Has Anyone noticed much power increase with 1.7 rockers?

Jay5_o said:
the 1.6 is stock in 87-93 5.0's... are they not ?

Yeah but their about as precision as hand held pencil sharpener. The ratio can vary anywhere from 1.5 to 1.7 per rocker arm. some good aftermarket rockers you know are true to their claim.
 
I'd say that if you're planning to stick with the stock cam and you've got other intake and exhaust mods already, go ahead and grab the 1.7rr's along with a better set of springs. But it’s going to do little for a stock engine, so make it one of your last mods.

I've got them on mine (1.7's), but i've also got ported heads, intake, full exhaust, pulleys, CAI, gears, etc, etc. Don't expect huge power gains either way, but they're worth a few ponies along with other mods. Probably in the 5-10fwhp range.

If you're planning on swapping out the cam, the stick with the 1.6rr’s and concentrate on cam selection to provide any added lift you might want. 1.7rr's have been shown to place added stress on valve train (increased side load and friction on valve guides and valve stems), especially when the horsepower and RPM potential starts to climb.

How's that....clear as mud?
 
Mattys5Oh said:
When I installed mine the SOTP dyno said I gained alot. I was actually very impressed. They are 1.72's and fit under the VC and the stock springs seem to be handling it well.


Matt
The SOTP dyno can be a little bias at times. Do you think you actually gained any real power, or is it because you mentally you know you’ve added an aftermarket part and think that you should have. The nice thing about them is their accuracy compared to the stockers and since they’re roller, they cut back on friction and allow the engine to rev a little more freely, but I doubt any real power was achieved. That’s assuming that you’re still running a mainly stock set up. As for the valve springs….changing them isn’t mandatory, but some have experience a little float at the upper end of the RPM limits. That’s why I upgraded mine.