• Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-

HDR Images: Learn and share your work...

  • Thread starter Thread starter highvolts
  • Start date Start date Mar 12, 2008
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • …
  • 10
Next
First Prev 3 of 10 Next Last

Emay

Member
Oct 4, 2006
228
1
18
South Elgin, IL
Mar 17, 2008
#41
  • Mar 17, 2008
  • #41
Pliskin said:
That really doesnt look like HDR to me. I dont know much at all about it but I always thought it was supposed to look almost fake.
Click to expand...

Pliskin, grab this month issue of digital dark room, they discuss at length the varieties of HDR conversion and the mindset that can be had by any photographer's taste.

As dark said the real point of HDR is for the picture to have a High Dynamic Range, within shadows detail will pop, color pop is a huge asset, and small details normally not jumping out in a picture will.

That's what is considered normal HDR, now some use the feature as an artistic approach and make things "over cooked". It is in fact a personal preference, some pull off the over cook very well from an artistic stand point.
 

Emay

Member
Oct 4, 2006
228
1
18
South Elgin, IL
Mar 19, 2008
#42
  • Mar 19, 2008
  • #42
Here's a night time HDR image of 3 exposures. I only went + and - one stop via ISO 100 @f16 on a remote.

Photo bucket likes to resize a tad funny, So your not seeing near the quality of the original. However, you can see many details in this shot that normally would be swallowed in darkness. As mentioned by Darkfire previous, I like to shy away from over doing the HDR for a sense of detailed realism, not cartoonishover cooking of my shots..

Soon as the weather breaks, I'll have shots with the car in them instead of landscapes like this.. Just figured this could inspire..

View attachment 326083
 

highvolts

20+ Year Stangneter
Sep 1, 2003
436
2
18
Ohio
Mar 19, 2008
#43
  • Mar 19, 2008
  • #43
Emay said:
Here's a night time HDR image of 3 exposures. I only went + and - one stop via ISO 100 @f16 on a remote.

Photo bucket likes to resize a tad funny, So your not seeing near the quality of the original. However, you can see many details in this shot that normally would be swallowed in darkness. As mentioned by Darkfire previous, I like to shy away from over doing the HDR for a sense of detailed realism, not cartoonishover cooking of my shots..

Soon as the weather breaks, I'll have shots with the car in them instead of landscapes like this.. Just figured this could inspire..
Click to expand...

I like it! What software? I also like the realistic shots much better than the cartoonish.

-Jason
 

DarkFireGT

Playing with my wife's really makes me want one.
10 Year Member
May 23, 2004
692
10
89
East Moline, IL
Mar 19, 2008
#44
  • Mar 19, 2008
  • #44
Good job, EMay! Now that it's starting to get warmer out, I'll have to get some shots from a few neat places around here. Night shots and shooting towards the sun benefit most from HDR.
 

Emay

Member
Oct 4, 2006
228
1
18
South Elgin, IL
Mar 22, 2008
#45
  • Mar 22, 2008
  • #45
Testing flickr as host of an HDR resize, so bear with me here.. Let's see how she looks:

 

Towelly

New Member
May 9, 2006
174
0
0
Mar 27, 2008
#46
  • Mar 27, 2008
  • #46
DarkFireGT said:
Hey Towelly, is that accross from the bus depot in Davenport? Interesting photo spot.
Click to expand...

Yes sir it is. I thought it looked kind of neat. Next time I'm going to bring my tripod. I took those shots from the ground while propped up on my cell phone....
 

Emay

Member
Oct 4, 2006
228
1
18
South Elgin, IL
Apr 5, 2008
#47
  • Apr 5, 2008
  • #47
A slight overcook, subtle but pretty good in my eye..

 

kooldawg6

mine works really well and can take a fair amount
Aug 31, 2006
1,679
2
38
Central VA
Apr 6, 2008
#48
  • Apr 6, 2008
  • #48
Emay said:
A slight overcook, subtle but pretty good in my eye..
Click to expand...

Somebody get me a towel!!!!!

 

DarkFireGT

Playing with my wife's really makes me want one.
10 Year Member
May 23, 2004
692
10
89
East Moline, IL
Apr 6, 2008
#49
  • Apr 6, 2008
  • #49
Yeah, a little bit of haloing, but looks pretty darned good, EMay.
 
C

Capt. Simiain

New Member
May 28, 2007
3
0
0
Seattle Area
May 17, 2008
#50
  • May 17, 2008
  • #50
First HDR Attempt

 

DarkFireGT

Playing with my wife's really makes me want one.
10 Year Member
May 23, 2004
692
10
89
East Moline, IL
May 18, 2008
#51
  • May 18, 2008
  • #51
Not a bad first attempt. It's a bit dark, but overall good.
 

highvolts

20+ Year Stangneter
Sep 1, 2003
436
2
18
Ohio
May 19, 2008
#52
  • May 19, 2008
  • #52
Love the car! Its a little dark, like DF said, and one other thing was that the background was too busy (Power Lines, Street Lights, etc...) With all that said, I still like it! How many pictures did you take?
 
C

Capt. Simiain

New Member
May 28, 2007
3
0
0
Seattle Area
May 19, 2008
#53
  • May 19, 2008
  • #53
highvolts said:
Love the car! Its a little dark, like DF said, and one other thing was that the background was too busy (Power Lines, Street Lights, etc...) With all that said, I still like it! How many pictures did you take?
Click to expand...

