• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Fox Or 99-04?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ry94stang50
  • Start date Start date May 28, 2014
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Next
1 of 4 Next Last

ry94stang50

Member
Jun 21, 2013
427
12
19
Brick, NJ
May 28, 2014
#1
  • May 28, 2014
  • #1
Ok right now I have a 94 5.0 gt. I kinda want to sell it and get something a little nicer. I like my 94 but at this point I think its not the best choice to build up.
So I'm thinking my budget is around 6grand. I know the 99-04 4.6 is much faster but with my budget I'm thinking the one I would be able to afford would need a ton of work of being that its newer I would think parts are more expensive and the engine is harder to work on compared to the fox 5.0. Now looking the fox body $6 grand can potentially get me a really nice fox. With prob a rebuilt engine with some type of list of upgrades lol. Now I don't care about paint as long as the engine is really nice and has anice set of wheels and brakes and suspension is in hood shape I will bea happy camper.
Now what's your guys opinion. Wat are the pros of the foxbodys compared to a 99-04. And do you guys think I can find what I'm looking for in a fox with my budget?
 

ry94stang50

Member
Jun 21, 2013
427
12
19
Brick, NJ
May 28, 2014
#2
  • May 28, 2014
  • #2
Also if I were looking for a fox body I would def want supercharged or atleast ready for it. Like all forged. Turbo would be awesome but I'm thinking tuebo would be over my budget.
 

90lxwhite

I'm kind of a She-Man
5 Year Member
Aug 25, 2011
3,310
374
134
Between the Red and Rio
May 29, 2014
#3
  • May 29, 2014
  • #3
ry94stang50 said:
Now I don't care about paint as long as the engine is really nice and has anice set of wheels and brakes and suspension is in hood shape I will bea happy camper.
Click to expand...
Hood shape.
 
Reactions: NTO_GUY, 95BlueStallion, FoxMustangLvr and 3 others

90lxwhite

I'm kind of a She-Man
5 Year Member
Aug 25, 2011
3,310
374
134
Between the Red and Rio
May 29, 2014
#4
  • May 29, 2014
  • #4
Daily driving a fox kinda sucks. Think about this my man; if suspension is on that long list of extras more than likely they leaned towards the racier side. You don't wanna be running around town in that. It'd be like riding in a chuckwagon. Might be cheaper to keep er Ry guy
 

tannerc91gt

This last 25% is foreign territory at this point
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
4,392
2,967
234
Indiana
May 29, 2014
#5
  • May 29, 2014
  • #5
Why can't you build a 94 again?
 
Reactions: tamadrummer88

tamadrummer88

Active Member
Aug 19, 2005
599
79
39
Aloha State
May 29, 2014
#6
  • May 29, 2014
  • #6
In all honesty, id prefer a 94-04 chassis to build up than a fox chassis.
 

stykthyn

I want to measure mine. It doesn't look that tall.
15 Year Member
Jul 6, 2006
5,232
2,652
223
gainesville
May 29, 2014
#7
  • May 29, 2014
  • #7
I thought you got some cash coming to you and were buying a new car?
 

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,039
1,625
194
NJ
May 29, 2014
#8
  • May 29, 2014
  • #8
ry94stang50 said:
Ok right now I have a 94 5.0 gt. I kinda want to sell it and get something a little nicer. I like my 94 but at this point I think its not the best choice to build up.
So I'm thinking my budget is around 6grand. I know the 99-04 4.6 is much faster but with my budget I'm thinking the one I would be able to afford would need a ton of work of being that its newer I would think parts are more expensive and the engine is harder to work on compared to the fox 5.0. Now looking the fox body $6 grand can potentially get me a really nice fox. With prob a rebuilt engine with some type of list of upgrades lol. Now I don't care about paint as long as the engine is really nice and has anice set of wheels and brakes and suspension is in hood shape I will bea happy camper.
Now what's your guys opinion. Wat are the pros of the foxbodys compared to a 99-04. And do you guys think I can find what I'm looking for in a fox with my budget?
Click to expand...

