14, 2015
238
131
53
Central Wisconsin
Dec 12, 2021
#3
  • Dec 12, 2021
  • #3
It sure is nice but........for that money you could do a COMPLETE 'Yoty swap,but If that's not your thing at least compare some options from FordStrokers.
 

Habu135

5 Year Member
Jan 10, 2019
1,222
773
133
California
Dec 12, 2021
#4
  • Dec 12, 2021
  • #4
OldManRiver said:
It sure is nice but........for that money you could do a COMPLETE 'Yoty swap,but If that's not your thing at least compare some options from FordStrokers.
Click to expand...
That crate engine is approximately $10k. I don't believe I can do a complete Gen 2 or 3 Coyote swap for $10k.
 
Reactions: joncash

Habu135

5 Year Member
Jan 10, 2019
1,222
773
133
California
Dec 12, 2021
#5
  • Dec 12, 2021
  • #5
TOOLOW91 said:
I think you’ll love the 363 . You’re not going to have any issue there .

As far as the intake I think even ported it’s a little small for that combo but it will do what you need it to. I’m a fan of a systemax2 or a trick flow r for that setup . The r over the systemax because the systemax lower has small 1250 ports until you open it up. The r would be a bolt and go
Click to expand...
I agree. My concern is if I go with a Trick Flow Track Heat or Box R that it will be a dog under 3k rpm. And as it all be street driven I'll want good off idle driveability.
 

KRUISR

10 Year Member
Apr 16, 2015
1,809
909
143
Dec 12, 2021
#6
  • Dec 12, 2021
  • #6
507 HP at 6500 rpm is not what I would call street engine (unless you are doing high speed races on the interstate). Based on some of the specs I could find on the combination, and plugging them into a dyno sim program (I came up with 502hp @ 6500, 461 lb ft @5000) I would bet off idle power is not much higher than stock.



I understand it is a sim program and they are not know to be perfectly accurate, but it is likely in the ballpark.

Same program, stock 5.0 specs



Take it for what you want.
 

Bullitt347

I have been doing it wrong this whole time
15 Year Member
Mar 23, 2007
3,955
2,915
194
Middle of Maine
Dec 12, 2021
#7
  • Dec 12, 2021
  • #7
459HP at 8k rpm on the crate 363...
That program is skewed to say the least. The valve springs on those heads will not go 8K.
Off idle power is going to be a lot better with the 363. That is the beauty of a 3.4" stroke over the 3" stroke.
The printouts shown show 80 lb/ft more torque at 2K rpm for the 363, which is basically off idle.
 

KRUISR

10 Year Member
Apr 16, 2015
1,809
909
143
Dec 12, 2021
#8
  • Dec 12, 2021
  • #8
Bullitt347 said:
459HP at 8k rpm on the crate 363...
That program is skewed to say the least. The valve springs on those heads will not go 8K.
Click to expand...
Yes the program doesn't know what you actually rev the engine to. It is a calculation that assumes you can rev every engine to 12k. If you think about it, the actual engine becomes limited by the parts in it. The program assumes it can rev higher without those limits. Valve springs limited to 6500 or 7000 or 8000 rpm do not change what the engine can produce from 2000-5000. So ignore the numbers higher than you will likely use.

Remember it is a simulation and obviously has errors.

Hey here is another option, change the valve springs to some that can handle 8k and 459 is probably close to what you get.
 

Habu135

5 Year Member
Jan 10, 2019
1,222
773
133
California
Dec 12, 2021
#9
  • Dec 12, 2021
  • #9
I appreciate any information you guys want to throw at me as it tends to generate discussion topics in areas I wouldn't have considered. The intake is an area I'm still trying to decide on. I realize I'll need 1 7/8" headers, although I'm still researching a good brand. I'll be able to swap most of my accessories over. Will go with an Anderson power pipe, but still researching what size (80, 85, or 90mm) throttle body.
 

96pushrod

I think they're a little easier to get off
5 Year Member
May 15, 2018
1,530
871
133
Savannah
Dec 12, 2021
#10
  • Dec 12, 2021
  • #10
Habu135 said:
I agree. My concern is if I go with a Trick Flow Track Heat or Box R that it will be a dog under 3k rpm. And as it all be street driven I'll want good off idle driveability.
Click to expand...
The box r is definitely not a dog at low engine speeds, especially on a 363. I think you’d be surprised how good it is down low.
 
