• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

getting my 351C rebuilt got some ?s

  • Thread starter Thread starter porkchop
  • Start date Start date May 24, 2004
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
P

porkchop

Founding Member
Aug 17, 2002
101
0
0
Waxhaw North Carolina
May 24, 2004
#1
  • May 24, 2004
  • #1
I am getting my 351C with 4v heads rebuilt. I am going to get it bored .30 over and i am getting forged pistons. Im going to have about 10.5 compression ratio. 1st question is do you think that my reconditioned connecting rods will hold up good. Also i am not sure about what cam to choose. i was looking at some cams from comp cams. Can you tell me what i could expect from the following cams. 280H, 286H, 282S, and 294S. any help would be appreciated. Thanks
 

SadbutTrue

Founding Member
May 1, 2002
2,390
4
49
Granada Hills, California
May 24, 2004
#2
  • May 24, 2004
  • #2
your reconditioned rods should be fine if you aren't going to be using forced induction, 10.5 is a very reasonable ratio. If the car is a street car, I don't think I'd go toward the 294 or anything near that high. The 280H gets good reviews and is a good all around cam. Depends on whether you want a strip screamer or a street car.
 

ratio411

Founding Member
Apr 21, 2002
3,870
73
109
Pensacola FL
May 24, 2004
#3
  • May 24, 2004
  • #3
Get ARP bolts in those rods. Fords are notorious for weak bolts.

I have to disagree with SbT on the cams.
Hydraulic cams run much rougher than solid. The 280H will actually have rougher idle and less torque than the 294S. Not that I recommend the solid, it does have the drawback of requiring more frequent tuning than the hyd. cam.
In order to recommend a cam, we really need more info on your car.
Things like:
Weight
Usage
Tranny
Converter
Gears
Intake
Exhaust
Etc...
 

Hack

15 Year Member
Mar 23, 2004
1,945
13
69
Minneapolis
May 24, 2004
#4
  • May 24, 2004
  • #4
Do you have the closed chamber 4V heads or the open chamber ones?
 
C

Cantedvalve

Founding Member
Aug 15, 2002
47
0
0
May 24, 2004
#5
  • May 24, 2004
  • #5
porkchop said:
I am getting my 351C with 4v heads rebuilt. I am going to get it bored .30 over and i am getting forged pistons. Im going to have about 10.5 compression ratio. 1st question is do you think that my reconditioned connecting rods will hold up good. Also i am not sure about what cam to choose. i was looking at some cams from comp cams. Can you tell me what i could expect from the following cams. 280H, 286H, 282S, and 294S. any help would be appreciated. Thanks
Click to expand...

Reconditioned rods will be fine. Get some quality bolts, and ALWAYS RESIZE WHEN REPLACING BOLTS. Get the beams polished and shot-peened if you so desire, it will strengthen them even more.

I know you didnt ask about any other cams, but I wanna throw my vote in for the Lunati Bracket Master II 00093. I have this cam. It is a BEAST of a cam, yet idles very nice. I run my idle 900 RPM out of gear and about 750 in gear. Even with a BAD carb tune, it has enough torque to get into 3rd gear SMOKING before the car moves. It is a little more $$, but DANG... worth it in my book. It is a hydro cam.

Other than that I would go with the 286H for a street car and the 294S if you plan to race the car on a regular basis.
 

LMan

Founding Member
Aug 10, 2002
1,246
0
0
Mom's basement
May 24, 2004
#6
  • May 24, 2004
  • #6
ratio411 said:
Hydraulic cams run much rougher than solid.
Click to expand...

Ive never heard this before.... a hyd flat-tappet running 'rougher' than a solid-lifter cam.. Can you elaborate?
 
P

porkchop

Founding Member
Aug 17, 2002
101
0
0
Waxhaw North Carolina
May 24, 2004
#7
  • May 24, 2004
  • #7
thanks for the info so far. The car is a 1971 Mach1 and it weighs how ever much it weighed out of the factory. Im going to be driving the car a decent amount but i want the car to get up and go when i want it to and when i take it to the strip. The tranny is a c6 with a B&M 2400 rpm stall converter. Gears and intake are stock right now but they will come very soon after the rebuild. I am wanting 3.50 gears and im not sure on what intake i am going to get. The exhaust is the manifolds hooked up to dual exhaust with no crossovers and they have glasspacks. I will also upgrade the exhaust after the rebuild. I will get a set of headers, 2.5in. x pipe and i am undecided on the mufflers. And yes i was planning on getting new rod bolts. Thanks for the info so far.
 
P

porkchop

Founding Member
Aug 17, 2002
101
0
0
Waxhaw North Carolina
May 24, 2004
#8
  • May 24, 2004
  • #8
ok i think i am down to two cams the 280H and the 286H how much of a difference is there between those two cams?
 

sooners2win

Member
May 23, 2004
40
0
6
Muskogee, OK
May 24, 2004
#9
  • May 24, 2004
  • #9
Porkchop, I would also reccomend roller rockers during your rebuild. something like this.....http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/e...&rd=1&item=2467274354&sspagename=STRK:MEWA:IT and.............http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/e...&rd=1&item=2467265157&sspagename=STRK:MEWA:IT have fun and enjoy the rebuild!
 
N

nosaj122081

New Member
Mar 5, 2003
202
0
0
West Virginia
May 24, 2004
#10
  • May 24, 2004
  • #10
I don't see a 286H listed... Do you maybe mean the 284H Extreme Energy?