Cross the fox off your list. While i love mine, in most cases it's going to be a worse car than a 94 for daily driving. More fun? Probably, but for 6 grand you aren't getting a built up quality daily driver.

As for new edge cars being "much" faster, ya if you are comparing it to a minivan and even then in stock form it's not a slam dunk.

The new edge is much better for daily driving, but far more expensive to modify.
 
Reactions: stykthyn

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,271
17,959
224
Massachusetts
May 29, 2014
#9
  • May 29, 2014
  • #9
Having owned both....


go 99+
 
Reactions: tamadrummer88

hoopty5.0

mechanicus terribilis
15 Year Member
Dec 14, 2010
7,790
6,940
214
SW Houston
May 29, 2014
#10
  • May 29, 2014
  • #10
Mustang5L5 said:
Having owned both....


go 99+
Click to expand...
This. I had one with an S-trim and exhaust. 420 whp safely, but got greedy and retuned it up to 460 whp. Both were very fun.
 
Reactions: tamadrummer88

90lxwhite

I'm kind of a She-Man
5 Year Member
Aug 25, 2011
3,310
374
134
Between the Red and Rio
May 29, 2014
#11
  • May 29, 2014
  • #11
Words to live by. Unless you're wealthy you either make payments or you make repairs. There are going to be issues when daily driving any 10+ yr old vehicle. Just the facts of life.
 
Reactions: NTO_GUY

VibrantRedGT

"STANGNET'S PENGUIN SMACKER"
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
14,679
424
154
Boca Raton, Florida
May 29, 2014
#12
  • May 29, 2014
  • #12
My 2006 GT was a great daily driver but it was fully loaded.

Don't think I could do a FOX DD in current day. Twenty two years ago it's all we had.
 

dnbonds

Active Member
Dec 17, 2013
363
66
39
Hampton, VA
May 29, 2014
#13
  • May 29, 2014
  • #13
I love my DD Fox even though it drains every paycheck. Of course this thread is not about DDing. I think fox's turn more eyes and have more status than a SN95 or a New Edge. You see them everyday.
 

Bullitt347

I have been doing it wrong this whole time
15 Year Member
Mar 23, 2007
3,987
2,968
194
Middle of Maine
May 29, 2014
#14
  • May 29, 2014
  • #14
ry94stang50 said:
I would think parts are more expensive and the engine is harder to work on compared to the fox 5.0.
Click to expand...
It is not that the 4.6 is harder to work on, it is that you are not used to working on one. I changed both cams on my 08' Bullitt without pulling the timing cover or intake manifold. Just pulled the V/C's and moved the air box and battery out of the way, and with the right tools replaced both cams is less than 3 hrs. I did not even have to buy a single gasket. I did not have to drain an ounce of coolant. Now tell me that you can change a cam faster than that on a push-rod 5.0. The 4.6 may be a bit more costly for parts right now, but (hell the 4.6 has been out for 18 years now) parts are getting cheaper.
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,271
17,959
224
Massachusetts
May 29, 2014
#15
  • May 29, 2014
  • #15
Bullitt347 said:
It is not that the 4.6 is harder to work on, it is that you are not used to working on one. I changed both cams on my 08' Bullitt without pulling the timing cover or intake manifold. Just pulled the V/C's and moved the air box and battery out of the way, and with the right tools replaced both cams is less than 3 hrs. I did not even have to buy a single gasket. I did not have to drain an ounce of coolant. Now tell me that you can change a cam faster than that on a push-rod 5.0. The 4.6 may be a bit more costly for parts right now, but (hell the 4.6 has been out for 18 years now) parts are getting cheaper.
Click to expand...

Agreed. The 4.6L is easy to work on...it's just different than a 5.0. Once you pop the hood and do a few simple repairs or yank a valve cover, you'll see it's nothing really too complex.

