• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Got the PI intake installed good stuff

  • Thread starter Thread starter Texstang9682
  • Start date Start date Mar 15, 2007

Texstang9682

New Member
Oct 8, 2006
115
0
0
Austin, Texas
Mar 15, 2007
#1
  • Mar 15, 2007
  • #1
Well like I said I got it done. I noticed a pretty good difference in the top end. Although the max performance is being hampered by a bad O2 sensor, but I'll get it fixed. I will say one thing these cars aint got no damn torque. Even though every thing on the car is after market except the heads and cams. I did have the HPS adapters but, I decided to not use them and they are avalible.

I do have one question though I have a regular chip from superchips and I dont think it is helping one bit, so my question is do I go with a SCT XCAL2 or the SF model or do I get custom tuning done Mike Murrillo Motorsports which is very close to me with a flat fee of 550 out the door. I'm looking to get every last drop of power from the car. What do yall think?
 

d98gt

Founding Member
Mar 14, 2002
4,505
59
204
SE Texas
Mar 15, 2007
#2
  • Mar 15, 2007
  • #2
Why did you decide not to use the HPS adaptors? I'll take them off of your hands if the price is right

You could get by using a xcal2 for the time being and hold off on the true dyno tune since you are likely to upgrade your cams and maybe heads in the future. That is when the tune would net you the best gains.
 

LI98GTStang

Founding Member
Jun 22, 2000
1,715
0
36
L.I., NY
Mar 15, 2007
#3
  • Mar 15, 2007
  • #3
Good deal on the PI intake. I actually lost some (peak) torque though when I installed it on my stang. Dyno tuned is almost always going to be the better route to go as you are working off of what your car is doing at different points in the curve as opposed to going with a tune that is canned based upon other owner's stangs with similar mods.
 

d98gt

Founding Member
Mar 14, 2002
4,505
59
204
SE Texas
Mar 16, 2007
#4
  • Mar 16, 2007
  • #4
The only reason that I suggested to go with a programmer for now is that it seems he is planning to upgrade cams/heads soon which would require another dyno tune to get things straight again. I don't believe running on a programmers tune for a PI intake would be a problem until that time comes
 

Texstang9682

New Member
Oct 8, 2006
115
0
0
Austin, Texas
Mar 16, 2007
#5
  • Mar 16, 2007
  • #5
d98gt said:
Why did you decide not to use the HPS adaptors? I'll take them off of your hands if the price is right

You could get by using a xcal2 for the time being and hold off on the true dyno tune since you are likely to upgrade your cams and maybe heads in the future. That is when the tune would net you the best gains.
Click to expand...

PM me and we can talk about the adapters I dont wanna break any rules
 

Texstang9682

New Member
Oct 8, 2006
115
0
0
Austin, Texas
Mar 16, 2007
#6
  • Mar 16, 2007
  • #6
d98gt said:
The only reason that I suggested to go with a programmer for now is that it seems he is planning to upgrade cams/heads soon which would require another dyno tune to get things straight again. I don't believe running on a programmers tune for a PI intake would be a problem until that time comes
Click to expand...

Well you are half right I do plan on doing cams possibly soe comp 62's or 68's whichever dosent require new springs and has a better sounding idle. Considering the tuner is around 400 dollars (The XCAL2) I might just spend the extra 150 for the acual dyno tune. Keep in mind this is Mike Murillo he has done several 96-04's in my area and some people were reporting gains of 30 hp @ the wheels. And also the price includes a SCT big mass air meter.

And as for the heads as soon as race season starts which is soon I will be getting a job as SRS motors which is a machine shop, so maybe I can get a good deal on getting the heads worked or maybe they can do it for free. That would be nice
 

Texstang9682

New Member
Oct 8, 2006
115
0
0
Austin, Texas
Mar 16, 2007
#7
  • Mar 16, 2007
  • #7
LI98GTStang said:
Good deal on the PI intake. I actually lost some (peak) torque though when I installed it on my stang. Dyno tuned is almost always going to be the better route to go as you are working off of what your car is doing at different points in the curve as opposed to going with a tune that is canned based upon other owner's stangs with similar mods.
Click to expand...

You know come to think of it I might have lost a little bit of torque also in the process, Ya know? The stupid car has absolutly no low end grunt to it. I'm hopin the 4.10's I'm doing on Sunday will help with that.
I do appreciate the replys and opinions guys thanks!
 

Mike97gt

it doe snot
Founding Member
Jan 26, 1999
10,633
7
89
the people's republic of massachusetts
Mar 16, 2007
#8
  • Mar 16, 2007
  • #8
Texstang9682 said:
PM me and we can talk about the adapters I dont wanna break any rules
Click to expand...

 

COramprat

...I can take it. I think.
20+ Year Stangneter
Mar 2, 2003
8,474
1,463
223
Sea of Tranquility
Mar 16, 2007
#9
  • Mar 16, 2007
  • #9
Texstang9682 said:
You know come to think of it I might have lost a little bit of torque also in the process, Ya know? The stupid car has absolutly no low end grunt to it. I'm hopin the 4.10's I'm doing on Sunday will help with that.
I do appreciate the replys and opinions guys thanks!
Click to expand...

4.10's FTW.

It won't jerk your head off but it will make a TON of difference.

The Comp 262's do not require springs but some would say to change them anyway. I didn't and have about 50K miles since the swap with no issues.

Not much of a lope from the 262's, wasn't what I was looking for anyway, but the power is pretty decent.
 

d98gt

Founding Member
Mar 14, 2002
4,505
59
204
SE Texas
Mar 16, 2007
#10
  • Mar 16, 2007
  • #10
A dyno tune would be nice if you have the money to hand over for one. You'll pick up power from it and make sure your A/F is right where it needs to be

I've heard many good things about Murillo and his shop
 
M

Mel96GT

New Member
Aug 31, 2004
255
1
0
San Diego
Mar 16, 2007
#11
  • Mar 16, 2007
  • #11
You should get some PI cams. They are a cheap mod if you do them yourself and they give you a nice mid to upper range power increase. It will also tach to 5500 rpm's which is a must if you have 4.10's.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 95 GT/Saleen Supercharged 331 install
  • from6to8
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
970
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
B
Engine Strange Noise
  • burntokita
  • May 8, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
411
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 11, 2026
keel
B
Where to go from here on my build…
  • B0udreaux
  • Jul 14, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
231
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 18, 2026
AeroCoupe
Engine Suggestions on an engine rebuild. Stock cam/GT40Ps or aftermarket on both for a fun weekend driver?
  • MadSquirrelTech
  • Apr 28, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
877
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 7, 2026
MadSquirrelTech
Buying with a bad motor?
  • djj62478
  • Mar 8, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
305
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Mar 11, 2026
TTSaleen
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?