jstreet0204
Active Member
[Twitch] said:Just came back from the track with my friend and brought back some numbers from data logging with Diablo. My car is a 2001 Mustang GT and his is a 2004 Mustang GT Convertible with K&N FIPK. We both datalogged 2 runs at the track. Tonight temperature was 59 F.
2001 Mustang GT with Ghetto CAI
ECT Average = 185.5987147 F
ECT MAX = 196 F
ECT MIN = 168 F
IAT Average = 77.95115681F
IAT MAX = 88 F
IAT MIN = 64 F
MAF Average = 1662.522879 g/s
MAF MAX = 25434 g/s
MAF MIN = 485 g/s
2004 Mustang GT convertible with K&N FIPK
ECT Average = 202.2326192 F
ECT MAX = 212 F
ECT MIN = 194 F
IAT Average = 89.42107564 F
IAT MAX = 128 F
IAT MIN = 66 F
MAF Average = 2133.267599 g/s
MAF MAX = 21843 g/s
MAF MIN = 404 g/s
It's too late, I'm sleepy and I can't think straight. I'll comment on the result another time.
A few things to note on your results. While you average IAT is 11 degrees cooler on the fenderwell set the car with the FIPK's average ECT is about 16 degree warmer. I would think the higher underhood temps caused by that are also resulting in higher IAT's. Another thing to note on the MAF counts. While the FIPK unit apears to be flowing more, there is no guarantee that your MAF is dialed in. Elbows directly infront of the MAF tend to cause turbulence throwing off the MAF reading. Also the type of filter is not as important as the size of the filter. The FIPK comes with a much larger filter than what you could fit through the hole in the fender well, and thus has more area to flow through.