Not enough pictures (thats the best set). I do need to find some better scenery, which will be easier in the coming months now that our rainy season should be ending soon
 

Pook

New Member
Apr 12, 2007
9
0
0
Blackpool UK
Aug 10, 2008
#54
  • Aug 10, 2008
  • #54
Interesting thread this for me as a Photogapher. Some good advice already posted here so no need to repeat anything, just remember a few things:

HDR, or ANY effect applied post-production will not make up for a poor photo... either technically, or compositionally. It's meant to enhance only.

Second: Tonemapping. Don't go over the top. The point of HDR is not to create wacky special effects, and when you do, it just looks like you've run it through a Photoshop filter, and looks cheesy. The point of HDR is to keep detail in shadows as well as highlights... simple as that. While a slight overcook in tone mapping can look good, remember.... less is more.

Don't get too caught up in the whole HDR thing.. HDR is something that you can do to photo that's already great, but it won't rescue a poor one. Take the time to look around the viewfinder first... watch for the pitfalls such as power lines, trees out of people's heads, or in this case, car roofs etc. Think about where you place the car in the frame: Don't just stand there and take it from your eye point, as usually, it's a crap place to be to take a photo. Think of getting low, or high, or maybe place the car in an unusual place within the frame. Don't just put things in boxes from your normal standing eye level.

A tutorial on photography is way beyond this thread... but Google is your friend


Some HDR stuff of my Mustang.













Another thing to rememebr, is that HFR workds best when using more than one exposure, rather than trying to create a HDR set from one. Use a tripod... take a range of shots starting around 2 stops under exposed, then 1 stop under, one dead on, one 1 stop over, then finally 2 stops over. Use those 5 to create a HDR image, then tone map it so it doesn't scream "HDR" at the top of it's voice

I use Photomatix. Not found anything to beat it so far.
 

DarkFireGT

Playing with my wife's really makes me want one.
10 Year Member
May 23, 2004
692
10
89
East Moline, IL
Aug 10, 2008
#55
  • Aug 10, 2008
  • #55
Nice work. I don't care for Photomatix because the results generally come out grainy, and the whole point to digital photography, to me, is having crisp large res images.

I completely agree with overcooking. There's a time and place for it, though. Pictures of rusting junk looks great when you turn up the juice. But at that point it's more art, and less representation of real life. I also agree that HDR can't save an image, only enhance it. I never fake HDR. I've tried tone-mapping a RAW. It just doesn't "do it" for me.

Mine are even less cooked than yours heh.






 

Pook

New Member
Apr 12, 2007
9
0
0
Blackpool UK
Aug 10, 2008
#56
  • Aug 10, 2008
  • #56
You using Dynamic Photo HDR? I find the interface too simplistic, and it doesn't give me enough control. Never tried artizan, or whatever it's called, so I may give it a whirl.

Photomatix can produce noise free images if you have good quality RAWS. You really need to feed it 5 seperate exposures tho, not adjusted images from one exposure.
 

DarkFireGT

Playing with my wife's really makes me want one.
10 Year Member
May 23, 2004
692
10
89
East Moline, IL
Aug 10, 2008
#57
  • Aug 10, 2008
  • #57
Yeah, for the most part I used DPHDR. Sometimes I go back to Artizen. Every once in a while, I try Photomatix, but usually am not happy with the results. What I really like about the latest version of DPHDR is the curves and light masking features. They make a huge difference in producing realistic results. When I'm doing HDRs of cars, all I'm really trying to do is keep the details, like tire tread and grill features. So the light masking helps in keeping it from getting over cooked.
 

GreyDiesel

New Member
Jul 26, 2008
167
1
0
Denver, CO
Aug 12, 2008
#58
  • Aug 12, 2008
  • #58
Great shots Pook. I love that you placed the car infront of the storm cloud. That was good thinking for later HDR processing.

Here is my recent photo. I am looking forward to waxing and polishing the car and going out for a real photo shoot. This was just taken in a brief moment while driving to a wedding.

 

DarkFireGT

Playing with my wife's really makes me want one.
10 Year Member
May 23, 2004
692
10
89
East Moline, IL
Aug 12, 2008
#59
  • Aug 12, 2008
  • #59
I normally don't like the overcooked ones, but that looks pretty good.
 

DarkFireGT

Playing with my wife's really makes me want one.
10 Year Member
May 23, 2004
692
10
89
East Moline, IL
Aug 12, 2008
#60
  • Aug 12, 2008
  • #60
Went back and overcooked one with Photomatix for the heck of it.

 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • …
  • 10
Next
First Prev 3 of 10 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
46
Views
2K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Thursday at 9:44 PM
Noobz347
  • Poll Poll
Fox Foxtoberfest 2025: Registration open!
  • FastDriver
  • Oct 31, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 4 5 6
Replies
116
Views
8K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Nov 13, 2025
TripleYellow
Next Generation LED Technology - Meet the SL2 Pro LED Bulb | Diode Dynamics
  • Diode Dynamics
  • Mar 22, 2024
  • Vendor Sponsor Forums
Replies
1
Views
828
Vendor Sponsor Forums Apr 11, 2024
Diode Dynamics
Introducing the All-New SL2 LED Replacement Bulb | Diode Dynamics
  • Diode Dynamics
  • Mar 21, 2024
  • Vendor Sponsor Forums
Replies
0
Views
635
Vendor Sponsor Forums Mar 21, 2024
Diode Dynamics
Foxtoberfest 2022
  • FastDriver
  • Sep 6, 2022
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
31
Views
8K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 31, 2022
Ford Moore
F
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?