• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Fuel Injector upgrade..yes or no?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Venom351R
  • Start date Start date Apr 13, 2008
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

Black95GTS

Active Member
Jan 8, 2004
1,644
3
38
Marlborough, MA
Apr 15, 2008
#21
  • Apr 15, 2008
  • #21
ShortThrow50 said:
24's would be fine with that setup. people always go overkill. but if if your gettin 30's for cheap go ahead and grab em. if you dont grab them, let me know where i can get them cause i have a s -trim on and i think its time for me to upgrade from my 24 pounders
Click to expand...

With HCI and sig, plus an S-trim, you could easily be putting down 450 rwhp. 30 pound injectors are no way in hell going to support that. If you define overkill as working within the manufacturer's spec, and not putting undue stress on critical components, then I will be overkill every time. Your fuel pump could be larger as well.

Adam
 

Venom351R

Founding Member
Apr 27, 2002
4,548
41
98
MAINE
Apr 15, 2008
#22
  • Apr 15, 2008
  • #22
Black95GTS said:
With HCI and sig, plus an S-trim, you could easily be putting down 450 rwhp. 30 pound injectors are no way in hell going to support that. If you define overkill as working within the manufacturer's spec, and not putting undue stress on critical components, then I will be overkill every time. Your fuel pump could be larger as well.

Adam
Click to expand...

Other then my injectors the rest of my fuel system is all set. There is a 255LPH in tank pump out back from the previous set up on the car before I bought it when it had a Vortech S-Trim.

I agree w/ the #30's being to small. My Fuel Pressure was cranked up close to 50 and it was still running lean up top on the dyno when I had my 95 GT w/ the Paxton Novi 2000. A H/C/I set up with a superchargers requires #42 injectors, any lower and your taking a chance on some not so good things happening.

Also have to remember that boost requires much more fuel load then if your just N/A.
 

ShortThrow50

Member
Oct 22, 2006
923
2
16
Pa
Apr 15, 2008
#23
  • Apr 15, 2008
  • #23
Black95GTS said:
With HCI and sig, plus an S-trim, you could easily be putting down 450 rwhp. 30 pound injectors are no way in hell going to support that. If you define overkill as working within the manufacturer's spec, and not putting undue stress on critical components, then I will be overkill every time. Your fuel pump could be larger as well.

Adam
Click to expand...

no doubt buddy. im actually gonna pick up a 255lph this week and am gonna upgrade the injectors soo as i free up some more cash. i do agree my injectors are too small for my application
 

Venom351R

Founding Member
Apr 27, 2002
4,548
41
98
MAINE
Apr 23, 2008
#24
  • Apr 23, 2008
  • #24
Thanks to every one's input and those who helped me out on this thread. I came to the conclusion that I would be better off to go with larger injectors and that #30's may not be enough and #42's to much w/ out boost so I went on a search for some #36's. I found this set on Ebay with a buy it now of $250 and shipping of $9.00. I send him an e-mail and got them for $239 shipped. I think I got a pretty good deal.


View attachment 320532
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Apr 23, 2008
#25
  • Apr 23, 2008
  • #25
If your gonna upgrade, I would do a 42lb injector. I have 30's in my 347 now and they're just about at 100% duty cycle. I let off when I saw 94% and I wasn't at my shift point yet. 30's might be ok for you as my combo is more aggressive and will make more power but i'd consider a good injector and be done with it.
 

Vipersix

Founding Member
Feb 25, 2001
434
0
0
Clarksville, TN
Apr 23, 2008
#26
  • Apr 23, 2008
  • #26
Grn92LX said:
I let off when I saw 94% and I wasn't at my shift point yet.
Click to expand...

Might I inquire where you "saw 94%"?
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Apr 23, 2008
#27
  • Apr 23, 2008
  • #27
My Anderson PMS.
 

Vipersix

Founding Member
Feb 25, 2001
434
0
0
Clarksville, TN
Apr 23, 2008
#28
  • Apr 23, 2008
  • #28
Cool, didn't know it tracked things of that nature.
 

Venom351R

Founding Member
Apr 27, 2002
4,548
41
98
MAINE
Apr 23, 2008
#29
  • Apr 23, 2008
  • #29
I just didnt want to much injector. Im not planning on boosting it at this point in time so running the #36 I should be fine at 39 PSI for the fuel pressure.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

M
Engine Unexplainable Exhaust Pop and Gurgle
  • Mrnissen122
  • Feb 14, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
12
Views
574
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 18, 2026
Noobz347
3
Eight inches is enough for me...
  • 351MooseStang
  • Nov 27, 2025
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
5
Views
580
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Mar 2, 2026
Bullitt347
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
SN Mustang Magnum T56 swap
  • revhead347
  • May 24, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
15
Views
6K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jun 28, 2026
GearHeadGuy
P
4 Hole Bosch Injectors max HP and Tune -4.6 PI
  • Png1978
  • Jul 23, 2022
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
1
Views
3K
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Aug 10, 2022
Chipss36
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?