• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Help me pick a cam!

  • Thread starter Thread starter smercier
  • Start date Start date Dec 13, 2005
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
S

smercier

New Member
Apr 17, 2002
28
0
1
Baton Rouge, La
Jan 30, 2006
#21
  • Jan 30, 2006
  • #21
Sorry for the long hiatus, just been wrapped up in other things.

The heads are GT-40 irons from a '95 lightning. They've been lightly ported on the intake side, and the exhaust bumps have been removed. I have not had them flow tested, and don't want to invest more money in them having it done.

Right now I'm leaning toward taking a bit of a shot in the dark with an e-cam. Before I do, I'll probably spend a little while on the phone with a few companies seeing what kind of shelf cams they have. I imagine getting a custom cam made without precise head flow numbers isn't the best idea.
 

69Rcode_Mach1

Active Member
Apr 20, 2004
1,473
1
37
Salt Lake City, Utah
Jan 30, 2006
#22
  • Jan 30, 2006
  • #22
I haven't read this whole thread, but let me say. The stock 5.0 HO cam is what you need. It produces tons of torque and really pulls hard through the whole powerband. I think it is underrated, it is a very good cam that offers great results.
 
S

smercier

New Member
Apr 17, 2002
28
0
1
Baton Rouge, La
Jan 31, 2006
#23
  • Jan 31, 2006
  • #23
Yeah, after talking to one of my dad's old racing buddies last night I'm thinking of a stock HO or B cam as well. My main concern with the HO cam is buying a used one. I don't imagine I can find one new outside of the Ford dealership, and I imagine they'd want an arm and a leg for it.
 

stang302v8

New Member
Aug 16, 2005
94
0
0
carlisle, pa
Jan 31, 2006
#24
  • Jan 31, 2006
  • #24
F303 cam. with 1.6 rockers the lift is .512 and it has LSA of 110. lopes mean and has great power especially midrange-top end. peak power is like 2800-6000 rpm. thats what i went with
 

milner351

Founding Member
Jun 12, 2002
92
0
0
The Motor City
Jan 31, 2006
#25
  • Jan 31, 2006
  • #25
It is specifically for cases like this that I invested in the desktop dyno computer program.
Like any other program, the output is dependant on the input... however, if you have accurate information on your components you can get within a few % of the real world dyno numbers using the computer.... that aside, what is really important is the fact that you can SEE the trends and shape changes of the power / torque curve by making changes. You can also use the "iterator" and allow the computer to sweep a large range of cam profiles and allow you to choose the best one for what you are looking for.
It sure has helped me make enging build decisions.

I ended up having CAM RESEARCH grind a custom cam for my 395 stroked windsor with twisted wedge heads. I wanted to keep lift at a minimum to preserve the health of my valve train (twisted wedge heads tend to put a pretty good burden on valve guides)
Cam research is an EXCELLENT place to deal with, VERY helpful on the phone, and if you're going with a flat tappent, they offer the only service I know of to break in the cam for you so you don't have to deal with that on your initial fire up of your fresh engine.

GOOD LUCK!
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Jan 31, 2006
#26
  • Jan 31, 2006
  • #26
Z06killinSBF said:
H.O. cam has .440 lift. The thing to do with the H.O. cam is to run the 1.73 roller rockers. That gives it close to about .460 something lift.
Click to expand...
You're off a little with those specs. The Lobe lift of the GT/HO cam is .278, giving you .445 lift with 1.6 rockers, .473 with 1.7's and .481 with 1.73's.
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Jan 31, 2006
#27
  • Jan 31, 2006
  • #27
smercier said:
Yeah, after talking to one of my dad's old racing buddies last night I'm thinking of a stock HO or B cam as well. My main concern with the HO cam is buying a used one. I don't imagine I can find one new outside of the Ford dealership, and I imagine they'd want an arm and a leg for it.
Click to expand...
If you need a good used GT/HO roller, I've got one pulled from an 88 Lincoln Mark VII. Engine had less than 70K miles on it. Cam looks great, no visable wear, takes a long time for one to wear to the point where it changes the specs anyhow. I'm over here in Opelousas.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

A
Discussion on mild budget build/ top end
  • Acesario
  • Feb 21, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
673
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 23, 2026
General karthief
3
Eight inches is enough for me...
  • 351MooseStang
  • Nov 27, 2025
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
5
Views
534
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Mar 2, 2026
Bullitt347
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
S
Progress Thread 1989 LX 5.0 convertible - mild project
  • Scott_S
  • Aug 18, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 4 5 6
Replies
107
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 26, 2026
AeroCoupe
Engine An engine building combo with stock Speed Density (SD) system
  • Mcmahst
  • Jan 14, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
11
Views
911
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 15, 2025
Mcmahst
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?