• Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2010 - 2014 Specific Tech

HELP,,, 3.31,3.55 or 3.73 for 2011-5.0-GT?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Husker
  • Start date Start date May 22, 2010
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
H

Husker

New Member
Mar 30, 2010
9
0
0
May 22, 2010
#1
  • May 22, 2010
  • #1
I'm gonna order a 5.0, one of the option's are, rear differential, I'll be driving mostly in town, I don't know the proper gear to order.

Please give me reasons, or justification's, for any of the three ratios, or if anyone knows of a LINK to explanations or applications for choosing one gear over the other I'm open for a 101.

Also what are the other must have option's on the 5.0 (Is this the correct slang or is it GT?)

Husker
 
D

drewzx3

Active Member
Feb 7, 2004
411
1
28
Louisiana
May 22, 2010
#2
  • May 22, 2010
  • #2
3.73's is the only option ya need
 
S

StuckInNY

Member
Mar 23, 2010
32
0
6
NY
May 22, 2010
#3
  • May 22, 2010
  • #3
I went with 3.55's, only because I do a lot of highway mileage. I figured it was the middle of the road solution between mileage and performance. Future mods will help me not miss having 3.73's.
 

SpartaPerformance

10 Year Member
Nov 5, 2006
2,517
61
89
Long Island NY
May 22, 2010
#4
  • May 22, 2010
  • #4
3.73 no doubt. 6th gear in the manual is 0.65:1 so you should be around 1,900 RPM at 55mph.
 

csledd

Official Ovary Punching Member
Founding Member
Aug 18, 2001
1,115
1
0
Paducah, KY
May 23, 2010
#5
  • May 23, 2010
  • #5
Agreed, 3.73's sound like a great idea.

Really I can't think of any other must have mods.. but the Brembo brake package is sexah. personally I like having the side scoops, hood scoop, and the windows louvers.
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
May 23, 2010
#6
  • May 23, 2010
  • #6
I'd have to see the torque curve on the new 5.0L, but my ballpark guess might be 3.55's. I had 3.27's in my Cougar when it was stock. After adding the blower, I stuck with them for a while, but often wondered that if 3.27's were good, then 3.73's must be better. I gave in and swapped them out and to be honest...hated it. My mileage only suffered slightly, but just driving around town was cumbersome. Short gear changes, shifts were in all the wrong places (automatic) and I wasn't crazy about running over 2,000RPM on the highway.

Swapped back to 3.27's and don't regret it a bit. The funniest part is that it made no difference what so ever in the track times. If anything, the 3.27's allowed me to stay within the "meat" of my power band a little longer, taking full advantage of the torque curve. My car is heavier than the new Mustang, but it’s also making about 75lbs/ft more torque...and in lower ranges.

It’s really up to you, but if it were me, I’d resist the urge. Especially if this is going to be a daily driver.
 
D

drewzx3

Active Member
Feb 7, 2004
411
1
28
Louisiana
May 23, 2010
#7
  • May 23, 2010
  • #7
csledd said:
Agreed, 3.73's sound like a great idea.

Really I can't think of any other must have mods.. but the Brembo brake package is sexah. personally I like having the side scoops, hood scoop, and the windows louvers.
Click to expand...

thats exactly what i want with mine
 

FastRedPonyCar

Founding Member
Apr 7, 2002
1,678
4
39
I pee sitting down...or do I?
May 24, 2010
#8
  • May 24, 2010
  • #8
If you're not going to be tracking your car, brembos IMO are useless.

I'd say the 3.73's and HID's (unless you want to install your own HID's for about $50) would be a good idea and would take that $1500 the brembo's would cost and put it into suspension or new wheels/tires. I think dropping it a bit and putting wider tires and the shelby spoiler would be a good DD.

Might I suggest

20x9/20x10 5x114.3 ET45 Carroll Shelby CS40 Wheels Silver Staggered
 
9

95PGTTech

Member
Jan 28, 2008
302
20
19
May 24, 2010
#9
  • May 24, 2010
  • #9
I'd buy as big a brake package as is possible for a Mustang. It's ALWAYS the shortcoming of these cars.
 

FastRedPonyCar

Founding Member
Apr 7, 2002
1,678
4
39
I pee sitting down...or do I?
May 24, 2010
#10
  • May 24, 2010
  • #10
95PGTTech said:
I'd buy as big a brake package as is possible for a Mustang. It's ALWAYS the shortcoming of these cars.
Click to expand...

If you're taking it to the track a lot. It's not an issue for daily driving. You can always upgrade pads and stainless steel lines for better feel and stopping.

and you can always upgrade to big brakes later down the road if the stock brakes do end up needing to be swapped. I just don't see them as a necessity for cruising around town other than a little extra bling.
 
H

Husker

New Member
Mar 30, 2010
9
0
0
May 24, 2010
#11
  • May 24, 2010
  • #11
FastRedPonyCar said:
Might I suggest

20x9/20x10 5x114.3 ET45 Carroll Shelby CS40 Wheels Silver Staggered
Click to expand...

I put this link in my Mustang folder,,,Thank-U.

Husker
 

ufnavy06

Member
May 23, 2006
292
0
16
Jacksonville, Florida
May 25, 2010
#12
  • May 25, 2010
  • #12
I wasn't a fan of the rims that come with the Brembos but after seeing them with the GB, huge fan. Amazing looking color contrast, plus the car comes with 255s instead of the 245s. Not a huge difference, but noticable. I don't remember the tires the different rims come with off hand, but I want to say they're more aggressive.

