• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

FOUR WHEEL DISC PROPORTIONING VALVE

  • Thread starter Thread starter JETHRO
  • Start date Start date Feb 7, 2006

JETHRO

Founding Member
Jul 27, 2002
410
0
16
ALTOONA PA
Feb 7, 2006
#1
  • Feb 7, 2006
  • #1
did a five lug swap last winter and did four whell disc with cobra brakes. i omitted the stock proportioning valve and replaced it with a wilwood deal for the back. i teed the front and the lines went straight to the wheels from the master cylinder. i used a 95 master cylinder. should i have kept the stock proportioning valve? the brakes dont feel like they should. i had better brakes with the stock master cylinder that pretty much only used the front brakes. im wondering if the 95 master cylinder is bad and im switching to an svo master cylinder.
 

jrichker

StangNet's favorite TOOL
In Remembrance. Thank you for your contributions
Mar 10, 2000
27,512
2,813
234
Dublin GA
Feb 7, 2006
#2
  • Feb 7, 2006
  • #2
See http://www.svo73mm.cjb.net/ for all the answers to your brake questions.
 

Shakerhood

20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 28, 2004
3,356
208
114
Ohio
Feb 8, 2006
#3
  • Feb 8, 2006
  • #3
Yes you should have kept the Original one and gutted the front part and put the FMS Brass Plug in and bought a 3-2 kit from Maximum Motorsports and used it with the adjustable one.
 

352Ford2

New Member
Oct 12, 2005
393
0
0
Seattle,WA
Feb 8, 2006
#4
  • Feb 8, 2006
  • #4
After I guted my fac porp valve, Insead of buying that 11 doller plug I took the stock one and welded up the hole. Not sure what type of alumium it is but it only really liked the laninated tugnstun elctrode with a fair amout of heat. The pure electrode didn't do so well.
 

JETHRO

Founding Member
Jul 27, 2002
410
0
16
ALTOONA PA
Feb 9, 2006
#5
  • Feb 9, 2006
  • #5
i dont understand what the diff would be if you just eliminated it. i have both front wheels teed off one port of the master cylinder. does the PV give you better pressure or more pressure? like i said i have the adjustable one for the rear. i figured thats all i would need.
 

old_blue

15 Year Member
Nov 3, 2003
1,783
282
124
Feb 9, 2006
#6
  • Feb 9, 2006
  • #6
JETHRO said:
does the PV give you better pressure or more pressure?
Click to expand...
it gives the correct pressure to the wheels. You put the adj for the rear b/c you don't want them to lock up before the front.

Since there really is no worry for rear drums locking up before front discs there isn't a need to control the pressure as much in stock form . But since you changed to rear discs you need to be able to control how they work. The stock distribution block (gutted) is still able to balance the pressure to the fronts.
 

JETHRO

Founding Member
Jul 27, 2002
410
0
16
ALTOONA PA
Feb 9, 2006
#7
  • Feb 9, 2006
  • #7
i believe the pressure is balanced but my problem is it seems like i dont have enough vacuum. i dont have any issues where one front wheel locks up before the other in the rain. the pedal is very firm and hard to push. brand new booster with vacuum.
 
R

rowdie- stang

New Member
Apr 20, 2003
172
0
0
augusta ga
Feb 9, 2006
#8
  • Feb 9, 2006
  • #8
I did the ford cobra brake upgrade and the only thing that I can see is you should be using a 93 cobra booster. You can still use a stock master cylinder
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,215
17,899
224
Massachusetts
Feb 9, 2006
#9
  • Feb 9, 2006
  • #9
I am confused on how you have this setup.

You have the front port on the MC T-ed off and running to each of the front brakes and the rear port running to the rear brakes with the prop valve in line with that?

I am not sure that each port sees equal pressure. That could be your problem right there. The way it's usually done is that the two ports from the MC run down to the gutted stock prop valve. SInce it's gutted, any inbalance in pressure is equalized inside the prop valve. From there, you run 3 lines out. 1 to each front brake and 1 to the rear brakes through an aftermarket prop valve.

