• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

HEADERS

  • Thread starter Thread starter 6FIVE_STANG
  • Start date Start date Jul 6, 2006
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
1 of 3 Next Last

6FIVE_STANG

New Member
Jul 2, 2006
142
0
0
San Jose, CA
Jul 6, 2006
#1
  • Jul 6, 2006
  • #1
I WANT TO START MODDING MY 289 AND I THINK IM GOING TO START BY GETTING A SET OF GOOD HEADERS. I DONT WANT TO SPEND A FORTUNE, BUT I DO WANT GOOD QUALITY/HP. SO WHAT LONG TUBE CERAMIC HEADERS DO YOU GUYS SUGGEST I GET ...THANKZ

-these are the ones i've been lookin' at lately.

http://store.summitracing.com/partd...923429+4294839039+4294840071+115&autoview=sku
http://store.summitracing.com/partd...923429+4294839039+4294840071+115&autoview=sku
http://store.summitracing.com/partd...923429+4294839039+4294840071+115&autoview=sku
http://store.summitracing.com/partd...923429+4294839039+4294840071+115&autoview=sku
http://store.summitracing.com/partd...923429+4294839039+4294840071+115&autoview=sku
 

Cobain03

Active Member
Aug 27, 2003
996
0
36
Lexington, Ky
Jul 6, 2006
#2
  • Jul 6, 2006
  • #2
stay away from patriot long tubes what ever you do. theres about 20 threads here about them hitting the fenderwell.
 

6FIVE_STANG

New Member
Jul 2, 2006
142
0
0
San Jose, CA
Jul 6, 2006
#3
  • Jul 6, 2006
  • #3
ok so what should i go with?...
 

XXBULLETSXX

New Member
Mar 30, 2005
301
0
0
Kannapolis, NC
Jul 6, 2006
#4
  • Jul 6, 2006
  • #4
I just put on a set of patriot headers with no problems. Maybe I got lucky? Wish I would have known about the previous problems everyone else had. Glad mine worked out ok. I got them from CJ Pony Parts if that matters.

Good luck with your choice!
 

6FIVE_STANG

New Member
Jul 2, 2006
142
0
0
San Jose, CA
Jul 6, 2006
#5
  • Jul 6, 2006
  • #5
anyone else?...
 

65notch

New Member
Jun 18, 2005
303
1
0
661 Cali
Jul 6, 2006
#6
  • Jul 6, 2006
  • #6
im currently running the patriot t-y's, there ugly, not the prettiest welds but i wrapped em(since they are cheap headers, would have jet hotted if they were worth it) in some fiber wrap so they look decent now. no problem with clearances or fit.

i had hooker comp long tubes prior to the patriots, they worked great, wernt to expensive either. i had to take them off when i did the t5 swap thou.
 
P

Protowrxs

Member
Jul 20, 2005
93
0
6
Oklahoma
Jul 6, 2006
#7
  • Jul 6, 2006
  • #7
65notch said:
i had hooker comp long tubes prior to the patriots, they worked great, wernt to expensive either. i had to take them off when i did the t5 swap thou.
Click to expand...

Really? What was the issue? Clutch linkage/cable??

I had hoped to keep my old long tubes on a '69 with a 302/T5 or 3550.

-Stephen
 

67topless

Member
Mar 31, 2006
203
0
16
Raleigh, NC
Jul 7, 2006
#8
  • Jul 7, 2006
  • #8
I have the Hooker Comp ceramic coated headers... look great and I've had no problems. However, I am still set up with the stock 4 sp toploader and mechanical clutch. Was hoping to do a T5 swap soon and new I would have issues.... but didn't think I would have to dump my headers.

Scott
 

65notch

New Member
Jun 18, 2005
303
1
0
661 Cali
Jul 7, 2006
#9
  • Jul 7, 2006
  • #9
the problem with the hooker comps...since all 4 tubes are single untill the collector, they dont leave any clearance for the clutch cable(mechanical linkage may be different, im not sure) i ordered my t5 kit from Modern Driveline and they had mentioned the i may have header problems, but i tired the hookers anyways...they were a no-go. so i called up Modern driveline and they suggested a cpl different headers i could go with. they either needed to be shorties or tri-ys. since most shorters are pricey and require differnt motor mounts, and huge modification of exhaust(long tubes to shorties) it was easier to go with tri-ys. the helped alot. but i still had issues...the cable hole on the bellhousing is almost directly inline with the header so i had to make a harness to pull the cable to on side so she wouldnt melt on the header.
i read up on header mods a while back, and there are some people on the forums that got creative with their long tubes, such as cutting out one of the tubes(#7 maybe?) and rewelding it to create a gap for the cable. it was an idea but i didnt want to mess with headers that have already been made a certian way for a reason.
hope all this rambling made since...
 

67topless

Member
Mar 31, 2006
203
0
16
Raleigh, NC
Jul 7, 2006
#10
  • Jul 7, 2006
  • #10
65notch said:
the problem with the hooker comps...since all 4 tubes are single untill the collector, they dont leave any clearance for the clutch cable(mechanical linkage may be different, im not sure) i ordered my t5 kit from Modern Driveline and they had mentioned the i may have header problems, but i tired the hookers anyways...they were a no-go. so i called up Modern driveline and they suggested a cpl different headers i could go with. they either needed to be shorties or tri-ys. since most shorters are pricey and require differnt motor mounts, and huge modification of exhaust(long tubes to shorties) it was easier to go with tri-ys. the helped alot. but i still had issues...the cable hole on the bellhousing is almost directly inline with the header so i had to make a harness to pull the cable to on side so she wouldnt melt on the header.
i read up on header mods a while back, and there are some people on the forums that got creative with their long tubes, such as cutting out one of the tubes(#7 maybe?) and rewelding it to create a gap for the cable. it was an idea but i didnt want to mess with headers that have already been made a certian way for a reason.
hope all this rambling made since...
Click to expand...

