• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Head Unit wire harness madness

  • Thread starter Thread starter jims2321
  • Start date Start date Sep 18, 2010
J

jims2321

Founding Member
Dec 12, 2001
93
0
6
Oviedo, FL
Sep 18, 2010
#1
  • Sep 18, 2010
  • #1
As I continue to restore my mustang I decided to upgrade the stock audio. A quick surf to Crutchfield and I got the basics for a decent sound upgrade:

JVC KD-HDR60 HD radio/CD player with USB and Aux jack
Kicker 08zx200.4 amp
2 pairs of Kenwood KFC-C6893PS for the front doors and the rear quarter panels.

Because I was replacing the stock amp, I decide to put the new amp in the trunk so, I wanted to run RCA back to the amp and then speaker wire out to the new speakers.

Big problem, the JVC only has 2 RCA channels for speakers and 1 for Subwoofer. A quick call to Crutchfield tech confirmed that if I was willing to sacrifice the ability to balance left to right, then I could just split the 2 RCA at the amp to feed all 4 speaker channels.

To Hell with that, some research turn up a neat little device called a High Signal to Low Signal Line-Out Converter. Basically it takes the speaker outputs from the HU, converts it to RCA line signal to send to the amp.

Now I had all the parts to send RCA signal to the amp, but one major problem lots and lots of splices needed to be made. Since I decide I was going the converter route, I also decide use the existing power connections from the old HU to provide the necessary ground, power and control.

As I started to assemble the wire harness, my lovely wife mentions that I needed to run a control wire from the HU to the amp to control turning it on (damn I hate when she is right! ). So I grab the control wire from the amp installation pack and add it to my harness.

As I am about to start soldering and testing the harness. I get flashes of snagged and nicked wires behind the HU, so I dressed up the harness to miniumize the possibility and the end result is below

The entire harness


Close up of the new HU connector side

The Power connector side
 

newskool

Active Member
Oct 17, 2006
251
37
48
Fayetteville, NC
Sep 18, 2010
#2
  • Sep 18, 2010
  • #2
looking good
 

Zero Signal

Active Member
Feb 24, 2003
2,633
2
46
Tucson, AZ
Sep 19, 2010
#3
  • Sep 19, 2010
  • #3
You're brave. I ditched the entire stereo harness and amps and rewired the entire thing. So much easier than trying to figure out the factory mess.
 

earleys94gt

Active Member
Aug 31, 2003
1,223
16
49
Ashley, Ohio
Sep 19, 2010
#4
  • Sep 19, 2010
  • #4
I feel like a just read a module for an Electrical Engineering major, j/k.

Work looks good.
 

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,302
1,645
214
Acworth, GA
Sep 19, 2010
#5
  • Sep 19, 2010
  • #5
I used one of those thingies about 15 years ago on my MR2. It was the same thing, but it was called a PAC. Can't for the life of me what it stands for though. Had 2 amps and 22 speakers on my MR2 all running off the stock head unit.

Kurt
 

MysteryMachine

Active Member
Jun 21, 2003
1,835
2
39
Parkesburg, PA
Sep 19, 2010
#6
  • Sep 19, 2010
  • #6
22 speakers? good lord where did you fit them all?
 

Adam95GT

New Member
Aug 14, 2006
2,564
3
0
Burlington, NJ
Sep 19, 2010
#7
  • Sep 19, 2010
  • #7
MysteryMachine said:
22 speakers? good lord where did you fit them all?
Click to expand...

Under the hood Da Dun Tis.
 

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,302
1,645
214
Acworth, GA
Sep 20, 2010
#8
  • Sep 20, 2010
  • #8
MysteryMachine said:
22 speakers? good lord where did you fit them all?
Click to expand...

Dude, I was in high school, and I don't know what we were thinking. This is the car that was originally my older brother's that somehow I ended up with. If you have ever seen the inside of an MR2, you'd understand though. There is no room for anything. It was all small speakers tucked into every corner of the interior. There was no room for subs anywhere, and it's pointless to put them in the trunk, because that's behind the engine. We had these things called Aurora base shakers bolted to the floor under the seats. Basically just the magnet with no cone.

I know I miss that car a lot though. It was unbelievably comfortable, and holy **** fast.

Kurt
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

S
Stereo snakes nest; what am I missing?
  • Scott_S
  • Aug 29, 2025
  • Mustang Sound & Shine All
Replies
3
Views
373
Mustang Sound & Shine All Sep 24, 2025
Scott_S
S
Resolved Holley terminator integration into CCRM
  • BrandonMP
  • Feb 25, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
1
Views
274
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Feb 27, 2026
BrandonMP
F
Electrical From scratch: alternator wiring
  • fox racer v2
  • Jun 23, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
0
Views
583
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jun 23, 2025
fox racer v2
F
Run a 5 channel or use head unit and mono amp for sub?
  • 2000xp8
  • Sep 20, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 23, 2024
2000xp8
1999 Mustang GT - No Start- Need help understanding the fuel pump circuit and how it works
  • 99gtGuy
  • Nov 4, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
536
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Nov 7, 2025
04newedge-
0
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?