• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Go Over My Motor Parts List Please

  • Thread starter Thread starter fivespeedsteed
  • Start date Start date Apr 15, 2014
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last

fivespeedsteed

20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 17, 2003
748
22
69
Richmond, VA
May 11, 2014
#21
  • May 11, 2014
  • #21
while im returning things should i ditch the tfs valve springs and go with alex's? i have heard some complaints of the seal quality, ect?
 
Last edited: May 11, 2014

mikestang63

SN Certified Technician
Aug 27, 2012
11,606
8,859
214
In the garage
May 11, 2014
#22
  • May 11, 2014
  • #22
no. I like the TFS upgrade springs better than Alex's springs. if you are going to get better springs, get the LSX ones from FTI- Not cheap though
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
May 12, 2014
#23
  • May 12, 2014
  • #23
Chuckman said:
id stick with 1.6's, and ditch the pedestal-to-stud conversion if you can (or if you have no plans to upgrade heads again anytime soon). crane made the '93 cobra roller rockers if you can swing them, still a good bang for the buck and i believe they still make them.
Click to expand...
Unless the heads call for them, there's really no need to convert to stud mounted rockers unless you plan on really revving the engine. The pedestal mounted units are just fin below 6,500RPM IMO. I run the Ford Racing pedestal mounted rockers on my 331 and they're just peachy.
 

fivespeedsteed

20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 17, 2003
748
22
69
Richmond, VA
May 12, 2014
#24
  • May 12, 2014
  • #24
my train of thought was you could get the pushrod length much closer with the stud mounted ones.

so the ms93334 gasket kit is for a mustang? i have a ford racing gasket kit that seems to be mostly fel pro, do i just need the explorer upper to lower gasket then?
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
May 12, 2014
#25
  • May 12, 2014
  • #25
IMO, if you're going to go with the Ford Racing/Felpro "print-o-seal" intake gaskets (the ones between the intake and heads, not between the upper and lower) then stick with their "steel core" units. The standard gaskets are just laminated paper and get all out of shape in a very short time, causing coolant leaks. The steel core versions will hold their shape. I've got the 1262S-3 gaskets in mine.

Hands down, the best gasket I've ever used are Victor Reinz nitro seal.....but they're getting near impossible to find?!?
 
Last edited: May 12, 2014

madspeed

Colonel Mustard
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
8,914
1,332
204
a van down by the river
May 12, 2014
#26
  • May 12, 2014
  • #26
1262 here without issues
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
May 12, 2014
#27
  • May 12, 2014
  • #27
madspeed said:
1262 here without issues
Click to expand...
...yeah, but they've only been in there for about 15-minutes. lol

Wait till you've had them in a while and they start looking like this....







 

fivespeedsteed

20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 17, 2003
748
22
69
Richmond, VA
May 12, 2014
#28
  • May 12, 2014
  • #28
anyone have the part number for the steel core lower to upper ?
 

fivespeedsteed

20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 17, 2003
748
22
69
Richmond, VA
May 12, 2014
#29
  • May 12, 2014
  • #29
im gonna get a high torque starter, a 255 warlboro pump and harland sharp roller rockers. any recomendations on starter?

should i get an aeromotive adj. regulator too?

and we figured my 19lb injectors would work?
 
Last edited: May 12, 2014
J

jAEded

Active Member
Aug 12, 2013
418
26
39
Cali
May 12, 2014
#30
  • May 12, 2014
  • #30
Ditch the C&L MAF. You're better off with Pro-M, or the Summit Racing brand which is also Pro-M. C&L is asking for drive-ability problems.
 
J

jAEded

Active Member
Aug 12, 2013
418
26
39
Cali
May 12, 2014
#31
  • May 12, 2014
  • #31
http://www.stealth316.com/2-calc-idc.htm
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
May 12, 2014
#32
  • May 12, 2014
  • #32
fivespeedsteed said:
anyone have the part number for the steel core lower to upper ?
Click to expand...

