• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

fox length axles or sn95? And what else for 10in rim?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 90_Red_LX
  • Start date Start date Feb 4, 2013
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last

90_Red_LX

Member
Sep 29, 2003
668
5
19
38
Asheboro, NC
Feb 5, 2013
#21
  • Feb 5, 2013
  • #21
Also rear brakes sn95 or newer rear discs. Front brakes are off an 01 bullitt ala 99/01 cobras
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,264
17,952
224
Massachusetts
Feb 5, 2013
#22
  • Feb 5, 2013
  • #22
screamin5oh said:
no the housings are the same, axle length and bolt hole size changed
Click to expand...

Housings are not the same. Trust me on this.


Sent from my iPhone 4S using Tapatalk
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,264
17,952
224
Massachusetts
Feb 5, 2013
#23
  • Feb 5, 2013
  • #23
90_Red_LX said:
Also rear brakes sn95 or newer rear discs. Front brakes are off an 01 bullitt ala 99/01 cobras
Click to expand...

SN95 refers to all 94-04 mustangs. That's the chassis, so you gotta be careful when using this term to describe a specific year.

All rear brakes are the same. Gt and v6 brakes from 1994 are the same as gt/v6 brakes from a 2004. Cobra brakes from 94-98 will also work.

Both use the same 38mm caliper, so it's a personal choice if you want a 10.5" solid rotor, or a 11.65" vented rotor.

Keep in mind of you use fox axles, you'll need special axle brackets from north race cars.

This thread has tons of good info for the questions which will prob come next

http://www.stangnet.com/mustang-for...5-lug-brake-conversion-upgrade-thread.801400/


Sent from my iPhone 4S using Tapatalk
 

90_Red_LX

Member
Sep 29, 2003
668
5
19
38
Asheboro, NC
Feb 5, 2013
#24
  • Feb 5, 2013
  • #24
I understand. Yea the standard gt/v6 brakes is what I was aiming towards.

Was actually going to call nrc here in the next few days, and get brackets, axles, and cables. May just do their whole rear package and save the headache of hunting stuff down.

So it appears fox axles are the reccommended length in my case. Spacers won't be an issue, I'll order or whip some up myself.
 

ratio411

Founding Member
Apr 21, 2002
3,870
73
109
Pensacola FL
Feb 5, 2013
#25
  • Feb 5, 2013
  • #25
Mustang5L5 said:
Keep in mind of you use fox axles, you'll need special axle brackets from north race cars.
Click to expand...

He could also look up the instructions for the "bracket flip" and escape the expense of new brackets.
 
Reactions: 88LX5.Oh

flyinhigh90

Member
Nov 23, 2012
107
1
19
40
San Bernardino
Feb 6, 2013
#26
  • Feb 6, 2013
  • #26
ya but the advantage of getting a diff off a 96 and up is the gear ratio right they come 327 stock? compared to the 273 's..... on the fox and the 94-95.....
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,264
17,952
224
Massachusetts
Feb 6, 2013
#27
  • Feb 6, 2013
  • #27
flyinhigh90 said:
ya but the advantage of getting a diff off a 96 and up is the gear ratio right they come 327 stock? compared to the 273 's..... on the fox and the 94-95.....
Click to expand...

That would be 99+

But, then you run into the issue of the housing on the 99-04 axle being physically wider than the 86-98 housing
 

88LX5.Oh

15 Year Member
Dec 30, 2011
1,442
205
94
Arkansas
Feb 6, 2013
#28
  • Feb 6, 2013
  • #28
I'm pretty sure '96-98 all had 3.27's. My rear I got for my car was out of a '96 'Vert and it had 3.27's in it
 

ratio411

Founding Member
Apr 21, 2002
3,870
73
109
Pensacola FL
Feb 6, 2013
#29
  • Feb 6, 2013
  • #29
flyinhigh90 said:
ya but the advantage of getting a diff off a 96 and up is the gear ratio right they come 327 stock? compared to the 273 's..... on the fox and the 94-95.....
Click to expand...
Yeah, 2.73 was put into many 86-95 Mustangs, but many got 3.27s. They are certainly NOT rare or even hard to find.
Doesn't matter, 3.27 is not a gear to pine over anyway. Get the right rear end, then get the right gear installed, instead of compromising for a gear ratio that is a compromise in itself.

Forgot to mention all the other Fox rears that are relatively easy to find that have 3.55 and 3.73 gears if you are dead set on using an old rear with it's stock gear set.
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,264
17,952
224
Massachusetts
Feb 6, 2013
#30
  • Feb 6, 2013
  • #30
88LX5.Oh said:
I'm pretty sure '96-98 all had 3.27's. My rear I got for my car was out of a '96 'Vert and it had 3.27's in it
Click to expand...


