• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

heads and cam question on 95 cobra

  • Thread starter Thread starter hiimt0ny
  • Start date Start date Dec 29, 2005
H

hiimt0ny

New Member
Dec 29, 2005
13
0
1
Dec 29, 2005
#1
  • Dec 29, 2005
  • #1
i want tfs twisted wedge heads and stage 1 cam what will i need for the installation. should i get the heads with o rings or without and should i get the heads with 1.470" springs or 1.460" springs?

will i need to buy valve spings or lifters when installing the cam?
i beleive the 95 cobras come with 1.7 rr stock, can i still use the tfs cam with those rr's?
 
0

01SN8K

New Member
Jun 9, 2004
135
0
0
Dec 29, 2005
#2
  • Dec 29, 2005
  • #2
you wont need the o rings. check the specs on those springs. you will need one with atleast .550 lift. with 1.7 rockers that stage one cam will be about .530 intake lift and .541 exhaust lift. and i would replace the lifters at the same time too
 
H

hiimt0ny

New Member
Dec 29, 2005
13
0
1
Dec 29, 2005
#3
  • Dec 29, 2005
  • #3
but can i use the heads with o rings anyways?
 

CManT1914

New Member
Feb 5, 2004
3,172
2
0
Killeen, Texas
Dec 29, 2005
#4
  • Dec 29, 2005
  • #4
You can use the heads with o-rings, they make it harder to blow a headgasket. But look at it this way, if something goes wrong, a headgasket is easier to replace than piston rings.

IIRC, the 1.6" springs are the dual spring setup, and can handle .600" of lift. You're gonna want the duel spring setup with that cam, not the single spring. Although the single spring is rated for .540" lift, it's better to have stiffer springs than absolutely neccessary to avoid valve float at high rpms.

It's a good idea to replace the lifters while you're in their, just for insurance, although it's not absolutely neccessary.

The valve springs come already installed on the heads.

I would suggest switching to some stud mount rockers, otherwise IIRC you'll need to buy a kit to convert those heads to accept your stock pedestal mount rockers (I think Cobra's are pedestal's right?). Either way, buy some new rockers, the stock ones are junk.

As for what else you'll need, you'll need bigger injectors, a bigger maf (calibrated for those injectors, unless you're gonna tune around that), a bigger fuel pump, and a variety of tools, like a torque wrench, feeler gauge, timing light, balancer puller, etc. etc.
 

legalize420

Active Member
May 21, 2005
1,541
1
37
South Florida
Dec 29, 2005
#5
  • Dec 29, 2005
  • #5
the tw's are stud mount right? you wont be able to use the rockers because they are ped mount. you can most likely get anywhere from $400-500 when you sell you stock heads and rockers.
 

legalize420

Active Member
May 21, 2005
1,541
1
37
South Florida
Dec 29, 2005
#6
  • Dec 29, 2005
  • #6
CManT1914 said:
(I think Cobra's are pedestal's right?). Either way, buy some new rockers, the stock ones are junk.
Click to expand...


yes ped mount, but why are they junk?
 

CManT1914

New Member
Feb 5, 2004
3,172
2
0
Killeen, Texas
Dec 29, 2005
#7
  • Dec 29, 2005
  • #7
legalize420gt95 said:
yes ped mount, but why are they junk?
Click to expand...

Speaking from mine and a few buddy's experience with stock rockers, they're weak, come loose quite easily, heavy (compared to some aftermarket ones), and a pain in the butt! to try and set the lash on (but all pedestal mounts are, not just OEM).
 

Redsnk95

Founding Member
Feb 3, 2002
2,243
1
0
Houston, TX
Dec 29, 2005
#8
  • Dec 29, 2005
  • #8
I see your problem you don't set lash on ped rockers....god forbid me making close to 600rwhp with ped rockers.

Troy
 

legalize420

Active Member
May 21, 2005
1,541
1
37
South Florida
Dec 29, 2005
#9
  • Dec 29, 2005
  • #9
CManT1914 said:
Speaking from mine and a few buddy's experience with stock rockers, they're weak, come loose quite easily, heavy (compared to some aftermarket ones), and a pain in the butt! to try and set the lash on (but all pedestal mounts are, not just OEM).
Click to expand...


are we talking about the same rockers. the crane 1.7rr that come stock on the cobras, not the stock 1.6 rockers on gt's. ped mount rockers you torque to spec, not set lash.
 
H

hiimt0ny

New Member
Dec 29, 2005
13
0
1
Dec 29, 2005
#10
  • Dec 29, 2005
  • #10
CManT1914 said:
You can use the heads with o-rings, they make it harder to blow a headgasket. But look at it this way, if something goes wrong, a headgasket is easier to replace than piston rings.
Click to expand...

so i should get the rings or no?
 

CManT1914

New Member
Feb 5, 2004
3,172
2
0
Killeen, Texas
Dec 29, 2005
#11
  • Dec 29, 2005
  • #11
Redsnk95 said:
I see your problem you don't set lash on ped rockers....god forbid me making close to 600rwhp with ped rockers.

Troy
Click to expand...

I'm not saying there's something wrong with them, I just prefer stud mount. To each his own!

legalize420gt95 said:
are we talking about the same rockers. the crane 1.7rr that come stock on the cobras, not the stock 1.6 rockers on gt's. ped mount rockers you torque to spec, not set lash.
Click to expand...

Hmmmmm........ maybe not then....

But on pedestal mount rockers, if they aren't adjusted right, don't you have to use shims? I don't like that.

hiimt0ny said:
so i should get the rings or no?
Click to expand...

Doesn't really matter. If you were boosted I'd say no, because you want the head gasket to pop before something else goes wrong. On an N/A application, head gaskets aren't as common a problem.

Somebody correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't the block need to have a groove cut into it to accept o-ring'ed heads?
 

18mustangs

New Member
Jun 8, 2005
533
1
0
Virginia Beach, VA
Dec 30, 2005
#12
  • Dec 30, 2005
  • #12
Redsnk95 said:
I see your problem you don't set lash on ped rockers....god forbid me making close to 600rwhp with ped rockers.

Troy
Click to expand...

I'm with you on pedestal, on a street\strip car they're fine and a lot less hassle than stud mount.
Tim
 

WhiteDevil

New Member
Feb 4, 2003
2,717
0
0
San Diego
Dec 30, 2005
#13
  • Dec 30, 2005
  • #13
For your application i dont really see a need for O-ringed heads.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Fox Xtremely high fuel consumption
  • PonyGTrider
  • Apr 11, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 9 10 11
Replies
213
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 9, 2026
PonyGTrider
Engine Forged flat top pistons from 5.0 fit a 351 build?
  • PonyGTrider
  • May 22, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
17
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 1, 2026
PonyGTrider
T
Resolved No run or idle
  • Thebluefox1
  • Oct 10, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
14
Views
519
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 25, 2025
DadLife0724
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
887
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
B
SN95 New Heads
  • Blakeknight
  • May 30, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
959
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 30, 2025
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?