You don't need a steel core gasket between the lower and the upper. It's antifreeze that causes the paper gaskets to fail. The section between the upper and lower intake manifold has no antifreeze running through it, thus a standard gasket is fine.
 

madspeed

Colonel Mustard
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
8,914
1,332
204
a van down by the river
May 12, 2014
#33
  • May 12, 2014
  • #33
Gearbanger 101 said:
...yeah, but they've only been in there for about 15-minutes. lol

Wait till you've had them in a while and they start looking like this....



Click to expand...


Installer error, someone forgot to cut out the coolant passeges
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
May 12, 2014
#34
  • May 12, 2014
  • #34
madspeed said:
Installer error, someone forgot to cut out the coolant passeges
Click to expand...

Keep telling yourself that.
 

madspeed

Colonel Mustard
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
8,914
1,332
204
a van down by the river
May 12, 2014
#35
  • May 12, 2014
  • #35
Installer error, someone forgot to cut out the coolant passeges
 

fivespeedsteed

20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 17, 2003
748
22
69
Richmond, VA
May 12, 2014
#36
  • May 12, 2014
  • #36
the head gasket is the same for the p heads and the stock e7 heads right
 

madspeed

Colonel Mustard
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
8,914
1,332
204
a van down by the river
May 12, 2014
#37
  • May 12, 2014
  • #37
yep, I'd go with 9333 pt1
 

fivespeedsteed

20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 17, 2003
748
22
69
Richmond, VA
May 12, 2014
#38
  • May 12, 2014
  • #38
After looking into this gasket kit I got it looks like I'm still going to be buying some gaskets. From what I can tell the intake gaskets (1250) are junk, the valve cover gaskets are cork, so there junk and the oil pan gaskets are junk. 100 bucks is allot to pay for head gaskets, timing cover, abd all the other little random gaskets. I'm thinking about returning it too and buying gaskets on my own

This is a breakdown of the parts included

http://www.dragtimes.com/parts/FORD...SET-50-302-289-306-331-347-_190702771739.html
 

mikestang63

SN Certified Technician
Aug 27, 2012
11,606
8,859
214
In the garage
May 12, 2014
#39
  • May 12, 2014
  • #39
You want a 1 piece oil pan gasket. That kit does not come with that.

You are way over thinking this. Get the following
  • Head gaskets 9333 pt1
  • intake 93334 with the Cobra/explorer upper to lower gasket seperate
  • Exhaust Felpro 1415 or Percy's
  • Timing gasket
  • Thermostat- FelPro 35440
  • Timing Cover= Felpro 45449
  • Valve Cover- Felpro rubber with steel core
  • Rear Main Seal- Felpro with Teflon Sleeve
  • Water Pump - will come with the pump or Felpro
 

fivespeedsteed

20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 17, 2003
748
22
69
Richmond, VA
May 13, 2014
#40
  • May 13, 2014
  • #40
its looking like it may be cheaper to return the kit and piece it all together, i thought i could use allot of the gaskets in the kit ill have to go adding up what they cost individually.

im gonna go with a 255 warlboro do you think i need a regulator too?

no complaints on the pa performance high torque starter?
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Engine Catch Can or not?
  • R82148V
  • Mar 4, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
9
Views
366
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 6, 2026
ctandc
C
Fox won't crank over and fuel pump won't kick on.
  • djj62478
  • Jun 7, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
16
Views
361
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 11, 2026
General karthief
Engine Explorer - Lower intake internal cleaning
  • R82148V
  • Nov 11, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
42
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 6, 2025
rednotch
My next project , a 428 build!
  • horse sence
  • Wednesday at 6:10 PM
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
18
Views
188
Classic Mustang Specific Tech 26 minutes ago
horse sence
Engine 87 NA - Tune or no Tune needed?
  • R82148V
  • Sep 17, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
379
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Sep 17, 2025
R82148V
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?