• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

GT40 Lower Intake question...

  • Thread starter Thread starter 01_SVT
  • Start date Start date Apr 1, 2012

01_SVT

Member
Dec 22, 2003
117
0
16
Nassu County, New York
Apr 1, 2012
#1
  • Apr 1, 2012
  • #1
Hey Guys

I bought a gt40 tubular intake that came with the lower intake pictured below. I had it hot tanked and was prepping it for painting when it dawned on me that there is no EGR port or port for the air intake sensor.

I have a 1989 GT and being that I want to reuse the EGR valve, which lower intake plenum should I be looking for? I didn't realize there were different ones.

Please advise.

Also, it looks like I will be selling this one or trading for what I need.

View attachment 152304
View attachment 152305


THANKS!
 

87-t-top-gt

Member
Jan 30, 2012
106
3
18
annapolis, md
Apr 1, 2012
#2
  • Apr 1, 2012
  • #2
If I remeember correctly it cost me $210 including shipping to/from MO from MD for TMOSS (thomas moss and brother matt) to port, sand, paint and drill provisions for egr return line and act sensor. Food for thought. As far as the years go, I cant help you there.
 

Maryland Stang

Active Member
Aug 21, 2002
1,656
30
39
Greenville, NC
Apr 1, 2012
#3
  • Apr 1, 2012
  • #3
That lower intake is off of a 97 and later Explorer/Mountaineer. The ACT sensor boss is in place on the number 5 intake runner. You just need to drill and tap for it.

There are lower intakes on Ebay that have the EGR port. They usually sell for a little more than the non EGR manifolds.
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,176
17,878
224
Massachusetts
Apr 1, 2012
#4
  • Apr 1, 2012
  • #4
I can see the suffix on the part number is -BB

That's a later Ford Explorer lower intake


Sent from my iPhone 4S using Tapatalk
 

01_SVT

Member
Dec 22, 2003
117
0
16
Nassu County, New York
Apr 1, 2012
#5
  • Apr 1, 2012
  • #5
What do you guys suggest I should do? Do I just sell this and buy one with egr/sensor port? not sure which year lower intake I should be looking for
 

stykthyn

I want to measure mine. It doesn't look that tall.
15 Year Member
Jul 6, 2006
5,232
2,652
223
gainesville
Apr 1, 2012
#6
  • Apr 1, 2012
  • #6
You want an intake from a 96 explorer.
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,176
17,878
224
Massachusetts
Apr 1, 2012
#7
  • Apr 1, 2012
  • #7
The part number for the lower will be exactly the same as the part number you have now except it will end in -BA instead of -BB


Sent from my iPhone 4S using Tapatalk
 

88LX

Founding Member
Nov 15, 1999
327
3
29
Chicago, IL
Apr 7, 2012
#8
  • Apr 7, 2012
  • #8
you need an intake from an explorer built no later than early 96. anything previous to that is good to go. here is a pic of what we are talking about:
 

Attachments

  • boss1.webp
    36.3 KB · Views: 485

stykthyn

I want to measure mine. It doesn't look that tall.
15 Year Member
Jul 6, 2006
5,232
2,652
223
gainesville
Apr 8, 2012
#9
  • Apr 8, 2012
  • #9
Prior to 96 there were no v8 explorers
 

88LX

Founding Member
Nov 15, 1999
327
3
29
Chicago, IL
Apr 8, 2012
#10
  • Apr 8, 2012
  • #10
yes, thanks for clarifying. explorers built in late 95 had v8s for the 96 model year and late 96 for the 97 model year. at least through my junk yard digging thats what ive discovered.
 
P

Princess Peter Puffer

New Member
Mar 30, 2012
4
0
1
Apr 9, 2012
#11
  • Apr 9, 2012
  • #11
pull up google,
find a pick and pull near you
you need any explorer-merk thats a 96 and, with the 5.0 mo´tow
take the coil pack braket out, its 3 bolts cut all the sparkplug wires
remove the wiring from the computer that is attached to the firewall that is directly above the plenum, so the back bolt can come out
everything else is straight foward and all wrentchin
hustle the guy tell him you only brought 30 bucks its shouldnt be any more then 45
it takes an hour tops

dont pay people to do things your capable of

i think i have 2 of the 96s ones and a lot of the others if anyone in ny needs
 
P

Princess Peter Puffer

New Member
Mar 30, 2012
4
0
1
Apr 9, 2012
#12
  • Apr 9, 2012
  • #12
also if you have it all apart deff port the bottem and get the top inlet ported, for your t.b. its stock 67mm or some stupid odd number. i did mine for a 75mm. helped my gt40ps breath easy.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
Engine Replacing upper/lower intake, anything else?
  • 91GTstroked
  • Nov 4, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
14
Views
833
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 26, 2024
AeroCoupe
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
689
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 28, 2026
Noobz347
Progress Thread Giving an abandoned 88 GT project a new chance at life
  • jaketractor
  • Jan 9, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
27
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 20, 2025
Noobz347
A
95 Gt intermittent backfire
  • A_A_Ron
  • May 26, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
396
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 26, 2025
A_A_Ron
A
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?