• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

fors are gay

  • Thread starter Thread starter 602rat
  • Start date Start date May 6, 2004
Status
Not open for further replies.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Next
1 of 4 Next Last
6

602rat

Banned
May 6, 2004
10
0
0
May 6, 2004
#1
  • May 6, 2004
  • #1
fords are gay

alright all oyu b i t c hes, you need to realize something. ford sux. its is the biggest peice of toolage ever seen, and the whole company needs to burn to the ground
 

90_Red_LX

Member
Sep 29, 2003
668
5
19
Asheboro, NC
May 6, 2004
#2
  • May 6, 2004
  • #2
Wow how stupid are you....ban this guy.
 
8

85GTlover

New Member
Mar 20, 2004
704
0
0
May 6, 2004
#3
  • May 6, 2004
  • #3
Oh boy yet another idiot troll...go run through red lights
or something don't waste our time. LOSER. :mad

 
6

602rat

Banned
May 6, 2004
10
0
0
May 6, 2004
#4
  • May 6, 2004
  • #4
nope, sorry, i had a ford, and then i saw the light. mopar baby
 
8

85GTlover

New Member
Mar 20, 2004
704
0
0
May 6, 2004
#5
  • May 6, 2004
  • #5
yeah old mopar....you have half a brain anyway, HemiCuda #1
 
6

602rat

Banned
May 6, 2004
10
0
0
May 6, 2004
#6
  • May 6, 2004
  • #6
oh yeah man
hemi dodge all the way
 

Starscream88

New Member
Mar 8, 2003
1,277
1
0
Park Ridge NJ
May 6, 2004
#7
  • May 6, 2004
  • #7
Ban him
 

Icepick

Founding Member
Jul 30, 2002
378
0
0
Ft Lauderdale
May 6, 2004
#8
  • May 6, 2004
  • #8
Some Mopars are ok, but no reason to come here bashing Fords lol
 
6

602rat

Banned
May 6, 2004
10
0
0
May 6, 2004
#9
  • May 6, 2004
  • #9
i used to have a ford ranger, with v 6 and auto. it was the biggest trash heap ive everseen. i junked it, and baut a same year(2000) dodge dakota, auto v 6, and i have loved it ever since




oh yeah, and ford ownwers b l o w c o c k
 
9

92GreenGT

PEAT
Founding Member
Jul 18, 2002
2,085
1
46
Big Stone Gap, VA
May 6, 2004
#10
  • May 6, 2004
  • #10
Icepick said:
Some Mopars are ok, but no reason to come here bashing Fords lol
Click to expand...
Mopars....haha

Poor guy, Let me guess you drive some mopar that runs what 10's or so. All you did was change the carb and intake I bet right?? I like old cars as much as anyone but damn some owners get on my nerves.

That thing gotta HEMI?

Dave
 
9

92GreenGT

PEAT
Founding Member
Jul 18, 2002
2,085
1
46
Big Stone Gap, VA
May 6, 2004
#11
  • May 6, 2004
  • #11
602rat said:
i used to have a ford ranger, with v 6 and auto. it was the biggest trash heap ive everseen. i junked it, and baut a same year(2000) dodge dakota, auto v 6, and i have loved it ever since




oh yeah, and ford ownwers b l o w c o c k
Click to expand...
Oh hell, you drive a dakota, there for a minute I thought you actually had something.

Dave
 
9

92GreenGT

PEAT
Founding Member
Jul 18, 2002
2,085
1
46
Big Stone Gap, VA
May 6, 2004
#12
  • May 6, 2004
  • #12
Damn, you cant spell worth a $hit either. Typical Dodge owner.

Thanks for the thread man, I get to see you get banned and I get some free post. At least you done something productive.

Dave
 
6

602rat

Banned
May 6, 2004
10
0
0
May 6, 2004
#13
  • May 6, 2004
  • #13
better than a car that looks like it was designed with an erector set. i also own a 69 charger, and i love it
 
9

92Frankenstein

New Member
Apr 25, 2004
223
0
0
Minnesota
May 6, 2004
#14
  • May 6, 2004
  • #14
Sometimes, you need to just smile and nod... Remember, the driver is 90% of how the vehicle performs, and his intelligence is at about a 7%.. all these out of a 100.. so you figure... 7% and you need 90%.. math sucks... MOPAR... IT JUST SOUNDS SLOW...

