• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Ground clearance with a 4R70W trans pan on an AODE

  • Thread starter Thread starter HISSIN50
  • Start date Start date Mar 25, 2008

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
34
129
Mar 25, 2008
#1
  • Mar 25, 2008
  • #1
Howdy folks.

I somehow forgot to post a thread up over here regarding ground clearance with a 4R trans pan on our cars. For those that have done it, did you have ground clearance issues like I'm having?

Here's a thread I started in mod-motor land. I had meant to ask you guys if you have issues with it but somehow forgot.

Anyhow, that was my experience with it, in case it helps someone in the future.

I obviously welcome your thoughts or experiences on the subject.




P.S. Matt, if you happen to read this, can you please change the title to read Ground Clearance.......... (Bold = the change).
I think that will be more concise for searchers. EDIT: Thanks Matt.
 

94GTCoupe

10 Year Member
May 7, 2006
1,412
92
79
CA
Mar 25, 2008
#2
  • Mar 25, 2008
  • #2
how's your tranny mount?is it stock?would'nt a new energy suspension poly mount raise the tranny a little to get you the clearance you need? i had replaced the stock mount when i still had the aode and it raised the tranny up a little.
 

Stanger007

Founding Member
Sep 26, 2001
2,015
2
46
Baton Rouge, LA
Mar 25, 2008
#3
  • Mar 25, 2008
  • #3
JT, no clearance problems here at stock ride height -- mine has a drain plug in the sump - I can snap you a picture of it if you'd like.

Wes
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
34
129
Mar 25, 2008
#4
  • Mar 25, 2008
  • #4
Thanks guys. Davis3, I have the stock mount in there, though I do have a spare Prothane mount lying here. I should try to take a picture of it - the entire pick-up cavity is pretty much below my O/R pipe. I'd need a lot of upward movement in the trans to get the pick-up out of harms way.

Wes, as always, thank you for the reply and offer for a picture. I'm not sure if it'd help because you have such a different exhaust set-up. I would ask if happen to know if your pick-up cavity is the low point in that region. That'd make me feel better atleast.

Me-thinks this is all the reason why we have the short pan from the factory. You cant even get those anymore from what I gather.

I think I'll have to put my thinking cap on and see if I can make a skid plate or something like that.

Many thanks again guys.
 

Bosko5.0

Active Member
May 18, 2006
1,067
0
37
longwood, FL
Mar 26, 2008
#5
  • Mar 26, 2008
  • #5
Jt ground clearance is the only reason I don't run a deeper pan. I mean Last week I bottomed out on the x brace a couple times going 30 If I had a deeper pan I would be on the side of the road. I like the idea of a skid plate but that means more weight, and you'll have to make it thick enough.
 

gcomfx.com

Founding Member
Oct 22, 2002
3,690
0
56
Republic, MO
Mar 26, 2008
#6
  • Mar 26, 2008
  • #6
I went with a 4x4 AODE pan. It holds a "little" more fluid due to the deeper section for the pickup tube. The pickup tube is also a great benefit. You have to order the 4x4 filter which comes with a tube built in. It'll help ensure you always get fluid even if you are low.
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
34
129
Mar 26, 2008
#7
  • Mar 26, 2008
  • #7
Bosko, I know whatcha mean.

Paul, Is the 4x4 pan about as deep as the 4R pan (the latter measured from the bottom of the pick-up to the rail)? I agree that if one is going to have a low pan, the 4x4 version probably is the way to go. I never considered it when buying a pan. Everything I read on another site said the 4R (passenger car) pan was the route to go and I didn't question it.
 

SN95StangMan

New Member
Jul 5, 2003
1,292
0
0
Lynwood, CA
Mar 26, 2008
#8
  • Mar 26, 2008
  • #8
I have the B&M deep aluminum pan. It sticks down a lot further than the stocker, but I have never hit anything with it. I'll get some pics when I get home, because my laptop is not letting me attach files. I would imagine that this thing sits lower than the 4r70W pan.
 

Stanger007

Founding Member
Sep 26, 2001
2,015
2
46
Baton Rouge, LA
Mar 26, 2008
#9
  • Mar 26, 2008
  • #9




There are a couple of mine. It is not as low as I thought - the headers will bottom out way before the pan will.

Wes
 

SN95StangMan

New Member
Jul 5, 2003
1,292
0
0
Lynwood, CA
Mar 26, 2008
#10
  • Mar 26, 2008
  • #10
Here you go




 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
34
129
Mar 31, 2008
#11
  • Mar 31, 2008
  • #11
Wes and Eddie, thanks so much.

Looks like you both are covered nicely, Wes with the LT's and Eddie with what looks to be a really solid pan.

For future searchers, here's the 4R pan with a 94 AODE. You can see why I'm concerned with not having a skid plate or something to kinda protect it. I still haven't had a chance to figure something out.

 

gcomfx.com

Founding Member
Oct 22, 2002
3,690
0
56
Republic, MO
Mar 31, 2008
#12
  • Mar 31, 2008
  • #12
HISSIN50 said:
Bosko, I know whatcha mean.

Paul, Is the 4x4 pan about as deep as the 4R pan (the latter measured from the bottom of the pick-up to the rail)? I agree that if one is going to have a low pan, the 4x4 version probably is the way to go. I never considered it when buying a pan. Everything I read on another site said the 4R (passenger car) pan was the route to go and I didn't question it.
Click to expand...

The 4x4 pan is identical to the stock pan except for the small hump in it. The hump is similar to wes's pic, but doesn't have a plug in the bottom of it.
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
34
129
Mar 31, 2008
#13
  • Mar 31, 2008
  • #13
gcomfx.com said:
The 4x4 pan is identical to the stock pan except for the small hump in it. The hump is similar to wes's pic, but doesn't have a plug in the bottom of it.
Click to expand...

Thanks Paul.

I'm going to get some 4x4 pan specs and compare. I know my picture sucked but you can see having that hump hanging down aint no good on mine.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Drivetrain 83’ Glx convertible C5 Trans help!
  • JacksonJared2113
  • Dec 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
393
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 26, 2025
JacksonJared2113
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
887
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
0
V6 to V8 Swap info
  • 02_2v_Curtis
  • Jan 11, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
719
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jan 11, 2026
02_2v_Curtis
0
SN Mustang Magnum T56 swap
  • revhead347
  • May 24, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
15
Views
6K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jun 28, 2026
GearHeadGuy
H
Drivetrain 4R70W clutch friction/metals/piston set up questions for transmission guru
  • Hizdudeness
  • Apr 4, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
980
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 15, 2024
slow84lx
S
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?