• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Harmonic Balancer

  • Thread starter Thread starter onefstsnake
  • Start date Start date Feb 12, 2006

onefstsnake

New Member
Nov 25, 2005
792
1
0
Northern VA
Feb 12, 2006
#1
  • Feb 12, 2006
  • #1
Well my old one took a dump. Rubber pulled out and you can move the entire thing by hand.

2 of the bolts were finger tight...

I have a few questions.

1. Which Ford balancer do I need? They make a few 50oz ones...

2. Should the balancer bolts be Black Oxide Steel? B/C mine are silver in color and are hex bolts.
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
33
129
Feb 12, 2006
#2
  • Feb 12, 2006
  • #2
My bolts were black - looks like someone lost the oem bolts when they installed U/D's (and perhaps had to use allen head bolts). Then they tossed some crap on there when they reverted back to stock pulleys.

Not sure on the Ford balancer. For the budget minded, a Pioneer (3021 is non-SFI IIRC) or PP unit is how I would go.

Good luck.
 

onefstsnake

New Member
Nov 25, 2005
792
1
0
Northern VA
Feb 12, 2006
#3
  • Feb 12, 2006
  • #3
it has U/D pulleys on it.

I might get some black oxide bolt just in case.

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/HARM...ewItemQQcategoryZ33616QQitemZ8036661868QQrdZ1

Does that look decent? I would rather not use one with the rubber like the stock one.
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
33
129
Feb 12, 2006
#4
  • Feb 12, 2006
  • #4
onefstsnake said:
it has U/D pulleys on it.

I might get some black oxide bolt just in case.

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/HARM...ewItemQQcategoryZ33616QQitemZ8036661868QQrdZ1

Does that look decent? I would rather not use one with the rubber like the stock one.
Click to expand...
I gotta say...................... that I am not a fan of fluid dampers on street cars (I might use one on a serious track car that spools like a mofo). That is just me...............

If you get a quality elastomeric unit (rubber like stock, but NOT stock), it should hold up great. If wanting Pioneer, the non-SFI unit is often a ways under 100 bucks and available at some parts stores you guys have around the nation.

The Pioneer SFI is a nice piece and is 180 ish.

PP units are about 80 bucks (non SFI) and double that or so for SFI.

Not speaking of the above items, since I feel that they are all decent. But note that SFI does not necessarily mean it is of better quality.
 

Black1987Stang

Active Member
Aug 22, 2004
1,422
0
37
Jersey Shore
Feb 12, 2006
#5
  • Feb 12, 2006
  • #5
HISSIN50 said:
I gotta say...................... that I am not a fan of fluid dampers on street cars (I might use one on a serious track car that spools like a mofo). That is just me...............

If you get a quality elastomeric unit (rubber like stock, but NOT stock), it should hold up great. If wanting Pioneer, the non-SFI unit is often a ways under 100 bucks and available at some parts stores you guys have around the nation.

The Pioneer SFI is a nice piece and is 180 ish.

PP units are about 80 bucks (non SFI) and double that or so for SFI.

Not speaking of the above items, since I feel that they are all decent. But note that SFI does not necessarily mean it is of better quality.
Click to expand...

Just curious, why dont you like the fluid filled dampeners?
 

onefstsnake

New Member
Nov 25, 2005
792
1
0
Northern VA
Feb 12, 2006
#6
  • Feb 12, 2006
  • #6
I really would like something that isnt going to separate.

The ATI ones look nice but are $350...
 

onefstsnake

New Member
Nov 25, 2005
792
1
0
Northern VA
Feb 12, 2006
#7
  • Feb 12, 2006
  • #7
Does this balancer look decent?

http://www.latemodelrestoration.com/iwwida.pvx?;item?item_no=PP-90007K 1&comp=LRS
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
33
129
Feb 12, 2006
#8
  • Feb 12, 2006
  • #8
The fluid dampers can produce some funky characteristics. A lot of builders dont like using them and some motors will not be warrantied if one is used.

I would have to research it on a physics level to figure out why. Once I got that far, I pulled back and dismissed them as an option without researching further.

Fastsnake, that unit reportedly does very well - a lot of guys like them. I have to say that for the money, a Pioneer SFI unit should be the same price. I would use the Pioneer personally. But that PP unit (I mentioned it earlier) should work fine.

Good luck.
 

onefstsnake

New Member
Nov 25, 2005
792
1
0
Northern VA
Feb 12, 2006
#9
  • Feb 12, 2006
  • #9
the Profesional Products 80007 looks nice too.

Not SFI approved but nice for $80
Looks like PepBoys has it to, ill see tomorrrow.

Anyone know what size the balancer bolt is?
I tried a 7/8th" and its too small.
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
33
129
Feb 12, 2006
#10
  • Feb 12, 2006
  • #10
I think the crank bolt is 15/16".

Also, I would use a balancer install and removal tool, which can be rented from the parts store. I used a kit that had both that was 'loaned' from CSK.

Good luck.
 

90mustangGT

I felt sorry for girls because
Founding Member
Jan 15, 2002
2,773
17
89
Dallas, GA
Feb 13, 2006
#11
  • Feb 13, 2006
  • #11
The problem with the fluid types is that they can go bad easily if the fluid leaks out, even a little fluid, and it makes it worse than no balancer at all. The elastomer (sp) is kind of like an advanced rubber. I noticed the difference in smoothness when I did a Romac SFI 50oz.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Drivetrain 83’ Glx convertible C5 Trans help!
  • JacksonJared2113
  • Dec 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
320
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 26, 2025
JacksonJared2113
Wanting to replace my BOSS 351C Engine Harmonic Balancer - Questions about 'Balance?'
  • 69machmike
  • Oct 31, 2024
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
553
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Nov 5, 2024
Realmongo
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
648
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 28, 2026
Noobz347
  • Locked
Engine Might have to get a Dart block but don't want to and if I do, then 363 instead of 331. Thoughts on what I've already bought so far.......
  • from6to8
  • Jul 8, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
406
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 8, 2025
Noobz347
B
water pump installation questions
  • B0udreaux
  • Feb 5, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
38
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 28, 2026
General karthief
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?