Now that's how it's usually done, but if each port off the MC displaces equal pressure then they way you have it plumbed should work, althogh i can't confirm. Now if the pressures from each port isn't equal, then you would have a problem
 

old_blue

15 Year Member
Nov 3, 2003
1,783
282
124
Feb 9, 2006
#10
  • Feb 9, 2006
  • #10
I also think that the distro block compensates for the unequal brake line lengths. But I could be wrong.
 

JETHRO

Founding Member
Jul 27, 2002
410
0
16
ALTOONA PA
Feb 10, 2006
#11
  • Feb 10, 2006
  • #11
i have the aftermarket PV going to the rear. im getting a cobra MC tomorrow. i mat try to exchange the new booster for a cobra one. if that doesnt work then ill see if i can find the stock PV and gut it.
MUSTANG 5L5- the way i believe it should be is the front port goes to the back and the rear port goes to the front. i sure hope so anyway. thats what the diagram said.
 

Shakerhood

20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 28, 2004
3,356
208
114
Ohio
Feb 10, 2006
#12
  • Feb 10, 2006
  • #12
Mustang5L5 said:
I am confused on how you have this setup.

You have the front port on the MC T-ed off and running to each of the front brakes and the rear port running to the rear brakes with the prop valve in line with that?

I am not sure that each port sees equal pressure. That could be your problem right there. The way it's usually done is that the two ports from the MC run down to the gutted stock prop valve. SInce it's gutted, any inbalance in pressure is equalized inside the prop valve. From there, you run 3 lines out. 1 to each front brake and 1 to the rear brakes through an aftermarket prop valve.

Now that's how it's usually done, but if each port off the MC displaces equal pressure then they way you have it plumbed should work, althogh i can't confirm. Now if the pressures from each port isn't equal, then you would have a problem
Click to expand...

It is actually a Shuttle Valve and there are guts in the front side and rear side if I remember correct, only the front side gets gutting leaving the rest intact, not a good idea to remove it completely.
 

JETHRO

Founding Member
Jul 27, 2002
410
0
16
ALTOONA PA
Feb 10, 2006
#13
  • Feb 10, 2006
  • #13
i just tried out the 93 cobra master cylinder and it definitely feels better.
 
C

cornholio47

Founding Member
Oct 17, 2002
90
0
0
winston salem, nc
Oct 15, 2007
#14
  • Oct 15, 2007
  • #14
Ok, i have a question of my own then. The guy that owned my car before me put bigger piston calipers on the car and left the stock master cylinder. to solve this problem I am going to install a SVO master cylinder. Can i still use the stock proportioning valve or will i have to change that. I would think that the bigger bore on the master cyl would not determine the need for a different proportiong valve. the rear brakes are still stock drum brakes by the way.
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,215
17,899
224
Massachusetts
Oct 15, 2007
#15
  • Oct 15, 2007
  • #15
Yes you still need an adjustable prop valve. Anytime you put different brake setups on a car other than stock, you need different proportioning.

The stock fox brake line setup is terrible anyway. Which calipers do you have up front? Are they the 73mm calipers? If so, the SVO MC is only ideal if you have the SVo rear disk setup as well. With stock drums, it would not be ideal. You actually want a '93 cobra MC.

The stock fox brake setup is plumbed with the front driver's wheel seeing 100% pressure from the MC while the passenger wheel and rear are reduced through the prop valve. That means you have 3 different pressures going to different wheels.

With the Cobra MC and 3-2 conversion, you now send equal pressures to both front wheels and have the ability to dial in your rear pressure depending on factors such as tires and weight. If you have a heavy GT vert or HUGE sticky rear tires, you can dial in more rear bias.

It just makes the braking system "better"
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

B
68 manual disc/drum master cylinder
  • Butchd88
  • May 27, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
44
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- May 27, 2026
Butchd88
B
Brakes FOX BRAKES ISSUES
  • PonyGTrider
  • Jan 11, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
53
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 31, 2026
Mustang5L5
8
87 lx 4cyl to v8 project 4 lug disc conversion questions
  • 87lx428
  • Mar 24, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
477
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 25, 2026
87lx428
8
1970 brake issue. Bad booster or?
  • All Stock93
  • May 13, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
692
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Sep 13, 2025
All Stock93
3
Brakes Front brakes sticking - 1988 5.0
  • 302Blue
  • Oct 18, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
468
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 19, 2024
ustacould
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?