• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

help a newbie choose between 4.6, 5.0, & 351W?

  • Thread starter Thread starter TaoOfStang
  • Start date Start date Sep 22, 2004
T

TaoOfStang

New Member
Jun 14, 2004
14
0
1
Sep 22, 2004
#1
  • Sep 22, 2004
  • #1
It's my first post, so be gentle. I'm looking for a little help from those more knowledgable than myself--basically everyone. I've got a '68 coupe w/289/c4, and I'm looking to upgrade the engine/tranny, and go maybe go EFI. I've already got the Heidt's MII suspension, and it should be finished within the next few weekends (work & golf allowing ). Given that I've already lost the shock towers, which seems to be the main objection when it comes to 4.6 transplants, which way would you go? 4.6, 5.0, or 351W?

Gonna be a daily driver, but I'd like it to have...um...I think the technical term is balls. I do a lot of highway driving, and I'm probably not going to be taking any checkered flags anytime soon (well, maybe the odd unofficial one at a stoplight ), so I think I'm going to go AOD. I'd prefer to be able to buy a donor car (maybe a police package Crown Vic?) and pull the whole enchilada (engine/tranny/accessories?).

Mmmm...enchiladas...

If I've inadvertantly broken a forum rule, or shoved my newbie foot in some newbie orifice, please accept my heartfelt apologies.

TaoOfStang

Hey! You broke ya cherry! -Paulie, Goodfellas
 
F

Fostang

Founding Member
May 8, 2002
1,400
0
36
Stockton, Ca
Sep 22, 2004
#2
  • Sep 22, 2004
  • #2
I like 99-up motors SOHC ones for daily driving I'm sure you can ****** one up easily.

That being said you I'd probably do the a 351 windsor efi.
 

MrBobMarley

Founding Member
Oct 7, 2002
460
0
16
Ft Myers, FL
Sep 23, 2004
#3
  • Sep 23, 2004
  • #3
Efi 351 would be sweet. I'd go 4.6 dohc myself, but you're gonna cry when you see what parts cost.

Fostang, do you have any pics of the 67 fb?
 

one2gamble

Founding Member
Feb 27, 2001
902
1
0
Monterey
Sep 23, 2004
#4
  • Sep 23, 2004
  • #4
i would have to ask how much money you want to spend before I can give you an answer
 
N

no_3

Founding Member
Oct 21, 2002
73
0
0
Sep 23, 2004
#5
  • Sep 23, 2004
  • #5
I just did a 351w with an Edelbrock performer rpm package, everything is sweet, sort of cheap and ballsy.
 
T

TaoOfStang

New Member
Jun 14, 2004
14
0
1
Sep 23, 2004
#6
  • Sep 23, 2004
  • #6
One2gamble, as far as how much I want to spend, sky's the limit--as long as the sky ends somewhere shy of $7500 for engine/tranny/etc...hehe

I've been searchng through the posts, and the more I do, the more respect I have for the opinions of the posters in this forum. That being said, most of you seem to be choosing the 351 over the rest. Is that 'cause more cubes=good? I've driven mustang 351's, and I can't disagree. Who's driven a 4.6 or 5.0 in a classic, and how did you like it (behind the wheel, as opposed to under the hood ? 5.0 and 351 are relatively drop-in, especially w/ no shock towers, but I know there have to be more than a few mechanical bumps in the road with the 4.6. What are the really big hiccups?

The biggest reason that the 4.6 & 5.0 are on my list is because I think I can get solid donor vehicles for either, and hopefully get some decent performance while making the whole process cheaper/faster/less painful. So what would make a good donor car for the whole she-bang if I went 351w/EFI/AOD? I seem to be fresh out of '95 Cobra R's...

TaoofStang

'68 Coupe
Presently: bone stock 289
Future: ?
 

MrBobMarley

Founding Member
Oct 7, 2002
460
0
16
Ft Myers, FL
Sep 23, 2004
#7
  • Sep 23, 2004
  • #7
About the 351 efi swap, try asking in the 5.0 tech forum. A lot of the guys there swap out their 5.0s for 351s and I'm pretty sure they keep it fuel injected without re-wiring the whole car. I'm not up to snuff on the whole swap, but it's pretty common. So pretty much, if you can go 5.0 efi, you should be able to f.i. the 351 with most of the existing harness for the 5.0.
 

Max Power

Active Member
Jul 31, 2003
1,774
1
36
St Paul
Sep 23, 2004
#8
  • Sep 23, 2004
  • #8
There are some issues with 351 EFI stuff if I am not mistaken. Hood clearance is one, getting an intake that flows well enough is another.

EFI is of huge benefit if you drive in all seasons, but the electronic controls required to make it work in a classic are daunting. You need computers, wiring, sensors everywhere to feed in to the computers, and you have to convert your fuel system for high pressure electric fuel pumps and returns.

Having seen a dyno test on a 347efi vs. carbureted, there was virtually no power difference. The driveability is a bit better, but is your are driving mostly as a summer weekend cruiser, I don't think EFI comes close to providing benefits in a cost vs. performance analysis.

I would go 351 stroked out to 393 or 408. Mountains of torque at a reasonable cost.
 

Route666

Active Member
Aug 16, 2003
1,652
6
39
Brisbane, Australia
Sep 23, 2004
#9
  • Sep 23, 2004
  • #9
For daily driver, reliabilty is the main goal, balls second and fuel economy last, but still important to an extent, in my eyes. I'd suggest a 351W, without a stroker. Perhaps have it bored 0.030" over, to the lovely 357 number. 9.5 or 10 to 1 CR and a good balanced assembly and fit rotating assembly and you're good for reliability. A carb would probably be the best bet if Max's stated EFI dramas exist. Even a 393 or 408 stroker might be as reliable, I don't know. The money you save on this over EFI or a 4.6 you can split up to make up 20 cents per gallon of fuel for a long while.