3.27s were available. But not the only gear. 2.73s and 3.08s were still available in certain option packages.

http://www.stangnet.com/mustang-forums/threads/gears-on-stock-4-6-2v-98gt-auto-2-73.464980/

99+ is when ford went 3.27 across the board
 
Reactions: ratio411

madspeed

Colonel Mustard
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
8,914
1,332
204
a van down by the river
Feb 6, 2013
#31
  • Feb 6, 2013
  • #31
3.27 is one of the most popular amongst the turbo crowd!
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,264
17,952
224
Massachusetts
Feb 6, 2013
#32
  • Feb 6, 2013
  • #32
I plan on ditching my 3.73s for 3.27s


Sent from my iPhone 4S using Tapatalk
 

ratio411

Founding Member
Apr 21, 2002
3,870
73
109
Pensacola FL
Feb 7, 2013
#33
  • Feb 7, 2013
  • #33
I guess I should market the 3.27 rear from my 87 I am about to take out...
I am doing mods on this car on the cheap, and I am putting in an entire 3.55 rear from a T-bird.
 

88LX5.Oh

15 Year Member
Dec 30, 2011
1,442
205
94
Arkansas
Feb 7, 2013
#34
  • Feb 7, 2013
  • #34
Mustang5L5 said:
3.27s were available. But not the only gear. 2.73s and 3.08s were still available in certain option packages.

http://www.stangnet.com/mustang-forums/threads/gears-on-stock-4-6-2v-98gt-auto-2-73.464980/

99+ is when ford went 3.27 across the board
Click to expand...
Good to know. I learn something new everyday
 

flyinhigh90

Member
Nov 23, 2012
107
1
19
40
San Bernardino
Feb 8, 2013
#35
  • Feb 8, 2013
  • #35
Ok So for now I'm just going with sn95 axles ... Does anyone know what ur car to take the drums from ? I don't remember if it's a ranger of what ? Thanks
 

ratio411

Founding Member
Apr 21, 2002
3,870
73
109
Pensacola FL
Feb 8, 2013
#36
  • Feb 8, 2013
  • #36
If you go with SN axles, you will have to use the SN discs for sure.
The rear space for the brakes is different between discs and drums.
That is why you have to modify the discs to use them on Fox length axles, which are rear spaced for drum brakes.
As far as I know, you can modify the discs to work with the drum axles, but not drums to work with disc axles.
 

1200gt

Active Member
Nov 29, 1999
357
40
39
Feb 8, 2013
#37
  • Feb 8, 2013
  • #37
2000xp8 said:
IMO, always use fox axles, you can add spacers if necessary, if you use sn95 axles only way to take them in is different wheels.
Click to expand...

This suggestion makes a lot of sense. I have been planning my rearend decissions around the exact wheels that I want to run, right now. But in thinking, I may get tired of those wheels and if I have closed some doors with axle choices then I may regret the move. Now, the questions is: What's the downside if any on using spacers - in my case my car will see only street duty...

Thanks for the advice.

Dwayne
 

1200gt

Active Member
Nov 29, 1999
357
40
39
Feb 8, 2013
#38
  • Feb 8, 2013
  • #38
If you get to the point of rolling the fenders, there is some really good how-to stuff out there concerning using a wooden baseball bat and rolling the car back and forth with the bat resting on the tire and the underside of the quater fender panel. There's more details to it, like having a heavy buddy put weight on the backhalf to apply compression.

Also, advice is to NOT get too agressive with the sledge hammer under the inner wells. Personally, I don't like the idea of NOT running my quad shocks but I hear you can't avoid removing them if you run 10" rims (period).

Dwayne
 

flyinhigh90

Member
Nov 23, 2012
107
1
19
40
San Bernardino
Feb 9, 2013
#39
  • Feb 9, 2013
  • #39
Does anyone know the length of the stock axles for the 87-93 fox body ?
 

David Pepiton

Active Member
Dec 17, 2011
662
68
49
38
Laveen, Arizona
Feb 9, 2013
#40
  • Feb 9, 2013
  • #40
28 1/4 or 29 1/4. idk why im guessing i have the axles sitting in my garage.

29 1/4 is the answer
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Rear Disc and Rims Offsets
  • TripleYellow
  • Nov 11, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
19
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 9, 2026
TripleYellow
C
Help identifying 8.8
  • Caden_H
  • Jun 25, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
677
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Nov 12, 2025
limp
R
What's it Worth? 1997 Cobra, a ton of mods and restoration
  • riored97snake
  • Jun 18, 2026
  • What is it Worth?!?!?
Replies
2
Views
197
What is it Worth?!?!? Jun 21, 2026
riored97snake
R
0
V6 to V8 Swap info
  • 02_2v_Curtis
  • Jan 11, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
765
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jan 11, 2026
02_2v_Curtis
0
Wheels-Tires LS mii swap and rear rim size/axle questions....
  • 78mIIman
  • Feb 2, 2025
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
6
Views
739
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech May 6, 2025
78 Mach1
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?