I guess I could always lay down the extra dough for a hydraulic setup correct (like money is growing on trees these days)?

Anyway... sorry for hijacking the thread.

Scott
 

302 coupe

Founding Member
Mar 2, 2000
1,952
3
36
Macon, Ga.
Jul 7, 2006
#11
  • Jul 7, 2006
  • #11
I really like my ceramic coated Hooker comps. I was running tri-ys before and thought they were ok, then when I put on the hookers I was surprised at how much better it ran. I'll never run tri-y's again. Hooker quality is good, they look and sound great. They hang a little low, but not too bad, my car sits kinda low and I don't have any problems unless I carelessly go flying over a big speedbump. I'll post a pic when I get home to give you an idea of how they sit in relation to the frame rails.
 

302 coupe

Founding Member
Mar 2, 2000
1,952
3
36
Macon, Ga.
Jul 7, 2006
#12
  • Jul 7, 2006
  • #12
 

Attachments

  • test020.webp
    42.7 KB · Views: 78

6FIVE_STANG

New Member
Jul 2, 2006
142
0
0
San Jose, CA
Jul 8, 2006
#13
  • Jul 8, 2006
  • #13
YEAH, HOSE COMPS DO SIT KINDA LOW. DO THE SUPER COMPS SIT THAT LOW ASWELL?... WHAT OTHER HEADERS DO YOU GUYS USE...
 
D

davishokies

20+ Year Stangneter
Jul 27, 2004
20
0
1
Stafford, VA
Jul 8, 2006
#14
  • Jul 8, 2006
  • #14
I have Patriot ceramic Tri-Ys and they have been great. A lot of low end torque and no fitment problems.
 

xoxbxfx

Founding Member
May 9, 2001
3,959
0
0
Southlake, TX
Jul 8, 2006
#15
  • Jul 8, 2006
  • #15
all long tubes are gonna hang low..there just isnt a ton of space and you have to clear the trans crossmemeber, the collector is big, so the outlet has to be low.

I like Hooker Comps and SuperComps...never had a problem with them and they have been good quality
 

6FIVE_STANG

New Member
Jul 2, 2006
142
0
0
San Jose, CA
Jul 9, 2006
#16
  • Jul 9, 2006
  • #16
what do you guys think of these...
http://store.summitracing.com/partd...923429+4294840071+4294839039+115&autoview=sku

i dont know what to get . i dont want to spend more than $350. (HELP)
 

6FIVE_STANG

New Member
Jul 2, 2006
142
0
0
San Jose, CA
Jul 9, 2006
#17
  • Jul 9, 2006
  • #17
what do you guys think of these...
http://store.summitracing.com/partd...923429+4294840071+4294839039+115&autoview=sku

i dont know what to get . i dont want to spend more than $350. (HELP)
 

6FIVE_STANG

New Member
Jul 2, 2006
142
0
0
San Jose, CA
Jul 9, 2006
#18
  • Jul 9, 2006
  • #18
what do you guys think of these...
http://store.summitracing.com/partd...923429+4294840071+4294839039+115&autoview=sku

i dont know what to get . i dont want to spend more than $350. (HELP)
 

6FIVE_STANG

New Member
Jul 2, 2006
142
0
0
San Jose, CA
Jul 9, 2006
#19
  • Jul 9, 2006
  • #19
what do you guys think of these...
http://store.summitracing.com/partd...923429+4294840071+4294839039+115&autoview=sku

i dont know what to get . i dont want to spend more than $350. (HELP)
 

ddonaca351

Active Member
Dec 1, 2002
2,055
1
48
Camas Washington
Jul 9, 2006
#20
  • Jul 9, 2006
  • #20
302 coupe said:
Click to expand...

Notice how every time you come off a speed bump its going to smash the bottom tubes flat... (ala camaro)

(imho) Get a good set of 1&5/8 UNequal ceramic shortie headers (like the 5.0s use) They make good power, dont drag the ground, leave more room for trans/clutck linkage and lines, steering linkage, sfi bellhousing, etc... etc.... etc....

EDIT: Try search on summit for - SUM-G9070 that should help ya out... then tell the sales guy you want a set of clamps/reducers to mate them to 2.5" pipe. Armed with your box (when it arives) take a trip to your local exhaust shop (hopefully a good one) and in about 2-3 hrs you should be rollin'....
OOOORRRR you can do it yourself if you can weld.

Dave-
 

Attachments

  • test020.webp
    42.7 KB · Views: 105
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
1 of 3 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

  • Locked
94-95 AEM EMS 30-1401
  • 4Jenna
  • Aug 30, 2010
  • Engine and Power Adder Parts
Replies
1
Views
3K
Engine and Power Adder Parts Jul 1, 2011
eparent
E
Would this mid pipe fit?
  • 9646gt
  • Apr 21, 2009
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
869
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Apr 21, 2009
9646gt
What do you know about this Summit X-pipe?
  • Husky44
  • Mar 26, 2009
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
12
Views
2K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Mar 31, 2009
ProKiller
S
Cable Clutch
  • sj9ers
  • May 11, 2009
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
12
Views
3K
Classic Mustang Specific Tech May 20, 2009
golf4283
Looking for opinions on headers...
  • GTA_V6_Mustang
  • Apr 20, 2008
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 24, 2008
GTA_V6_Mustang
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?