Anyways, thems my humble opinions.
 

65fastback2+2

New Member
Aug 4, 2003
1,229
0
0
Louisville, KY
Sep 23, 2004
#10
  • Sep 23, 2004
  • #10
no_3 said:
I just did a 351w with an Edelbrock performer rpm package, everything is sweet, sort of cheap and ballsy.
Click to expand...

I just did a roller 5.0 with the Edelbrock performer intake/600cfm Edelbrock carb/95 GT roller cam. It would be a screamin ballser except my 3.00 rear gears. Other than the carb setup, its stock, and I get 18 mpg doin 80 on the highway so for a carb motor with some umph, it friggin rocks. If you did and AOD with some heads, headers and 3.73 posi, it would be a total street killer.
 

mustang70

Founding Member
Nov 15, 2001
2,445
2
48
San Diego
Sep 23, 2004
#11
  • Sep 23, 2004
  • #11
Trickflow makes a lower manifold that will fit on the 351 and can use a 302 upper. Most aftermarket intakes can handle the 351. Especially if it's going to be mild. The fuel rails will have to be widened to work with the 351 as well.

Have you thought about aftermarket fuel injection? This is what I've been looking at myself:

http://www.edelbrock.com/automotive/mpfi_sbford.html
 
F

Fostang

Founding Member
May 8, 2002
1,400
0
36
Stockton, Ca
Sep 23, 2004
#12
  • Sep 23, 2004
  • #12
MrBobMarley said:
Fostang, do you have any pics of the 67 fb?
Click to expand...



Pics yeah I got pics of this bucket.

I'm just ticked at it and haven't touched it in months. Plus I've been busy on other projects.

The motor has been in and out 3 times already.

I haven't driven the car in 2 years.
 

one2gamble

Founding Member
Feb 27, 2001
902
1
0
Monterey
Sep 23, 2004
#13
  • Sep 23, 2004
  • #13
I dont think 7500 is going to do the 4.6 swap and give you the kind of power your looking for. I vote 351.
 

one2gamble

Founding Member
Feb 27, 2001
902
1
0
Monterey
Sep 23, 2004
#14
  • Sep 23, 2004
  • #14
still not dropping that kind of money on heads I know nothing about
 
T

TaoOfStang

New Member
Jun 14, 2004
14
0
1
Sep 23, 2004
#15
  • Sep 23, 2004
  • #15
Pretty helpful, guys. I appreciate you taking the time.

I just got off the phone with Dave Stribling at DVS Restorations. They're the ones who did (are doing?) the MIB 4.6 restomod project in Mustangs & Ford Mag. In a very friendly way, he informed me that I was an idiot for even considering a 4.6 when all I want is a daily driver that can kick some (minor) ass. This is NOT the first time I've been called an idiot. It's not even the first time today. It's also, unfortunately, not the first time I've been forced to agree--very bad for the self-esteem .

So with the 4.6 on the scrap-heap of my mind, I turn my attention elsewhere. With cool factor out the window, the next batter up is POWER. That 351w is starting to look really good to me. It's a solid, proven engine that can be easily modded into a fairly serious street machine. The downside is I can't for the life of me find out what, if any, donor car could make this easier/cheaper by providing me with engine, tranny, accessories, and maybe EFI. Any suggestions?

So let's leave the "whole enchilada" idea sitting in the microwave for a moment. I figure I can get a decent aftermarket AOD (reverse manual shifting?) for about $1k, and I can nix the EFI (for now). Is there a ford model that I could pull a decent 351w to rebuild + accessories. Or should I just suck it up and buy a crate engine off the shelf, then try to piece together the accessories?

TaoOfStang
 

66P51GT

New Member
Nov 7, 2003
721
1
0
Cerritos, CA
Sep 23, 2004
#16
  • Sep 23, 2004
  • #16
You can do it cheaper if you start with block and go for a simple rebuild. But once you add performance goodies, it is sometimes best to start with a crate... especially if you have never pulled or rebuilt an engine before. Now, I'm not discouraging you from doing it yourself, but be prepared for doing a lot of research and homework to do it right.

Here are some sources for crate motors:
http://www.fordracingparts.com/crateengine/main.asp
http://www.f-p-s.com/engines/long_blocks.html
http://www.coasthigh.com/assembly_index.html

Happy Shopping
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

J
88 Foxbody 5.0 Driveshaft Issue! Need Help
  • James Hood
  • May 1, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
471
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 1, 2025
AeroCoupe
G
1983 GLX Convertible 5.0 5-Speed 4BBL 'Barn Find' - 82,000 original miles - Restoration Motivation Needed
  • Grande Luxe X-Factor
  • Oct 7, 2023
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 31, 2024
Mac131
A
5.0 Vs 4.6
  • Aarons915
  • Jul 2, 2015
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
9
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 19, 2015
FastDriver
P
First mod will be GT40, help a newbie out
  • putertopia
  • Oct 2, 2009
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
8
Views
5K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Oct 2, 2009
LethalInjection
A
5.0 Cobra or 4.6 Cobra?
  • Aggie 08
  • Apr 11, 2008
  • SVT Tech Forum
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
20K
SVT Tech Forum Jul 25, 2008
FastDriver
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?