• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Fuel Rail?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 89oem
  • Start date Start date May 25, 2014

89oem

Mustang Master
Dec 18, 2013
1,456
542
144
May 25, 2014
#1
  • May 25, 2014
  • #1
so madspeed scared me.... i have a stock fuel rail that came with my cobra intake... i had been wondering about the cross tubing now im thinking no way....since ill have bigger fuel pump and pressure...

what fuel rail does everyone run / recommend? strong street hci build...
 

madspeed

Colonel Mustard
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
8,914
1,332
204
a van down by the river
May 25, 2014
#2
  • May 25, 2014
  • #2
Bigger pump only keeps the flow adequate to support your engines needs. More pressure? Do explain....
 

89oem

Mustang Master
Dec 18, 2013
1,456
542
144
May 25, 2014
#3
  • May 25, 2014
  • #3
i figure a larger pump 340... will run more fuel through the lines, more volume = more pressure im also going bigger lmaf and matching 42 injectors... tune will balance it all but my understanding is the fp may be greater than stock... reason for going big = future SC...

am i wrong on the volume = pressure?
 

madspeed

Colonel Mustard
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
8,914
1,332
204
a van down by the river
May 25, 2014
#4
  • May 25, 2014
  • #4
yes you are incorrect, the pressure will remain the same as it is now
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
May 25, 2014
#5
  • May 25, 2014
  • #5
Unless it's a high pressure pump, it will not increase pressure at the rail....and even still, the regulator is going to dumb it down to 40psi.

Not sure why you would consider a 340lph pump. A HP255lph pump will more more fuel through the stock rails than they're able to handle anyway (about 500hp N/A). The 340lph pump is reserved for people with large fuel rails and the need to support 500+hp. Kind of a waste of money for everyone else. You'll never max out a HP255lph pump with stock rails and a stock block.
 

mikestang63

SN Certified Technician
Aug 27, 2012
11,606
8,859
214
In the garage
May 25, 2014
#6
  • May 25, 2014
  • #6
The stock fuel rails will easily support 450hp. The FPR and EEC keep the fuel pressure regulated. I believe the issue with Mad was the stupid schrader mounted fuel pressure gauge that no one should ever consider.
 

89oem

Mustang Master
Dec 18, 2013
1,456
542
144
May 25, 2014
#7
  • May 25, 2014
  • #7
thanks! im off base then....so the rails and cross over never see more pressure than regulator/ecu allows and that is beyond what id approach anyway... ?

i was thinking since it was on the return side ?? it caused more backup pressure than being on feed side allowing more flow through volume.... dam vs tap..... is that right?


considering it was a closed loop system, i assumed increased volume that much larger pump would deliver through the same fixed space would increase pressure in the whole system and that the regulator just controlled volume/pressure as required by the injectors via the ecu...and that was where the actual point of reference occurred for regulation...the orifice of the injector telling the ecu what it wanted for said volume via the table...

what i now understand is that unless the rails suc k and are faulty there is no issue..... ill go with what i have then...

im actually getting a really good deal on a new aeromotive 320...

* sorry mad, i thought you had said something about your sn95 rail crossover...
 

madspeed

Colonel Mustard
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
8,914
1,332
204
a van down by the river
May 25, 2014
#8
  • May 25, 2014
  • #8
mikestang63 said:
The stock fuel rails will easily support 450hp. The FPR and EEC keep the fuel pressure regulated. I believe the issue with Mad was the stupid schrader mounted fuel pressure gauge that no one should ever consider.
Click to expand...



judging from the carnage, I believe it actually was the fuel crossover line split. The worst of my burning was done right at the distributor. I still will not run a rail mounted gauge any longer for safety sake
 

89oem

Mustang Master
Dec 18, 2013
1,456
542
144
May 26, 2014
#9
  • May 26, 2014
  • #9
for a hundred or two dollars in parts, think ill go with piece of mind.....

so aeromotive, bbk, trickflow, edelbrock, others? whose rail is best option?

im thinking using braded fuel lines from/to the source / return lines - maybe russell?

i dont like the rubber tubing bbk uses but it is the least expensive... the accell and mallory have the return coming from the middle of the rail??

thanks for the help!
 

Spaz

Member
Jan 5, 2013
80
11
19
Pennsylvania
May 26, 2014
#10
  • May 26, 2014
  • #10
I have the Russell braided lines and Professional Products fuel rails and fuel pressure guage. Very happy with the Russell lines. The rails not so much. It took a few modifications to get them to fit right, and a couple of tries to get them to stop leaking. Mainly there was zero customer service. I tried contacting PPI a couple of times with questions and never got a response. Everything works fine now though. I just was on my own figuring it out.
 

