Guys with manual racks - regret it??

I like mine, its not a dd but does get driven to the track.
Turns easy and I have 225x60x15`s in front.

I was thinking about doing the same .. didnt have power steering in my H22 civic coupe (dont hate me lol blew up my 00 GT) and it wasnt to bad got used to it then got back to ps and looked like i was tryin to rip the steering wheel off lol

im wondering the same thing...is it a big difference? how much harder to turn the wheel?

My '72 Cutlass had manual steering and manual 4 wheel drum brakes, and it weighed 4000 pounds. It didn't stop for ****!!! It also had a ridiculous steering ratio: from straight to full lock the steering wheel went around three full turns!


As long as the car has forward momentum. manual steering is fine. I'm not the strongest guy in the world... I'm 6 foot 1 and weigh about 170 pounds, and it never gave me trouble. Go for it!

Had manual steering and manual transmissions in the Geo Metro and Honda CRX I owned years ago. Given, they run much more narrow tires (well, not so much on the CRX - I think they were 225 width, IIRC), but I really couldn't tell the difference unless I was absolutely sitting dead-still and trying to turn the wheel. Even at 5-10 MPH, it was easy. Had a much more solid steering feel, as well.

Only other experience I have with manual steering was the time my notch stalled out on me and I had to steer it around a corner with the engine dead, or the (third) time my '84 decided to shred and throw a belt - both times, even with the power rack (and no operating pump at the time, obviously), the steering felt almost exactly the same as it normally did, just slightly more weighted. People get freaked out by the idea of manual steering, I think, when they just try to see what it's like to turn the wheel with the car sitting still and the engine off. As stated, once you're moving, you're fine.

If you do go manual, I would (no pun intended) steer clear of the "sport" ratio racks and go for a "standard" ratio, as the latter will require much less steering effort overall. If I wind up having to put in a new rack in my notch, I'll be going with the manual rack kit Summit is selling for around $300 - has the rack, tie rod ends, and steering shaft, everything you need (except for how to re-route the belt after you no longer have a P/S pump or, presumably, an A/C compressor).

i had the manual rack in my black one when i got it, i will see if i have a pic of the steering wheel still, it has a hole worn through it. I thought i was a huge pita and if you ever want to get a drink or something (b/c there are no cup holders) you kill your self trying to get home.

if its a drag car i dont think you would mind, but on the street its a pain

I have a FR standard rack in my fox with 17x9's up front. No problem, it is a little harder stopped but moving it is fine for weekend toy.

Darkwriter77 said:

Had manual steering and manual transmissions in the Geo Metro and Honda CRX I owned years ago. Given, they run much more narrow tires (well, not so much on the CRX - I think they were 225 width, IIRC), but I really couldn't tell the difference unless I was absolutely sitting dead-still and trying to turn the wheel. Even at 5-10 MPH, it was easy. Had a much more solid steering feel, as well.


If you do go manual, I would (no pun intended) steer clear of the "sport" ratio racks and go for a "standard" ratio, as the latter will require much less steering effort overall. If I wind up having to put in a new rack in my notch, I'll be going with the manual rack kit Summit is selling for around $300 - has the rack, tie rod ends, and steering shaft, everything you need (except for how to re-route the belt after you no longer have a P/S pump or, presumably, an A/C compressor).

Click to expand...

+1
my civic coupe that got stolen!grrrr.......had the no ps. option and a 5speed. i loved it. from a stand still it wasnt the best but man did it make the car feel so much more solid. i would love it for drifting or something or in car that is a weekend cruiser....less drag on the 5.0 = lil hp and mpg gains. power steering is just a luxury. a must for the soccer mom van but who cares on the point and shoot mustang hot rodder.

Darkwriter77 said:

(well, not so much on the CRX - I think they were 225 width, IIRC)

Click to expand...

On stock wheels? 195's at best, and they would be fat rubber on a CRX. I don't think 225's will even fit under a CRX

QUICK91LX said:

On stock wheels? 195's at best, and they would be fat rubber on a CRX. I don't think 225's will even fit under a CRX

Click to expand...

I don't remember exactly. It's been a few years. They did look pretty wide, at least for a little econo-box turd car ... nothing like the little 165/70/R12's or whatever pathetic size came stock on a Geo Metro. Those things were like skinny lawnmower tires...

Either way, anything with manual steering isn't going to be terrible, as long as you're moving forward at something faster than an absolute crawl. I think too many of us these days are just spoiled to feather-light steering setups that used to only be found in high-end Cadillacs and Lincolns - our arm muscles are withering away from lack of use!

I do regret going manual on mine. Parking and trying to get into my garage is a pita, with the manual rack. Good workout though?!? I had it with skinnies(195's) and now 245's. Just a mod I dont think that was worth it. Keep the power, it makes a much more enjoyable cruiser.