Reactions: revhead347 and Habu135

Habu135

5 Year Member
Jan 10, 2019
1,222
773
133
California
Dec 12, 2021
#11
  • Dec 12, 2021
  • #11
TOOLOW91 said:
I think you’ll love the 363 . You’re not going to have any issue there .

As far as the intake I think even ported it’s a little small for that combo but it will do what you need it to. I’m a fan of a systemax2 or a trick flow r for that setup . The r over the systemax because the systemax lower has small 1250 ports until you open it up. The r would be a bolt and goA
Click to expand...

96pushrod said:
The box r is definitely not a dog at low engine speeds, especially on a 363. I think you’d be surprised how good it is down low.
Click to expand...
Are you referring to the R -Series or the box style oval shaped R intake? I believe the larger intakes have a 90mm opening.

I'll also be going with a T-56. So no worries about blowing the trans and with a 2.97 first gear and 3.73 in the rear I'll be above 2,000 rpm very quickly.
 
Last edited: Dec 12, 2021

96pushrod

I think they're a little easier to get off
5 Year Member
May 15, 2018
1,530
871
133
Savannah
Dec 12, 2021
#12
  • Dec 12, 2021
  • #12
Habu135 said:
Are you referring to the R -Series or the box style oval shaped R intake? I believe the larger intakes have a 90mm opening.

I'll also be going with a T-56. So no worries about blowing the trans and with a 2.97 first gear and 3.73 in the rear I'll be above 2,000 rpm very quickly.
Click to expand...
The box r is probably out for you due to wanting to retain a stock hood. It’s a great intake, and I like running it, and my car sees street 99% of the time. I wouldn’t trade it for anything else mentioned.

The non-box r wouldn’t be my choice of intake if the box was out of the equation. I’d honestly rather have a ported Vic jr efi setup over the regular r intake, or a heavily worked systemax.

Off idle drivability will be good regardless, as long as it’s tuned properly. A 363 ci engine with the cam that engine comes will drive perfectly fine, especially with 3.73+ gears.

I’ve never understood people’s infatuation with really caring how much power something makes under 3000rpm anyways though. Like they’re going to stab the throttle at 2500rpm in 5th gear and expect to have a good time without downshifting.
 
Reactions: Boostedpimp, a91what and TOOLOW91

Habu135

5 Year Member
Jan 10, 2019
1,222
773
133
California
Dec 12, 2021
#13
  • Dec 12, 2021
  • #13
96pushrod said:
The box r is probably out for you due to wanting to retain a stock hood. It’s a great intake, and I like running it, and my car sees street 99% of the time. I wouldn’t trade it for anything else mentioned.

The non-box r wouldn’t be my choice of intake if the box was out of the equation. I’d honestly rather have a ported Vic jr efi setup over the regular r intake, or a heavily worked systemax.

Off idle drivability will be good regardless, as long as it’s tuned properly. A 363 ci engine with the cam that engine comes will drive perfectly fine, especially with 3.73+ gears.

I’ve never understood people’s infatuation with really caring how much power something makes under 3000rpm anyways though. Like they’re going to stab the throttle at 2500rpm in 5th gear and expect to have a good time without
Click to expand...
What about the Series R? Seems like a good compromise between the smaller Track Heat, the mid level Street Burner and high rpm running Box R style intake.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20211212-165329_Chrome.webp
    41.5 KB · Views: 190

TOOLOW91

If you're the village idiot what's that make me?
20+ Year Stangneter
Nov 29, 1999
8,483
8,687
234
S.I.NY
Dec 12, 2021
#14
  • Dec 12, 2021
  • #14
Habu135 said:
Are you referring to the R -Series or the box style oval shaped R intake? I believe the larger intakes have a 90mm opening.

I'll also be going with a T-56. So no worries about blowing the trans and with a 2.97 first gear and 3.73 in the rear I'll be above 2,000 rpm very quickly.
Click to expand...
R series. Not the box R

I have a 90 on my car and drive it everywhere and barely noticed a difference from the 70 mm in drivability. In fact it’s more responsive .

The track heat is a glorified street burner I wouldn’t waste money on it
 

Habu135

5 Year Member
Jan 10, 2019
1,222
773
133
California
Dec 12, 2021
#15
  • Dec 12, 2021
  • #15
Thanks. I'm beginning to develop a picture here of what parts I need to include a Denso 280-5103 starter. What sized throttle body would you recommend for this 363 + R-Series with the 90mm opening?

I believe the Ford Racing has tall valve covers. Will the R-Series clear the valve covers?
 