I was slightly disappointed the Brembos aren't at least slotted, especially since this is an option many who would track the car would check. The brakes felt good in the one I test drove today. If I order the 5.0, I'm getting the Brembos.

Couldn't tell much with the 3.73s. Wasn't allowed to truly open the car up on the test drive. So .
 
G

Gregor111

Member
Sep 23, 2008
95
0
6
Spokane, WA
May 26, 2010
#13
  • May 26, 2010
  • #13
I ordered ten days ago and went with 3.55's. The old 4.6 with 320 foot pounds of torque needed a 3.73 a lot more than the new car will. 6th gear on the new tranny is about the same as 5th on the old gear box so with closer gears and 70 more foot pounds of torque, I think the 3.73's are overkill.

I also say go for the Brembo brake package. You don't just get larger brakes but larger wheels and stickier tires. To do any of those on your own will cost nearly as much as the whole package does from the dealer. That is the advantage in that you only pay for upgrading the parts, not buying them all outright.

Greg
 
9

95PGTTech

Member
Jan 28, 2008
302
20
19
May 26, 2010
#14
  • May 26, 2010
  • #14
FastRedPonyCar said:
If you're taking it to the track a lot. It's not an issue for daily driving. You can always upgrade pads and stainless steel lines for better feel and stopping.

and you can always upgrade to big brakes later down the road if the stock brakes do end up needing to be swapped. I just don't see them as a necessity for cruising around town other than a little extra bling.
Click to expand...

Stop hard a few times even in a street mustang and you'll have some nice front rotor runout specs. There is no one with a Mustang who has never not done a little "spirited" driving.
 
A

a351Must2

Windsor II
Founding Member
Mar 12, 1999
4,317
0
0
Snohomish, WA
Jun 1, 2010
#15
  • Jun 1, 2010
  • #15
This one has been a touch one for me too... gear ratio is one of the last things I haven't been able to decide on.

I've had (still having) a bad experience with 3.70 gears in a 351W powered Mustang with a Tremec 3550 5spd. when it had 3.25 gears, 1st gear was useable, and I could use 3rd gear to pass on the highway. Now with 3.70 gears, 1st gear is mostly useless, 2nd gear is necessary to pull out in traffic, and 3rd gear at highway speeds puts your face in the windshield.

I'm kinda assuming the new 5.0 is going to be similar, except for it being able to rev to 7K rpm instead of the 6K my 351W runs to. Going to have to compromise with a 3.55 gear myself, but not ordering for at least another month so I have some more time to hear people's experience.

and...my 2011 will be a daily driver w/ about 15miles of back roads and 15miles of carpool lane each way. It'd also be my road trip car, and probably weekend toy as well.
 

FastRedPonyCar

Founding Member
Apr 7, 2002
1,678
4
39
I pee sitting down...or do I?
Jun 1, 2010
#16
  • Jun 1, 2010
  • #16
When I had my 97 GT (auto) the 3.73's made virtually no difference in acceleration.. just drank more gas. When I put the 4.10's in, HUGE difference in acceleration and still to this day, unexplainable better gas milage on the interstate vs both the 3.73's and stock gearing.

I think in the 5.0, the 3.73's should be the go to gearing ratio.
 

verytalonted

Member
May 6, 2010
36
0
7
San Angelo, TX
Jun 2, 2010
#17
  • Jun 2, 2010
  • #17
3.73!!!

Everything else is a waste.
 
H

Husker

New Member
Mar 30, 2010
9
0
0
Jun 2, 2010
#18
  • Jun 2, 2010
  • #18
verytalonted said:
3.73!!!

Everything else is a waste.
Click to expand...

OK--> Why?

Husker
 
C

callahan318

New Member
Jun 6, 2010
6
0
0
Jun 8, 2010
#19
  • Jun 8, 2010
  • #19
I too am interested in this. I am wondering which one is really best, but am leaning towards to the 3.73s
 
H

Husker

New Member
Mar 30, 2010
9
0
0
Jun 8, 2010
#20
  • Jun 8, 2010
  • #20
callahan318 said:
I too am interested in this. I am wondering which one is really best, but am leaning towards to the 3.73s
Click to expand...

I still haven't placed an order because of the gear selection, I'm gonna live with this car and the last thing I need, is regrets over ordering the wrong option to satisfy my needs.

Soon as I'm able to test drive a 3.73 in city traffic, only then will I place an order.

I drove two (M & A) with 3.31 gears and was happy but I need to experience first hand how it (3.73) will perform in city driving, I don't want to be shifting multiple times between stop lights (One block) also I've read where some start out in 2nd gear,,I don't want that.

Bottom line, armed with advice from here and other places, combined with a hands on test will decide my final decision.

Husker
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

H
Ongoing Battle With Hydraulic Lifters
  • hailer06
  • Jun 8, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
295
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 9, 2026
Noobz347
Z
Progress Thread zeth194 - New Guy on the Block
  • zeth194
  • Mar 19, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
571
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 26, 2026
LILCBRA
B
Where to go from here on my build…
  • B0udreaux
  • Jul 14, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
198
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 18, 2026
AeroCoupe
A
95 Gt intermittent backfire
  • A_A_Ron
  • May 26, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
429
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 26, 2025
A_A_Ron
A
What's your tow rig?
  • LILCBRA
  • May 31, 2026
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
3
Views
136
Other Auto Tech May 31, 2026
LILCBRA
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2010 - 2014 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?