• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

has anyone used?

  • Thread starter Thread starter gr8one
  • Start date Start date Apr 25, 2010
Status
Not open for further replies.
G

gr8one

Member
Jun 28, 2008
52
0
6
Ft. Meade Polk Co FL
Apr 25, 2010
#1
  • Apr 25, 2010
  • #1
has anyone used the New ultra-budget front disc setup or any other products from scarebird? if so i would like some feed back good or bad before i invest in there product,
 

shoguun

New Member
Jul 28, 2009
184
0
0
Apr 25, 2010
#2
  • Apr 25, 2010
  • #2
Someone just did a thread about it look down or on page 2
 
T

TeamEntity

New Member
May 4, 2005
130
1
0
Apr 28, 2010
#3
  • Apr 28, 2010
  • #3
regardless of what some peeps will tell you. it's a great product. I have em on my 65 and they work great. It's a simple solution to an expensive situation.
 
G

gr8one

Member
Jun 28, 2008
52
0
6
Ft. Meade Polk Co FL
Apr 28, 2010
#4
  • Apr 28, 2010
  • #4
thanks teamentity
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Apr 28, 2010
#5
  • Apr 28, 2010
  • #5
shoguun said:
Someone just did a thread about it look down or on page 2
Click to expand...

Whoever "scarebird" was, he's been **** canned from this forum for posting that thread. He and the thread are history. I wouldn't bolt on stamped steel caliper brackets on a go cart and then trust my life to them. Ford used cast iron caliper brackets for a reason. They don't flex, vibrate, or crack from vibration. That would be a neet experience.........driving cross countrry with them, then while descending a steep grade or slamming on the brakes at a busy intersection, only to find that the calipers aren't attached to the spindles any longer.
 
G

gr8one

Member
Jun 28, 2008
52
0
6
Ft. Meade Polk Co FL
Apr 28, 2010
#6
  • Apr 28, 2010
  • #6
ok thanks for you input
 

Scarebird

Member
Jul 22, 2005
42
0
6
Bothell, Washington
Apr 30, 2010
#7
  • Apr 30, 2010
  • #7
D.Hearne said:
Whoever "scarebird" was, he's been **** canned from this forum for posting that thread. He and the thread are history...
Click to expand...

One of the unfortunate things about the internet is any fool with access to an IP can post whatever stray thoughts are bouncing around their empty heads. To paraphrase Twain or somebody wittier than me the rumours of my banning are premature.

Hearne's understanding of engineering is as flawed as his information of my banning. This new design is a simple, flat plate - nothing is stronger. The load is contained to a single plane - no twisting or bending can occur. His simpleminded twaddle about vibration and cracking are just that - obviously he has not been to a track and noted all the tubular control arms; they undergo far greater stresses and loads than a brake bracket and there they are...

Thank you to my customers and friends who emailed me about this thread.
 

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
tucson,az
Apr 30, 2010
#8
  • Apr 30, 2010
  • #8
i dont have any personal experience with scarebirds systems, yet, but except for a few early issues with their six cylinder hubs, and a few other minor issues, scarebird puts out a very good product. i just wish they would come up with an 11" front rotor for six cylinder cars.
 

Scarebird

Member
Jul 22, 2005
42
0
6
Bothell, Washington
Apr 30, 2010
#9
  • Apr 30, 2010
  • #9
rbohm said:
i dont have any personal experience with scarebirds systems, yet, but except for a few early issues with their six cylinder hubs, and a few other minor issues, scarebird puts out a very good product. i just wish they would come up with an 11" front rotor for six cylinder cars.
Click to expand...

If you can get 4 others committed we can make it happen.
 

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
tucson,az
Apr 30, 2010
#10
  • Apr 30, 2010
  • #10
Scarebird said:
If you can get 4 others committed we can make it happen.
Click to expand...

should i start with DH? and can you recommend a good asylum?

i would think that it would take just a bit of research since you already have 11" rotors for V8 cars. i have done some research, but i have yet to find a brake rotor with four lugs that is 11" or so.
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
May 1, 2010
#11
  • May 1, 2010
  • #11
Scarebird said:
One of the unfortunate things about the internet is any fool with access to an IP can post whatever stray thoughts are bouncing around their empty heads. To paraphrase Twain or somebody wittier than me the rumours of my banning are premature.

Hearne's understanding of engineering is as flawed as his information of my banning. This new design is a simple, flat plate - nothing is stronger. The load is contained to a single plane - no twisting or bending can occur. His simpleminded twaddle about vibration and cracking are just that - obviously he has not been to a track and noted all the tubular control arms; they undergo far greater stresses and loads than a brake bracket and there they are...

Thank you to my customers and friends who emailed me about this thread.
Click to expand...

My thinking is flawed ? You obviously don't have any concept of the stresses uinvolved here. There's no vibration ? Heat plays no role ? I've got 35 years of practical, hands on experience dealing with and seeing firsthand what happens to poorly thought out, poorly engineered products. Yours is one such. Yes, a simple flat piece of steel is strong when subjected to stress in a fashion yours is intended to be. BUT, you've failed to realize there's more stress involved here when the vehicle is in motion. You've got massive amounts of heat generated when the brakes are applied, plus vibration. Both are well known to weaken even the strongest steel. Your puny thin flat plate is a poor choice to combat this. As is your throwing in the bit about tubular control arms, that has absolutely nothing to do with the subject at hand. (I've seen tubular steel break too, many times ) As for my comment about your bannning, how come that thread you started was deleted by the Mods ? There's no trace of it to be found here. You're obviously doing something that's not allowed here in selling your product.
 

Scarebird

Member
Jul 22, 2005
42
0
6
Bothell, Washington
May 1, 2010
#12
  • May 1, 2010
  • #12
D.Hearne said:
...I've got 35 years of practical, hands on experience dealing with and seeing firsthand what happens to poorly thought out, poorly engineered products. Yours is one such...

Yes, a simple flat piece of steel is strong when subjected to stress in a fashion yours is intended to be...
Click to expand...

*sigh*

So which is it? You are talking out of both sides of you mouth here.

Please elaborate exactly what you did for 35 years to qualify you to judge the engineering here - and kindly use that "knowledge" to explain to us how a 0.240" piece of flat steel is going to fail.

We're waiting.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

S
Brakes are engaged while driving
  • stevetbright
  • May 31, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
35
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- May 31, 2026
stevetbright
S
How do we feel about first gen fuel caps?
  • Teen'93stang5.0
  • Apr 25, 2026
  • Mustang Sound & Shine All
Replies
4
Views
292
Mustang Sound & Shine All May 3, 2026
General karthief
Anyone used a Onegauge?
  • revhead347
  • Sep 2, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
170
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 3, 2025
revhead347
8
87 lx 4cyl to v8 project 4 lug disc conversion questions
  • 87lx428
  • Mar 24, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
470
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 25, 2026
87lx428
8
Fox Xtremely high fuel consumption
  • PonyGTrider
  • Apr 11, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 9 10 11
Replies
213
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 9, 2026
PonyGTrider
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?