• Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-

have roush rears..question about fronts...

  • Thread starter Thread starter 02GTRX
  • Start date Start date Apr 23, 2009
0

02GTRX

I told an admin to shut up...now I live with the S
20+ Year Stangneter
Sep 27, 2004
213
8
19
Apr 23, 2009
#1
  • Apr 23, 2009
  • #1
after lowering the rear with just the roush rears it now sits about .5" lower in the rear than the front. If I get the roush fronts which lower it 1-1.5" will I need caster/camber plates and all kinds of other crap only to find that the tires will still prematurely wear on the edges even after alignment?? this was a big problem on my 02 and not something I want to deal with on this one so if theres any other options Id be glad to hear them. BIG difference with just the roush rears btw, no more axle hop over bumps and reduced wheel hop.
 
B

blackgt460

Active Member
Jun 3, 2003
109
21
28
South East Pennsylvania
Apr 23, 2009
#2
  • Apr 23, 2009
  • #2
That's weird, every car I see with just Roush rears still sits lower in the front. Is the pic in your sig with the rears on? If so it looks fine to me. If it's a problem for you I would just get the front's. Any more pic's? I want to get the rears also and would like to see if what you describe happens to me if I could tolerate it.
 
0

02GTRX

I told an admin to shut up...now I live with the S
20+ Year Stangneter
Sep 27, 2004
213
8
19
Apr 23, 2009
#3
  • Apr 23, 2009
  • #3
I just posted some in the "I want to buy 20" wheels" thread. You can kinda see it there. The pic in the signature is stock springs. Even with the stock tires and wheels it was lower in the rear. I'd say its pretty noticeable.
Posted via Mobile Device
 

DarkFireGT

Playing with my wife's really makes me want one.
10 Year Member
May 23, 2004
692
10
89
East Moline, IL
Apr 23, 2009
#4
  • Apr 23, 2009
  • #4
Yeah, that is weird. The Roush Rears only definitely evened mine out. Have you done any weight reduction up front?

In any event, adding the fronts will not be enough to need caster/camber plates. Just come camber bolts, at the most. However, if you get the fronts that match the rears, I believe the drop is 1" or less. An alignment probably wouldn't even be needed.
 

walter

Founding Member
Aug 13, 1998
1,054
0
46
Houston TX
Apr 23, 2009
#5
  • Apr 23, 2009
  • #5
It all depends on whether or not you're running a staggered setup.

My alignment came down to -1.3 Camber up front after installing the Roush springs/shocks with GT500 insulators. the maximum allowed by Ford is -1.5 which is a good amount of negative camber. Normally I think the car sits at -0.5 so you're tripling your camber and by that token reducing your tire life. If the tires are staggered then you'll want to get some plates or a correction kit of some type. If not just rotate your tires more often and offset your wear.

The advantage of getting plates is that you'll get rid of the weak stock insulator which fails on lowered cars. This will give you easier adjustability if you do that on your own and you'd be buying only one part vs a mount and a correction kit/bolt. The disadvantage of course is price as quality pieces aren't cheap.
 
0

02GTRX

I told an admin to shut up...now I live with the S
20+ Year Stangneter
Sep 27, 2004
213
8
19
Apr 24, 2009
#6
  • Apr 24, 2009
  • #6
No weight reduction..maybe the gt/cs rides alittle lower in the rear? That's about all I can think of...
Posted via Mobile Device
 

BCB00GT

Founding Member
Mar 5, 2002
420
0
17
Apr 24, 2009
#7
  • Apr 24, 2009
  • #7
Was it the blue springs or other Roush springs?
 
0

02GTRX

I told an admin to shut up...now I live with the S
20+ Year Stangneter
Sep 27, 2004
213
8
19
Apr 24, 2009
#8
  • Apr 24, 2009
  • #8
Blue springs
Posted via Mobile Device
 

ct07gt

Member
Feb 14, 2008
377
0
16
Apr 24, 2009
#9
  • Apr 24, 2009
  • #9
I installed the Roush suspension and have had no tire wear issues, the car has 13k miles on it with the current suspension. I have the shocks and struts too, but I don't think they would affect anything as far as tire wear. I did get an alignment after the install as a precaution, but it didn't really need any corrections.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

R
What's it Worth? 1997 Cobra, a ton of mods and restoration
  • riored97snake
  • Jun 18, 2026
  • What is it Worth?!?!?
Replies
2
Views
179
What is it Worth?!?!? Jun 21, 2026
riored97snake
R
SOLD SOLD!!!! 1993 Notchback Roadracer For Sale. She's a beast!
  • Boydster
  • Apr 25, 2025
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
0
Views
1K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Apr 25, 2025
Boydster
For Sale 94 Cobra 408w AOD Project For Sale
  • Labora
  • Oct 11, 2024
  • SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04)
Replies
1
Views
1K
SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04) Apr 7, 2025
Labora
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
46
Views
3K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jul 16, 2026
Noobz347
R
Is rear axle offset common with these cars?
  • Rembrant
  • Feb 17, 2024
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
1K
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Feb 18, 2024
Yel2002GTAuto
Y
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?