• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

head swap worth it or not????

  • Thread starter Thread starter superstocker85
  • Start date Start date Sep 7, 2004
S

superstocker85

New Member
Sep 7, 2004
15
0
0
toledo ohio
Sep 7, 2004
#1
  • Sep 7, 2004
  • #1
I just recently purchased my 85GT from my father after totaling my 90GT. The car has 45,000 original miles and is the cleanest mustang I have ever saw. My question is would it be worth it to swap the heads off my 90 on to the 85. The heads on the 90 have minimum work done to them, just the thermactor bumps ground out and some trickflow springs and milled .012. I know the chambers are smaller and this was the reason the 87 and later had more compression than the 85 but is it worth the time and effort. My car has bbk headers and the usual exhaust (h-pipe, flows), it also has a 650 holley, 3.73's, and a whole list of the basic suspension parts and other small bolt ons. I am going to need to put new springs on the 85 heads any how and was wondering if there would be a noticable performance gain with the E7' heads.
 

giddyup306

Founding Member
Oct 22, 2002
3,041
2
59
Sep 7, 2004
#2
  • Sep 7, 2004
  • #2
I'd go with some aftermarket heads or thumpers if I were to go through all that work.
 
S

superstocker85

New Member
Sep 7, 2004
15
0
0
toledo ohio
Sep 7, 2004
#3
  • Sep 7, 2004
  • #3
Its really not that much work, plus these heads won't cost me anything. Also i would like to keep stock heads on the car because I want to see how fast i can go with the stock head and cam combo (hopefully mid 13's). plus this is an 85 GT and I don't want to start going radical for the sake of the car! Is there a difference between the 85 and 87-92 cams??
 

Killer50stang

New Member
May 11, 2004
632
0
0
Sep 7, 2004
#4
  • Sep 7, 2004
  • #4
superstocker85 said:
Its really not that much work, plus these heads won't cost me anything. Also i would like to keep stock heads on the car because I want to see how fast i can go with the stock head and cam combo (hopefully mid 13's). plus this is an 85 GT and I don't want to start going radical for the sake of the car! Is there a difference between the 85 and 87-92 cams??
Click to expand...

Yes, you need to be careful when getting a cam. The 87-93 are Roller Motors and the clearance is different. Just make sure you tell whoever you purchase the cam from what year your car is. I had a problem with pushrods when summit sent me pushrods for a 79-86 stang and it came out very bad causing lots of damage because of the clearance. Anyway, don't waste your time switching those heads, you're not gonna notice if any difference. Save your time and money and get some good Alum heads! I'm running Edlebrock Performers, they rock!
 

dreddstang

Founding Member
Aug 26, 2002
1,816
2
38
Waldorf, MD
Sep 7, 2004
#5
  • Sep 7, 2004
  • #5
I love the '85's! My second car was a black '85 T-top 5 speed!

Yeah, you may see a TINY bit of gain in that swap, but only that. The difference is going to be negligable. It would not be worth what you'd spend in time, effort, headbolts, and gaskets.

I had stock ported E-7's on my car for a while, it ran great! Have Twisted Wedge heads now and it's sooooo much better! As far as the thumper heads, I only know one person with that head/ intake combo, and they are not happy. This is not saying they are not a good part, there could be somthing else wrong with his motor, it's just that on the only car I have seen with that combo, he is putting like 215 to the wheels after spending his $$.

Get some aftermarket aluminum heads, if you really want to spend the time changing them. You can always keep your stock heads on the shelf if you ever want to put them back on so the car's correct!

I also agree with that you need to be careful picking a cam. Especially if you are changing heads, you have to make sure you have the right p to v clearance. I think the '85's were roller motors though, but pushrod length and p2v are always an issue when changing things around like that. Good luck, let us know what you decide on!
 

04sleeper

Founding Member
Jun 22, 2002
2,674
14
89
Dallas, TX
Sep 7, 2004
#6
  • Sep 7, 2004
  • #6
Killer50stang said:
Yes, you need to be careful when getting a cam. The 87-93 are Roller Motors and the clearance is different. Just make sure you tell whoever you purchase the cam from what year your car is. I had a problem with pushrods when summit sent me pushrods for a 79-86 stang and it came out very bad causing lots of damage because of the clearance. Anyway, don't waste your time switching those heads, you're not gonna notice if any difference. Save your time and money and get some good Alum heads! I'm running Edlebrock Performers, they rock!
Click to expand...
85's have roller moters. The pushrods are the same. 84's are the last year for non-roller cams.
I say switch them and you will definatly get more power fom them. Especially having the exaust bumps ground down and all.
 

moonenn3186

Founding Member
Jan 9, 2002
233
0
0
Dubuque, Iowa
Sep 7, 2004
#7
  • Sep 7, 2004
  • #7
Just to make sure everyone is clear here:

Not all 85's were roller engines. Only the GT's had them, and then only if it was a factory 5 speed, 4v Holley car. You will find out by pulling the intake for the head swap. As far as a performance gain with E7's . . . you would probably never notice. Otherwise the pushrods should be very close to the same length . . . you may want to check if you do it - since your heads were milled down. . . If you got some extra time, and some extra gaskets . . .go for it and let us know!
 
S

superstocker85

New Member
Sep 7, 2004
15
0
0
toledo ohio
Sep 7, 2004
#8
  • Sep 7, 2004
  • #8
the car is an original holley 4 barrel car and it is the first year for the roller cam and the pushrods are the same length as the 87-92 motors. What valve springs should I install on the stock cam to get some more RPM's out of her?? Because both heads need new springs, because the ones on the E7's were the trick flow upgrade springs with 110#'s of closed seat pressure and I don't know if those were meant for roller cams. They did work decent on my 90 GT so I don't know?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
835
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
5
What's it Worth? 1990 Notchback 5.0
  • 50notch90
  • Apr 14, 2024
  • What is it Worth?!?!?
Replies
4
Views
2K
What is it Worth?!?!? Apr 23, 2024
50notch90
5
For Sale 94 Cobra 408w AOD Project For Sale
  • Labora
  • Oct 11, 2024
  • SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04)
Replies
1
Views
1K
SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04) Apr 7, 2025
Labora
SOLD SOLD!!!! 1993 Notchback Roadracer For Sale. She's a beast!
  • Boydster
  • Apr 25, 2025
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
0
Views
1K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Apr 25, 2025
Boydster
Drivetrain Help with Check Engine Light after Transmission Swap - 1990 Mustang LX 5.0
  • jglass3
  • Oct 12, 2020
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 5 6 7
Replies
121
Views
15K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 15, 2020
jglass3
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?