96pushrod

I think they're a little easier to get off
5 Year Member
May 15, 2018
1,530
871
133
Savannah
Dec 13, 2021
#16
  • Dec 13, 2021
  • #16
Habu135 said:
Thanks. I'm beginning to develop a picture here of what parts I need to include a Denso 280-5103 starter. What sized throttle body would you recommend for this 363 + R-Series with the 90mm opening?

I believe the Ford Racing has tall valve covers. Will the R-Series clear the valve covers?
Click to expand...
Accufab 90mm. It’ll probably be the last tb you’ll buy.

You might have issues with things like the fpr hitting the intake, and maybe the throttle bracket hitting the valve covers. These are kind of things you just have to deal with and overcome with this stuff.
 
Reactions: Habu135

ThinBlue502

5 Year Member
May 7, 2019
404
718
113
Ohio
Dec 14, 2021
#17
  • Dec 14, 2021
  • #17
Habu135 said:
That crate engine is approximately $10k. I don't believe I can do a complete Gen 2 or 3 Coyote swap for $10k.
Click to expand...
Prices have come down on the actual motors. In all honesty, my calculations for a swap with full accessories is around $13K. I ran some rough numbers a few weeks ago. Just food for thought.
 

Habu135

5 Year Member
Jan 10, 2019
1,222
773
133
California
Dec 14, 2021
#18
  • Dec 14, 2021
  • #18
I suspect you're about right. I just did a quick search myself.

The advantage of a Coyote Gen 3 over the Z2363 is what a higher revving motor and a little more room to grow into mod/hp wise? I'm thinking 450-460 RWH is good for the streets on normal street tires and anything above that will need drag radials or more drag focused suspension. I want to keep the car N/A and am leaning toward the Z2363 engine for uniqueness. I'll be backing it up with a T-56.
 

Habu135

5 Year Member
Jan 10, 2019
1,222
773
133
California
Dec 14, 2021
#19
  • Dec 14, 2021
  • #19
Who makes good 1 7/8" long tubes? The only place I can find that looks well built is Kooks and I'll have to do the research to see if they fit the Z2363's heads.

Kooks Headers | Kooks Headers & Exhaust

Purchase your high-performance headers, performance headers, and exhaust headers from Kooks today.
kooksheaders.com
 

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,297
1,641
214
Acworth, GA
Dec 14, 2021
#20
  • Dec 14, 2021
  • #20
Habu135 said:
I suspect you're about right. I just did a quick search myself.

The advantage of a Coyote Gen 3 over the Z2363 is what a higher revving motor and a little more room to grow into mod/hp wise? I'm thinking 450-460 RWH is good for the streets on normal street tires and anything above that will need drag radials or more drag focused suspension. I want to keep the car N/A and am leaning toward the Z2363 engine for uniqueness. I'll be backing it up with a T-56.
Click to expand...

I'm a huge fan of Coyote swap. The comparible cost completely over looks the value of your time though. A Coyote swap takes real time, where a crate motor is a drop in with a far lower time investment. Some people make cost suggestions without the understanding of how much free time different people have. Congrats on choosing a crate engine; I have lost many hours of my life coordinating with machine shops, and getting parts where they need to go. There is a lot to be said for swiping your card, and the complete engine shows up truck freight days later. I also have grown to like the Ford parts too. There are better heads out there, but nothing seems to fit and work as well as the parts that Ford makes.

I would consider swapping those valve covers for the Trick Flow valve covers. Unfortunately, Ford is still too focused on old hot rods with carbs, and doesn't offer a low profile valve cover. The Trick Flow ones are designed to work with a fuel injected engine, and will be without a doubt the best step towards getting more clearance for your stock hood. It was the best investment in clearance I ever made. You can also put a real filler neck on it.

I would also look at the BBK headers over the Kooks. I doubt there will be much performance difference between the 1 7/8" over the 1 3/4", and the BBKs fit so much better, and less than half the cost.

Kurt
 
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • …
  • 12
Next
1 of 12 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
802
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
302 Engine build questions
  • Vulpes5.0
  • Apr 19, 2022
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
5K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 10, 2022
LEEDAY Boss
B
For Sale Ford Racing Engine Harness
  • blakphi
  • Oct 11, 2022
  • Interior Exterior Parts
Replies
1
Views
825
Interior Exterior Parts Oct 11, 2022
blakphi
B
S
For Sale 1998 FORD Mustang GT, manual transmission, for parts or race chassis
  • SN95ForSale
  • Dec 10, 2021
  • SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04)
Replies
1
Views
2K
SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04) Dec 14, 2021
SN95ForSale
S
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?