• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Heads, Cam

  • Thread starter Thread starter keegan.martin
  • Start date Start date Sep 18, 2021
K

keegan.martin

Member
Aug 9, 2020
80
5
18
Blissfield, Michigan
Sep 18, 2021
#1
  • Sep 18, 2021
  • #1
I am wondering what heads would be best for a e303 cam or a TFS1 cam. My original thought was gt40 heads because cheap and easy, but I have a little more to spend now so I am trying to explore best options. End goal is 325-400 flywheel hp. Right now is bone stock, have a ADOE trans (auto) and 3.73 gears that still need to be put in. Budget would be $1.5-2k or lower of course.
 

General karthief

wonder how much it would cost to ship you a pair
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 25, 2016
27,938
10,578
203
polk county florida
Sep 18, 2021
#2
  • Sep 18, 2021
  • #2
Skip the E cam if you're still EFI (just my opinion) and look at the build as a whole (or a hole if you don't plan well) for those HP numbers you should use a better head than a gt40.
 
Reactions: 7991LXnSHO
K

keegan.martin

Member
Aug 9, 2020
80
5
18
Blissfield, Michigan
Sep 19, 2021
#3
  • Sep 19, 2021
  • #3
what
General karthief said:
Skip the E cam if you're still EFI (just my opinion) and look at the build as a whole (or a hole if you don't plan well) for those HP numbers you should use a better head than a gt40.
Click to expand...
heads do you recommend then, what then the TFS1 cam or a different one?
 

Potomus Pete

I'm still waiting for the fully nude shots
5 Year Member
Mar 7, 2019
3,308
1,223
153
Sarasota Florida
Sep 19, 2021
#4
  • Sep 19, 2021
  • #4
I recommend no cam. From what I'v read you will have less problems with idle in the future. A better street car with a mild set of heads, and you will save money. Then you won't have to take the front of your motor apart leading possible future issues. That's just my take on it if I was going to upgrade my own car.
 

General karthief

wonder how much it would cost to ship you a pair
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 25, 2016
27,938
10,578
203
polk county florida
Sep 19, 2021
#5
  • Sep 19, 2021
  • #5
The heads and cam are the two biggest factors in producing HP numbers but what will the car be used for? You got the trans to hold up to 400 hp? You're good with the auto and 373s.
Now you already asked a similar question here a couple weeks ago
https://www.stangnet.com/mustang-forums/threads/300-370-hp-budget-flywheel-hp.921872/
 

7991LXnSHO

wanna catch the space herp
10 Year Member
Sep 1, 2010
7,387
2,745
194
Kearney, NE
Sep 20, 2021
#6
  • Sep 20, 2021
  • #6
Added displacement will make that power goal easier to attain and to drive. 1.34 Hp/ci with natural induction is going to take a comprehensive build plan, and not Gt40 heads.
1.15 Hp/ci from a 347 is going to have a more useable torque band. But you still will need heads that flow enough, pistons that clear the big valve diameter and cam lift, and intake and exhaust that flow enough.

The General is right about the money hole/whole plan. ;-) do it right the first time.
 
Reactions: General karthief

marcelo

Active Member
Feb 25, 2018
215
48
38
Quepos, Costa Rica, Central America
Sep 20, 2021
#7
  • Sep 20, 2021
  • #7
Promaxx 9175 Heads ... Work just great ....I run a F cam ..Engine makes excellent power and torque....(ok its a 331cu)
 
Reactions: Potomus Pete

General karthief

wonder how much it would cost to ship you a pair
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 25, 2016
27,938
10,578
203
polk county florida
Sep 20, 2021
#8
  • Sep 20, 2021
  • #8
I agree with those two, not because I have vast experience but from knowing them here. Look, brand X made 275 to 325+ hp from 350 cubes with crappy exhaust manifolds. You take a 5.0 push rod engine and build it to 400 hp it can get a little rowdy, an auto can tone it down a little, as said, go big or go home.
Ok, that's not what was said, now what was implied was make a plan, be realistic about how the car will be driven and consider the total package.
Then stick a 671 blower on it with a couple carbs on top.
Who cares if you can't see past it, it looks cool.
 

7991LXnSHO

wanna catch the space herp
10 Year Member
Sep 1, 2010
7,387
2,745
194
Kearney, NE
Sep 21, 2021
#9
  • Sep 21, 2021
  • #9
Joking aside, the blower route, centrifugal or Roots, is a big part of the traditional way to get to the power level goal with Gt40 heads. The cool factor vs the surprise factor comes into play. Not that a 400 Hp 302 build will be subtle, but well tuned, it could be passed off as a regular 302 with Dronemasters.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Ford truck engine swap issues
  • keel
  • Jul 7, 2026
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
17
Views
298
Other Auto Tech Jul 13, 2026
General karthief
Engine Suggestions on an engine rebuild. Stock cam/GT40Ps or aftermarket on both for a fun weekend driver?
  • MadSquirrelTech
  • Apr 28, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
837
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 7, 2026
MadSquirrelTech
A
Discussion on mild budget build/ top end
  • Acesario
  • Feb 21, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
741
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 23, 2026
General karthief
351w turbo build.... Turbo guys teach me things...
  • Kid wita 5oh
  • Oct 22, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 23, 2025
General karthief
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
909
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?