szer0 said:I wish I had media credentials to get access to the high res. If anyone has credentials why don't you share those photos here
351CJ said:As far as the photos go, there is nothing new there other than photos of the pace car (with all the decals) and a photo of the "soft drink" test which appears Coke being poored on some transmission part. All the other photos go back 1 - 6 months and have bee posted here and on other Mustang sites.
Well, aren't you just The Man.351CJ said:Note that the HP rating for the V6 is 210 HP, just like I told everyone 2 months ago.
In addition, note that the official width is 73.9" as I tried to tell every one months ago.
maybe they have one aluminum head, and one isnt?szer0 said:Found a typo.
V-6 4.6L 60-degree V6; iron block and aluminum head
jadesville said:maybe they have one aluminum head, and one isnt?
351CJ said:Note that the HP rating for the V6 is 210 HP, just like I told everyone 2 months ago.
Also a Ford engineer e-mailed Brad (mustangsource) that the rating for V6 was very conservative that it really makes over 220 HP.
Isays that the V6 is 4.0L and the GT is 4.6L in the overview, but it says the V6 is a 4.6L in the specifications. Typoszer0 said:I was looking at the displacement. It's supposed to be 4.0L, not 4.6L isn't it?
Roots66 said:Well, aren't you just The Man.
With your expert forsight, you should play the lottery more often.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?