RacEoHolic330

I like to dress like a pretty girl
15 Year Member
Mar 4, 2003
4,014
1,698
203
Allentown, PA
May 26, 2014
#11
  • May 26, 2014
  • #11
I prefer Glenn's or Behind Bars Race Cars fuel rails personally. Don't get a rail that has the return in the middle of one of the rails. That's a poor design, IMO.
 

89oem

Mustang Master
Dec 18, 2013
1,456
542
144
May 26, 2014
#12
  • May 26, 2014
  • #12
RacEoHolic330 said:
I prefer Glenn's or Behind Bars Race Cars fuel rails personally. Don't get a rail that has the return in the middle of one of the rails. That's a poor design, IMO.
Click to expand...

Thanks Scott, ill look those up... thanks for confirming the accell/mallory is just off somehow....


Spaz said:
I have the Russell braided lines and Professional Products fuel rails and fuel pressure guage. Very happy with the Russell lines. The rails not so much. It took a few modifications to get them to fit right, and a couple of tries to get them to stop leaking. Mainly there was zero customer service. I tried contacting PPI a couple of times with questions and never got a response. Everything works fine now though. I just was on my own figuring it out.
Click to expand...

Thanks Spaz! so no to PPI products, but Russell is a good plan if braided not part of 'kit'

********
others???
 
Last edited: May 26, 2014

89oem

Mustang Master
Dec 18, 2013
1,456
542
144
May 26, 2014
#13
  • May 26, 2014
  • #13
nice sites @RacEoHolic330 ! not cheap but really nice, are you running their braded nylon supply lines or did you run stainless or stock?

got a feeling my budget just expanded....
 

RacEoHolic330

I like to dress like a pretty girl
15 Year Member
Mar 4, 2003
4,014
1,698
203
Allentown, PA
May 26, 2014
#14
  • May 26, 2014
  • #14
I run TechAFX PTFE (teflon) braided stainless lines with Fragola fittings. I didn't want to deal with the potential of braided rubber lines leaching fuel vapors after a few years. Fuel systems are expensive man. I wouldn't replace your stock lines until your power levels demand it. Once you start replacing lines, you're no longer in the couple hundred dollar range.
 

89oem

Mustang Master
Dec 18, 2013
1,456
542
144
May 26, 2014
#15
  • May 26, 2014
  • #15
cool, just planning for the inevitable darn that looks bad scenario....

'while we're at' - norm abrams
 

89oem

Mustang Master
Dec 18, 2013
1,456
542
144
May 26, 2014
#16
  • May 26, 2014
  • #16
this techAFX ?

BlackWrap Braided SS PTFE Hose (conductive core)

-6, -8, -10 what size?

gotta assume its the fittings that run up the cost...

this may address my increased volume via aeromotive 320, better rails, adjustable fp gauge (for tune...)
all overkill but a long term do it once strategy....
 

madspeed

Colonel Mustard
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
8,914
1,332
204
a van down by the river
May 26, 2014
#17
  • May 26, 2014
  • #17
You mean adjustable fuel pressure regulator
 

89oem

Mustang Master
Dec 18, 2013
1,456
542
144
May 26, 2014
#18
  • May 26, 2014
  • #18
you are correct regulator...
 

RacEoHolic330

I like to dress like a pretty girl
15 Year Member
Mar 4, 2003
4,014
1,698
203
Allentown, PA
May 26, 2014
#19
  • May 26, 2014
  • #19
I ran a -10 feed and -8 return, but I have a 1000hp capable setup. With your 42lb injectors, your stock lines will flow more fuel fuel than your injectors will need. It will probably cost you a grand to build a PTFE fuel system. The fittings cost a pretty penny.
 

89oem

Mustang Master
Dec 18, 2013
1,456
542
144
May 27, 2014
#20
  • May 27, 2014
  • #20
thank you, i was guessing around 600... so no need unless lines are shot....ok
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

D
Fuel Erratic Fuel Pressure 1985 GT
  • DienstXIV
  • Jan 14, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
16
Views
622
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 16, 2026
AeroCoupe
N
89 LX 5.0 Fuel Rail Recommendations
  • Ncarter
  • Oct 17, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
6
Views
383
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 18, 2025
rednotch
J
Engine Running like crap :(
  • justadude07
  • Sep 27, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
309
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 19, 2025
DadLife0724
D
Fuel 1985 GT Fuel Line Diagram
  • DienstXIV
  • Apr 17, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 12, 2025
DienstXIV
D
G
Crazy fuel issue lifting fuel rails
  • greenhornponyguy
  • Oct 30, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
6
Views
309
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- May 18, 2026
bmmckl
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?