Assuming thats the cam you're talking about, between the 284 and the 280, I'd go with the 284. The 4V heads are restrictive enough on the exhaust side but coupled with your temporary usage of manifolds, they're really gonna be restrictive. BUT, if it were me I'd want more converter for that cam personally, but it might be enough to work. You're DEFINITELY gonna want to get gears, probably should have tackled them first, because with the factory gears its gonna be a major slug getting off the line with a cam of any decent size, and the factory intake will run out of steam before that cam. The 284H is a bigger cam in general with the 280 Magnum grind, depending on your driving style you might want to consider the next cam smaller than the 284 in the Extreme Energy lineup. In the 351C I'm building, I'm going with the either the 284S by Comp or the F246 by Crane, more or less the same, proven, solid flat tappet cam, but I'll be running 3.89s and a 4 speed.
 
P

porkchop

Founding Member
Aug 17, 2002
101
0
0
Waxhaw North Carolina
May 24, 2004
#11
  • May 24, 2004
  • #11
also would say the 280H have any effect with my power brakes and power steering?
 
F

Fomocohipo

New Member
Feb 3, 2004
128
0
0
May 25, 2004
#12
  • May 25, 2004
  • #12
sooners2win said:
Porkchop, I would also reccomend roller rockers during your rebuild. something like this.....http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/e...&rd=1&item=2467274354&sspagename=STRK:MEWA:IT and.............http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/e...&rd=1&item=2467265157&sspagename=STRK:MEWA:IT have fun and enjoy the rebuild!
Click to expand...
I just installed those two today on my cleveland, awesome stuff!
 

sooners2win

Member
May 23, 2004
40
0
6
Muskogee, OK
May 25, 2004
#13
  • May 25, 2004
  • #13
Fomocohipo said:
I just installed those two today on my cleveland, awesome stuff!
Click to expand...
 

ratio411

Founding Member
Apr 21, 2002
3,870
73
109
Pensacola FL
May 25, 2004
#14
  • May 25, 2004
  • #14
LMan said:
Ive never heard this before.... a hyd flat-tappet running 'rougher' than a solid-lifter cam.. Can you elaborate?
Click to expand...
Performance hydraulic cam compared to a performance solid of the same specs, both flat tappet:
The hydraulic will idle rougher, have less vacuum, less throttle response, less torque throughout the range, a narrower power band, and far less tuning needed than a solid lifter cam.
For a solid cam to act the same as a hydraulic in respect to idle, vacuum, low end torque, etc... it would need 20* more duration at .050".
The big drawback to solid cams is that they require more attention to detail and maintenance than the hyd version. That is why hydraulic cams were developed.

Porkchop:
All the hydraulic cams mentioned so far will diminish vacuum needed to run power accessories.
I like the idea put forth about using the Comp Extreme Energy that is one step below the XE284.
They are a very aggressive lobe design and dual pattern.
The C can use a dual pattern cam, and one step lower would give you back vacuum. Also, considering the weight of your car and stall converter, I think you are looking at too large cams. If you do go with one of these 280-somethings, you should probably look at more stall and more gear.
270H or 274XE got my vote. XE more than the other.
Then you can keep your street manners, stall, 3.50 gears, etc...
Dave
 
F

Fomocohipo

New Member
Feb 3, 2004
128
0
0
May 25, 2004
#15
  • May 25, 2004
  • #15
Sooner,
Those were reccomended to me by my machine shop, they are a pretty hardcore performance shop too.
 
P

porkchop

Founding Member
Aug 17, 2002
101
0
0
Waxhaw North Carolina
May 25, 2004
#16
  • May 25, 2004
  • #16
with the 274xe will that mess with my vacuum or not?
 

ashford

Member
Dec 19, 2003
485
0
16
fargo ND
May 26, 2004
#17
  • May 26, 2004
  • #17
definitaly get quality rod bolts the oe ford ones tend to crack at the head of the bolt
 
F

Fomocohipo

New Member
Feb 3, 2004
128
0
0
May 26, 2004
#18
  • May 26, 2004
  • #18
Jesus christ! good thing ive got ARP all around my engine, how much power was that bad boy puting out??
 
P

porkchop

Founding Member
Aug 17, 2002
101
0
0
Waxhaw North Carolina
May 26, 2004
#19
  • May 26, 2004
  • #19
wow. so will the 274xe mess with my vacuum?
 
N

nosaj122081

New Member
Mar 5, 2003
202
0
0
West Virginia
May 27, 2004
#20
  • May 27, 2004
  • #20
porkchop said:
wow. so will the 274xe mess with my vacuum?
Click to expand...

Maybe just a hair, I ran a Bracket Master II, which is a little smaller, in a C and my brakes were somewhat spongy with it. You could always just get a vacuum can for peace of mind, they're not too much.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Engine Suggestions on an engine rebuild. Stock cam/GT40Ps or aftermarket on both for a fun weekend driver?
  • MadSquirrelTech
  • Apr 28, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
704
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 7, 2026
MadSquirrelTech
R
What's it Worth? 1997 Cobra, a ton of mods and restoration
  • riored97snake
  • Jun 18, 2026
  • What is it Worth?!?!?
Replies
2
Views
114
What is it Worth?!?!? Jun 21, 2026
riored97snake
R
R
Progress Thread 351w stroker rotating assembly and build
  • Ric4eyedFox
  • Mar 23, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
853
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 24, 2025
Noobz347
5
Hello Everyone !
  • 5150K
  • Friday at 5:34 PM
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
0
Views
48
The Welcome Wagon Friday at 5:34 PM
5150K
5
S
Fox '87 GT can't get to stay running
  • spilly
  • Mar 29, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
27
Views
684
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
spilly
S
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?