Got the baseline dyno done today

B

baglock1

The Bartender

Founding Member

Aug 25, 2001

6,612

1

78

Space Coast, FL

Jun 15, 2004

#41

• Jun 15, 2004

• #41

And the A/F for those who are interested. You can really see how the EEC dumps in the fuel when it starts to get warm. These were back to back runs and no ventalation over the rad.

 

tmoss

Gettin Wired

Founding Member

Jun 28, 2001

7,153

32

128

Saint Louis, MO

Jun 15, 2004

#42

• Jun 15, 2004

• #42

That is an excellent torque curve. Notice how the movement of A/F and heat build up didn't have a huge affect on numbers(~5HP). I'd like to know what the cast in name is on the lower intake - rear driver's side. (i.e. "ALCAN", "SAC", "CAE") and waht the part number is off the front.

 

B

baglock1

The Bartender

Founding Member

Aug 25, 2001

6,612

1

78

Space Coast, FL

Jun 15, 2004

#43

• Jun 15, 2004

• #43

tmoss said:

I'd like to know what the cast in name is on the lower intake - rear driver's side. (i.e. "ALCAN", "SAC", "CAE") and waht the part number is off the front.

Click to expand...

Hmmm, the plot thickens. I can't get the name as the upper is in the way and my inspection mirror seems to have disappeared. However, the part number is: RF E6SE 9K461 DSA.

Now it's been awhile since I've decoded part numbers, but I know that's a 1986 part (E6) and if I recall, the S is for the T-birds. I'm starting to be annoyed...

 

T

TMC

Founding Member

Jan 17, 1999

1,426

0

36

Chicago

Jun 15, 2004

#44

• Jun 15, 2004

• #44

E6 = 86 I think?

 

B

baglock1

The Bartender

Founding Member

Aug 25, 2001

6,612

1

78

Space Coast, FL

Jun 15, 2004

#45

• Jun 15, 2004

• #45

TMC said:

E6 = 86 I think?

Click to expand...

You missed the edit. I was getting fat-fingered in my mind when I first typed it.

 

B

baglock1

The Bartender

Founding Member

Aug 25, 2001

6,612

1

78

Space Coast, FL

Jun 15, 2004

#46

• Jun 15, 2004

• #46

Success! The designation cast into the rear is "SAC3".

 

T

TMC

Founding Member

Jan 17, 1999

1,426

0

36

Chicago

Jun 15, 2004

#47

• Jun 15, 2004

• #47

baglock1 said:

You missed the edit. I was getting fat-fingered in my mind when I first typed it.

Click to expand...

OK, happens to all of us

 

SuperStang83

Founding Member

Mar 21, 2001

1,693

0

49

Boyertown, Pa

Jun 15, 2004

#48

• Jun 15, 2004

• #48

Good numbers for that car! I would have loved to get a baseline!

 

tmoss

Gettin Wired

Founding Member

Jun 28, 2001

7,153

32

128

Saint Louis, MO

Jun 15, 2004

#49

• Jun 15, 2004

• #49

The SAC lowers are not quite as consistent (sand cast molds) in quality and minimum core shift as the ALCAN and most CAE intakes (investment cast molds), but you OBVIOUSLY got a good one. I've never seen a stock intake break 300RWTQ.

 

B

baglock1

The Bartender

Founding Member

Aug 25, 2001

6,612

1

78

Space Coast, FL

Jun 15, 2004

#50

• Jun 15, 2004

• #50

tmoss said:

The SAC lowers are not quite as consistent (sand cast molds) in quality and minimum core shift as the ALCAN and most CAE intakes (investment cast molds), but you OBVIOUSLY got a good one. I've never seen a stock intake break 300RWTQ.

Click to expand...

Hmmm, when I get the new intake installed I may have to reference this thread and sell the stocker.

 

94_Teal_GT

Founding Member

Aug 14, 2002

405

0

0

Palm Bay, FL

Jun 15, 2004

#51

• Jun 15, 2004

• #51

Wow! I'm not sure I'd call that a 'curve', that's more of a nice flat line! Just for fun, I ran out to see which lower is on mine, it's an SAC too. With my luck I probably got a crappy one, though

 

tmoss

Gettin Wired

Founding Member

Jun 28, 2001

7,153

32

128

Saint Louis, MO

Jun 15, 2004

#52

• Jun 15, 2004

• #52

well, it's not ALL due to the lower, but it obviously works well with your stock parts.

 

S

stunner6910

New Member

Oct 31, 2003

580

0

0

south texas

Jun 16, 2004

#53

• Jun 16, 2004

• #53

baglock1,
did you get that picture of the belt routing?

 

B

baglock1

The Bartender

Founding Member

Aug 25, 2001

6,612

1

78

Space Coast, FL

Jun 16, 2004

#54

• Jun 16, 2004

• #54

tmoss said:

well, it's not ALL due to the lower, but it obviously works well with your stock parts.

Click to expand...

Shhh! You're ruining my marketing gimmick.

stunner6910 said:

baglock1,
did you get that picture of the belt routing?

Click to expand...

Couldn't find an actual picture on my harddrive but here's a drawing I made up awhile back. It'll give you the same info.


Of course, that's the smog pump pulley at the lower left and A/C pulley on the lower right that are bypbassed.

 

S

stunner6910

New Member

Oct 31, 2003

580

0

0

south texas

Jun 16, 2004

#55

• Jun 16, 2004

• #55

thanx, i'll be using that pic