bobbys9350
New Member
- Mar 30, 2005
- 472
- 0
- 0

FordRacing302 said:I gaurantee that I didnt miscount,
You probably counted right but you didn't perform the test correctly.FordRacing302 said:This is exactly how I did it...I jacked up the rear end and taped a part of the wheel and a part of the fender parallel to each other, I was going to tape 1 side of the driveshaft but i found an unusual mark that I used for reference...I turned the driveshaft by hand 1 complete rotation while watching the wheel and by the time the DS had completed its rotation the tire was only 3 quarters the way around...
Now if there's an error in the way I checked it then tell me how to do it, so I can go check what the ratio really is

WHAT?!?!?Foxfan88 said:this is kind of off topic but did you ever notice all the 2.3 mustangs were giving the 3.73 rearend, they are so weak they cant use a a 2.73 rear.
imagine how slow a 2.3 would be with 2.73 O_O

Nutzy19 said:WHAT?!?!?
FoxFan is at it again.. 2.3's didnt come with 3.73's..... unless its a Thunderbird turbocoupe....![]()
Interesting... but as Foxfan said "all" 2.3 come with 3.73's....which they dont and never did.notchback said:my buddies old capri did....w/ the 2.3

Nutzy19 said:Interesting... but as Foxfan said "all" 2.3 come with 3.73's....which they dont and never did.![]()