In terms of the rest of the car...it's pretty much just a reskinned fox. Even the engine bay still has the two snorkel locations into the fender that the old 79-85 Mustangs used for the carb intake hoses...still present up to 2004.

Technology wise, you get ABS (option) traction control (option) longer wheel base so the rear wheels are less prone to becoming the front wheels, better interior, better stereo system, better highway gas mileage, better brakes, better wheel options.

If you want HP, throw a throttle body, plenum and exhaust on the GT and now you'll be close to 300HP at the crank. A tune would be the icing on the cake.

If i had $6K in my pocket and it came down to a clean 1992 Fox GT or a clean 2001 GT....i'd go SN95 all the way. You just get more bang for your buck.

I'd even suggest a 96-98 Cobra if you can find a decent one.
 

FoxMustangLvr

I love my Pimp
SN Certified Technician
Oct 14, 2012
4,968
3,514
204
Spokane, Wa
May 29, 2014
#16
  • May 29, 2014
  • #16
ry94stang50 said:
Now looking the fox body $6 grand can potentially get me a really nice fox. With prob a rebuilt engine with some type of list of upgrades lol. Now I don't care about paint as long as the engine is really nice and has anice set of wheels and brakes and suspension is in hood shape I will bea happy camper.
Click to expand...

A rebuilt engine and some suspension parts (depending on how it's done) costs LESS than a good paint job and having to go through the interior and replace a bunch of chit.

Whether it's a Fox or SN95, shop for a Mustang that has a good foundation, receipts, good paint and interior with a strong running motor & trans. Who cares how "built" it is so long as it built well and reliable. Making it faster can come with time a few bucks at a time. Can't do that with paint & body work.
 

90lxwhite

I'm kind of a She-Man
5 Year Member
Aug 25, 2011
3,310
374
134
Between the Red and Rio
May 29, 2014
#17
  • May 29, 2014
  • #17
dnbonds said:
I love my DD Fox even though it drains every paycheck. Of course this thread is not about DDing.
Click to expand...
Ah but it is
 

FoxMustangLvr

I love my Pimp
SN Certified Technician
Oct 14, 2012
4,968
3,514
204
Spokane, Wa
May 29, 2014
#18
  • May 29, 2014
  • #18
90lxwhite said:
Hood shape.
Click to expand...

Is that a pic of StatusKill in his Cabriolet? This must have been before he got his Tommy Bahama pretentious hat. Love it!
 
Reactions: Bullitt347

dnbonds

Active Member
Dec 17, 2013
363
66
39
Hampton, VA
May 29, 2014
#19
  • May 29, 2014
  • #19
90lxwhite said:
Ah but it is
Click to expand...

Didn't see him say it was for a DD. Maybe I misunderstood thought his purpose was to build it up on a budget
 

90lxwhite

I'm kind of a She-Man
5 Year Member
Aug 25, 2011
3,310
374
134
Between the Red and Rio
May 29, 2014
#20
  • May 29, 2014
  • #20
dnbonds said:
Didn't see him say it was for a DD. Maybe I misunderstood thought his purpose was to build it up on a budget
Click to expand...
I think he's wanting to sell his 94 which I think is his DD to try and buy a "new" ride.
 
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Next
1 of 4 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

7
What megasquirt kit to order
  • 74delta
  • Jul 4, 2026
  • Digital Self-tuning Forum
Replies
11
Views
309
Digital Self-tuning Forum Jul 16, 2026
fasterthangas
F
Fox Good shop in Washington state or Oregon
  • keel
  • May 14, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
129
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 20, 2026
keel
K
Fox body swapped sn95
  • Konstang
  • Apr 30, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
609
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2025
95BlueStallion
Cobra Brake Conversion - Spare Wheel/Tire Search
  • AeroCoupe
  • Aug 2, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
161
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 14, 2026
AeroCoupe
Lost my Foxbody
  • Mhalc1
  • Feb 10, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
19
Views
777
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 17, 2026
Mhalc1
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?