 
9

92GreenGT

PEAT
Founding Member
Jul 18, 2002
2,085
1
46
Big Stone Gap, VA
May 6, 2004
#15
  • May 6, 2004
  • #15
602rat said:
better than a car that looks like it was designed with an erector set. i also own a 69 charger, and i love it
Click to expand...
HAHA sure was man. I tell ya, with all those modern styling ques of the Charger. Shoot, I think I will just go down to the Dodge dealer and buy me a new one. Wait, that wont happen, I forgot they stopped making those for some reason. Dude, I like Chargers, but you just take the cake.

Dave
 

88stangmangt

Active Member
Nov 25, 2003
2,332
1
48
Stafford,VA
May 6, 2004
#16
  • May 6, 2004
  • #16
602rat said:
better than a car that looks like it was designed with an erector set. i also own a 69 charger, and i love it
Click to expand...
ok good for you but............ step one if your gonna bash ford make sure you atleast spell it right cool?????people already think you are a fool comeing in here since the first thing they see is fors what a nimrod.
 
6

602rat

Banned
May 6, 2004
10
0
0
May 6, 2004
#17
  • May 6, 2004
  • #17
the charger went out in style, unlike the mustang(need i bring up the 88 horse power 80's s h i t b o x) some things need to quit while there ahead
oh wait, i forgot, fords will never be ahead
and one last thing. just so you know, every top fuel dragster uses a DODGE HEMI ENGINE. beat that
 
9

92GreenGT

PEAT
Founding Member
Jul 18, 2002
2,085
1
46
Big Stone Gap, VA
May 6, 2004
#18
  • May 6, 2004
  • #18
Hey I think you need to stay around. I could use someone like you to talk to when I get on here. Make it more fun ya know, give you your own Custom Title, "Self-Owned".

Dave
 

Cammed90Notch

New Member
Mar 26, 2003
592
0
0
Greenville, SC
May 6, 2004
#19
  • May 6, 2004
  • #19
you're bragging about a 2000 Dodge Dakota? I used to have a 2001 w/ power options, extended cab (SLT), etc. Sure, it looks alright (especially the R/T) but the 3.9s STINK! Once you get about 3k rpm, it feels like the engine is going to fly apart. Not to mention the 318s in those Dakotas weren't the best either. They probably had a whopping 200hp tops

And traction, don't even think about traction in a dakota. No, it's certainly not because of power, but because of horrible weight distributation and bad suspension. I often got the poop scared out of me just driving down the road because if you hit a bump sometimes, the truck would start bouncing around on the road

So before you brag about some rat, or a Dodge Dacrapa, think again
 
9

92GreenGT

PEAT
Founding Member
Jul 18, 2002
2,085
1
46
Big Stone Gap, VA
May 6, 2004
#20
  • May 6, 2004
  • #20
602rat said:
the charger went out in style, unlike the mustang(need i bring up the 88 horse power 80's s h i t b o x) some things need to quit while there ahead
oh wait, i forgot, fords will never be ahead
and one last thing. just so you know, every top fuel dragster uses a DODGE HEMI ENGINE. beat that
Click to expand...
Ok, What about the Boss 429 engine, pretty sure it was a HEMI. What about that man, I am sure you know what HEMI means right? Becuase a lot of engines today use Hemispherical head design, it was pretty effecient.

Dave
 
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Next
1 of 4 Next Last
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

P
Fox Opinions Wanted- at a crossroad with my '88 GT
  • pindude80
  • Apr 18, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
32
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 22, 2025
pindude80
P
3
Eight inches is enough for me...
  • 351MooseStang
  • Nov 27, 2025
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
5
Views
554
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Mar 2, 2026
Bullitt347
1
Engine Motor swap from a 2003 Explorer
  • 1996mustang new
  • Oct 9, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
568
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 16, 2025
squeak93
0
V6 to V8 Swap info
  • 02_2v_Curtis
  • Jan 11, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
673
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jan 11, 2026
02_2v_Curtis
0
87-93 Mustang T-top/Sunroof production numbers
  • Mustang5L5
  • Jan 6, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 5, 2025
Mustang5L5
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?