• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

GT40P heads and 289 engine question

  • Thread starter Thread starter pazcarguy
  • Start date Start date Aug 25, 2008
P

pazcarguy

New Member
Mar 30, 2005
65
0
0
Pittsburgh, PA
Aug 25, 2008
#1
  • Aug 25, 2008
  • #1
I have an opportunity to purchase some new GT40P heads for a 1966 289 that I am building. The block has been decked and has new flattop pistons for a CR of just under 9.5~1 with 60 cc heads. I was told (haven't been able to verify) that the GT40P heads won't work on an early 289 beacuse they are set up for a roller motor. I thought this didn't matter as I am using a flat tappet cam. Is their anything I am missing? I was planning on using 1.6 roller rockers and didn't know waht pushrod to use. I am going to use the Edelbrock Performer RPM cam (#7122)(.520 lift). I didn't know if the stock GT40P valve springs were suitable for this if I can indeed use the head. Anybody out there do this before? Brian
 

Decurion

Member
Sep 28, 2006
353
0
16
Livonia, MI
Aug 25, 2008
#2
  • Aug 25, 2008
  • #2
Im not sure why they wouldnt work, but the stock valve springs will not hold up to .520 lift. I dont have specs, but my guess is a stock cam with 1.7 Cobra rockers (.478 lift) is only reliable to 5,000, maybe 5500 if you want to push it.
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Aug 25, 2008
#3
  • Aug 25, 2008
  • #3
You might need to upgrade the springs for that cam. Try doing a search and compare the spring specs first. The Explorer cam's specs are 256/266 advertised duration, .422/.445 lift with 1.6 rockers. No change in springs needed for this cam with 1.7 rockers. (lift increases to .445/.473 with 1.7's) Most stock Ford springs are OK with up to about .530 lift. The spring rates are what would concern you most. You may also need to match up the coolant ports between the heads and block too.
 

woodsnake

15 Year Member
Jan 16, 2007
1,352
15
69
Hicksville, NY
Aug 26, 2008
#4
  • Aug 26, 2008
  • #4
I have that same cam in my 68. It was a night mare. You need the Edelbrock springs, and will have to check for proper push rod length. I didn't have the right springs at first, and didn't measure for push rods, so now I'm on my 2nd cam, third set of push rods, and 2nd set of roller rockers as well.....
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Engine Pushrod Length?
  • foxbodyclark
  • Jan 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
1
Views
346
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 25, 2025
limp
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
736
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
G
Anyone Extrude Hone or Flow Bench Speed Pro Heads?
  • giddyup306v1.1
  • Mar 1, 2025
  • Fox Engine Swaparoo
Replies
10
Views
500
Fox Engine Swaparoo Mar 29, 2026
2000xp8
D
Heads Cam Intake
  • dropteeth
  • Sep 19, 2023
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 19, 2023
dropteeth
D
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?