• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Head & Cam question

  • Thread starter Thread starter tvanlant
  • Start date Start date Oct 26, 2005
T

tvanlant

New Member
May 17, 2005
8
0
1
Lake of the Ozarks, MO
Oct 26, 2005
#1
  • Oct 26, 2005
  • #1
I have a 92 GT and am looking to run mid 12s. I currently run 13.2s at 104 with this setup:

306 ci
Forged Speed Pro Pistons w/ 4 valve reliefs
GT40 Intake
75mm MAS and throttle body
30lb injectors
Shorty headers

I was thinking about AFR 165s and F303 cam. Any suggestions? Will that setup clear my pistons? Any other advice? It is my daily driver, so nothing too wild.
 

69Rcode_Mach1

Active Member
Apr 20, 2004
1,473
1
37
Salt Lake City, Utah
Oct 26, 2005
#2
  • Oct 26, 2005
  • #2
I don't know specifically what will clear or not. AFR's are always a good choice though. No matter what you will need to check your clearances with the pistons. The clay method has always worked fine for me. You can't just chance your whole combo on laziness.
 
T

tvanlant

New Member
May 17, 2005
8
0
1
Lake of the Ozarks, MO
Oct 27, 2005
#3
  • Oct 27, 2005
  • #3
any other opinions?
 
3

304billet

Member
Sep 16, 2005
315
1
16
Oct 27, 2005
#4
  • Oct 27, 2005
  • #4
The AFR 165 or 185's will both clear w/ aftermarket pistons. Ur pistons come with with 2 valve reliefs on each piston, not 4. One for an inline ford head and one for TW heads. I would suggest the 185's w/ Comp cam XE282HR, LT heades, Performer ll intake port matched to heads. the rest is fine.
 

BlownFiveLiter

have car, will race....wait, it doesn't run
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
3,133
18
108
Chicagoland
Oct 27, 2005
#5
  • Oct 27, 2005
  • #5
304billet said:
Ur pistons come with with 2 valve reliefs on each piston, not 4.
Click to expand...
*BUZZ* Wrong answer. Federal Mogul's website actually shows a pic of one of their Speed Pro engine kits, with 4 reliefs on each piston, allowing them to be installed either way.



You should always check piston to valve clearance when installing a new cam, to ensure you won't run into problems, IMO. You could be in the high 12's with the current trap speed you have. Is that with stock heads?
 
B

blackice

New Member
Sep 23, 2005
17
0
0
CT
Oct 27, 2005
#6
  • Oct 27, 2005
  • #6
I think the setup you have now is capable of coming close to what you want. I think the right cam , gears and tires and injectors, ( I think 30lbs are to big for your combo ) 24s would be better , and a good duno tune will put you easy into the mid 12s
 

BlownFiveLiter

have car, will race....wait, it doesn't run
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
3,133
18
108
Chicagoland
Oct 27, 2005
#7
  • Oct 27, 2005
  • #7
We don't know what his combo is, as far as heads. I'd stick with the 30's, because adding the AFR's will immediately increase your fuel demands. BTW, I've been looking for my old timeslip from when I had my Fox, but if I remember correctly, I went 12.83 @ 104, so you're in 12 second territory as your car sits.
 

Modular2v

Founding Member
Jun 30, 2002
3,222
23
99
oklahoma
Oct 27, 2005
#8
  • Oct 27, 2005
  • #8
if you are trapping at 104...you might want to think about some control arms or subframe connectors to get you 12s
 

Luvmy88

New Member
Oct 27, 2003
136
0
0
Oct 27, 2005
#9
  • Oct 27, 2005
  • #9
more gear.
 
T

tvanlant

New Member
May 17, 2005
8
0
1
Lake of the Ozarks, MO
Oct 27, 2005
#10
  • Oct 27, 2005
  • #10
Sorry, I didn't mention I already have this:

3.73s
Tremec TKO 500
Moderately ported iron heads
Close to stock cam
Subframes

I would like to keep using my intake and shorty headers.

With that said, how about that AFR 165s or 185s? Which cam, the f303, e303, or that comp cam?
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Oct 28, 2005
#11
  • Oct 28, 2005
  • #11
Get AFR 165's, dump the 30lber's for 24's.

I believe the speed pros are stock valve relief size if not a bit bigger. There would be a good chance still that the AFR 185 2.02 valve size would still contact or become close to hitting the piston.

Good Luck!
 
I

IntenseBlue

Member
Jul 10, 2005
946
0
16
Oct 29, 2005
#12
  • Oct 29, 2005
  • #12
I think it sounds good.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Gt40 e303 combo questions
  • 99mustanggt2018
  • Mar 30, 2025
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
2
Views
449
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Mar 30, 2025
KRUISR
Progress Thread Heads/cam decision
  • RileyDymond
  • Oct 26, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
294
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 27, 2024
rednotch
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
954
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
Engine Head/Cam Recommendations
  • CWSpartan
  • May 29, 2024
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
1
Views
738
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech May 31, 2024
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?